It's not a cheapshot, given your stated beliefs, you've got some serious cognitive disonance going there
@kavi
I do not think anyone has ever died from lack of sex - e.g. needing it. But sex is part of our survival strategy to propel our genes into the future, it's an imperative for life, and sex and procreation are inextricably linked to each other as it was 100k years ago and still is today.
A happy and healthy sex life is conducive to a happier human. If I am living in a bubble its of my own creation and i'm happy as hell with it.
I do believe that if more men had a vibrant and active sex life they would be happier and the world would be a better place.
So given this forum's stated purpose is about getting access to vagina - what is your purpose here?
Furthermore there are many problems with your response as it contains multiple assertions about the value of sex, societal norms, and individual worth. These assertions are presented as personal opinions but are also framed as overarching truths that others may not "understand" due to a supposed lack of "Game" or knowledge.
1. **Sexual Worth**: The assertion that one's personal view of the worthiness of a sexual partner is based on a set of qualifications defined by oneself alone can be interpreted as a subjective perspective.
2. **Generalization of Modern Women (and Men)**: Labeling modern women—and by extension, men—as "pathetic failures" is a sweeping generalization that doesn't account for the diversity of experiences, beliefs, and values among individuals.
3. **Game & Knowledge**: Defining worth or understanding through the lens of "Game" or "Knowledge" as the text suggests, implies a hierarchical system that others must ascend to gain approval or understanding. This viewpoint places the individual expressing it as an arbiter of worth, based on their criteria.
4. **Bubble & Functioning Society**: The implication that differing viewpoints stem from living in a more "positive and stable" environment can be seen as a method to delegitimize differing perspectives by attributing them to ignorance or a lack of exposure to "reality."
5. **Sexual Need**: The statement about men not "needing" sex conflates physiological drive with essential biological need. While it's accurate to say that sex is not a basic requirement for individual survival like food or oxygen, it disregards the complexity of human sexuality and the variety of reasons people engage in sexual activities, which can include but are not limited to, emotional connection, pleasure, and procreation.
6. **Modern Stressors**: The claim that modern city living, with its associated stressors, is responsible for increased "neediness" in men, could be considered a simplification. Levels of sexual desire and perceived "need" for sex are influenced by a multitude of factors, including but not limited to, biological, psychological, and sociocultural variables.
It's important to recognize that the statement contains a set of perspectives that may not be universally shared, and some may find them problematic due to the sweeping generalizations and subjective value judgments they involve.
I think you need to get laid bro.
Clear cheapshot u put in there as an Edit but the bolded is clearly not true otherwise your wording wouldnt be such. The claimed empathy is not consistent with the tone of that paragraph.
All it comes down to is this, sex happens with a human being. If that human is trash, or you are not impressed by them, or they have shown too much negativity then it will affect the value of sex.
As I consider modern women to be such pathetic failures I dont consider sex to be valueble. It will likely be a degen pathetic loser who I will be ****ing and I simply consider it beneath me to enjoy or engage in such actions.
For me to consider a woman sexually worthy she must elevate herself to that level, but given mainstream women (and men) are such pathetic losers with weak Game it is just a disrespect of my Game to lower myself to valuing sex with normal women.
This can only be understoof by those having elevated their Game aka Knowledge.
You may be living in a bubble where things are alot more positive and stable around you, a more functioning society where you dont see the level of failure I see.
Also, it is factually wrong to suggest that men need sex. It is important not to confuse circumstantial neediness with a default position. Men are more horny because they are more stressed. Living in a modern city with noise, pollution, other people media, other stresses etc is alot different to living as we did throughout history, where things were much calmer, there was nature, quiteness, cleanliness etc and those things make a big difference to male neediness. It is simply impossible for men to need sex, or women for that matter, since it is not food or oxygen.
