Young guy debunks the age pill cope for men

[CornbreadFed]

Warning, long video

 

[Plinco]

He has a decent perspective but he makes assumptions about what an individual wants based on what people at whatever age wants on average. I'm almost 40 and I'd love to party in a room full of energy, I'm an outlier.

I think one shouldn't compare oneself to other people. Everyone has different goals, some more different than others, and comparing yourself to others puts one at risk of feeling envy, or substituting one's judgement for the judgment of another. My advice is to know what it is that you want, do it, and work to perform well at it. Men are judged based on their performance.

 

[The Duke]

This guy projects a lot based on his own personal belief's. He also throws away years of evolution. His own outlook is really limiting. Dude sounds flat boring to hang out with.

He thinks that 30year olds dating 20 year olds is a bad deal and everybody settles down by age 30(like he has). LMFAO.

This dude has a very narrow mindset. Hasn't lived much life. He lacks testosterone for sure. Might be a little gay. Something not quite there with his sex drive.

I was changing out girls every 2-3months in my 30's. Partied 3 nights a week. Had several friends right there with me.

 

[AureliusMaximus]

Warning, long video

Just install the plugin "Enhancer for YouTube" in your fav Chromium browser (I use Brave which is awesome imo), and speed the video up to 16 times. Works flawlessly.

I saw/heard his whole video in less than 4-5 minutes on 4.5 X speed ha ha.

I'm almost 40 and I'd love to party in a room full of energy, I'm an outlier.

Same.
Never say no to a fun night out with the bois n' girls.

Also some ppl look like shyte and really old in their 30-40ties. While others look damn good and doesn't age psychically fast.

So in other words:
Life isn't fair and equal to for everyone.
He is kind of making the assumption that everybody follows the same straight line in life. Nothing could be further from the truth.

 

[CAPSLOCK BANDIT]

Every man is exactly where he should be, doing exactly what he should be doing, because that is what he has chosen for himself.

 

[SW15]

A man in his 20s has the advantage of having easier access to women in their 20s. Closeness in age makes dating a lot easier and there's also better longer term potential when two people meet younger. A 25 year old man who starts a relationship with a 23 year old woman has the potential for a long term, meaningful relationship, possibly marriage. It's not the same when a never married 35 year old man starts something with a never married 33 year old woman.

It's much more difficult for a 35 year old man to date a 25 year old woman than a 32-33 year old woman. This is why the typical 30s/40s man is a pussie beggar for similarly aged women. The typical 30s/40s man doesn't offer enough to attract a woman 10+ years younger. He ends up needing to settle for some woman close to his own age. A lot of 30s/40s men will end up settling for 30s/40s single moms, which is a lot worse when the 30s/40s man is a childless man. A similarly aged, childless woman is a realistic option for a 30s/40s childless man.

 

[Cowboy-Cheems]

Such scenarios are very situational. There was a time when men were encouraged to get careers established, and then marry the youngest and healthiest females available, likewise young women were encouraged to marry these men for security reasons. On both sides of my family, My great grandfather was married to a woman half his age. In the current age, this is pretty rare in western culture, however the concept of being in a relationship for security still remains. An attractive and fit 40 year-old man with a 6 figure salary or larger should be able to get with women in their early '20s, on the condition that he has more to offer than his younger competition or there simply is not much younger competition available. Don't confuse this with being a sugar-daddy though, that is just a form of whoring.

 

[Jesse Pinkman]

LOL OP don't lie, that's you homie

 

[The Duke]

LOL OP don't lie, that's you homie

I thought the same thing.

 

[SW15]

An attractive and fit 40 year-old man with a 6 figure salary or larger should be able to get with women in their early '20s, on the condition that he has more to offer than his younger competition or there simply is not much younger competition available.

Low six figures isn't enough these days. There was a recent thread about this. Most of the responses were in April-May 2023, before you joined.

Women Don't Want a Semi-Successful Man

Men in this category, $75k-$125k salary, relatively in shape, drive a good car, has a few hobbies, women do not want. Why? Because this man has standards. Women do not want to work for their men. Women of today want a simp or a millionaire. Simple as that. This is what society aka social media...

www.sosuave.net

In most US cities, a minimum of $150,000 per year is what it takes to see some sort of boost in attractiveness in one's 30s and beyond.

You're correct that 30s/40s men need to offer more than younger competition to get a girlfriend 10+ years younger.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Every man is exactly where he should be, doing exactly what he should be doing, because that is what he has chosen for himself.

More often it's what he has settled for.

 

[Cowboy-Cheems]

Low six figures isn't enough these days. There was a recent thread about this. Most of the responses were in April-May 2023, before you joined.

Women Don't Want a Semi-Successful Man

Men in this category, $75k-$125k salary, relatively in shape, drive a good car, has a few hobbies, women do not want. Why? Because this man has standards. Women do not want to work for their men. Women of today want a simp or a millionaire. Simple as that. This is what society aka social media...

www.sosuave.net

In most US cities, a minimum of $150,000 per year is what it takes to see some sort of boost in attractiveness in one's 30s and beyond.

You're correct that 30s/40s men need to offer more than younger competition to get a girlfriend 10+ years younger.

Indeed. 100k is not really a lot of money these days, unless you have a very frugal and modest lifestyle. I see a lot of guys that think they have to buy their wife a new Cadillac or Mercedes every three years. Their daughters and other women see this and expect the same. Women have been conditioned to believe that their presence must be bought. Many women talk about wanting to be equals with men but will be quick to accuse a man of being "broke" or "cheap" because he does not spend a fortune on her for merely existing.

 

[zekko]

More often it's what he has settled for.

A wise man once told me that everything in life is a compromise. I can't disagree with him.

 

[RazorRambo24]

I will say this: I agree with him on this point -- Your childhood/youth/early adulthood is everything and people should def do whatever they can to take advantage of that. When you get older, the ability to get the best type of pu55y, young pu55y is limited for a majority of men.

 

[SW15]

100k is not really a lot of money these days, unless you have a very frugal and modest lifestyle.

A guy making in the low $100,000s won't see much of a boost in his dating fortunes at that salary range.

I agree with him on this point -- Your childhood/youth/early adulthood is everything and people should def do whatever they can to take advantage of that. When you get older, the ability to get the best type of pu55y, young pu55y is limited for a majority of men.

True. Most men can't pull substantially younger pussie.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Indeed. 100k is not really a lot of money these days, unless you have a very frugal and modest lifestyle. I see a lot of guys that think they have to buy their wife a new Cadillac or Mercedes every three years. Their daughters and other women see this and expect the same. Women have been conditioned to believe that their presence must be bought. Many women talk about wanting to be equals with men but will be quick to accuse a man of being "broke" or "cheap" because he does not spend a fortune on her for merely existing.

Depends on where you live. In a big city surely not, in a smaller city or town it's upper middle class.

The problem usually is the person spends a lot of money frivolously on dumb stuff like expensive phone plans, coffees every day, eating out regularly, etc...

Most people could easily clean up their spending and have an extra $500 each month without trying too hard. The more you make, the more that number increases.

Anyone eating out more than once a week is not only killing their bank account, they are killing their waistlines.

 

[Gamisch]

Warning, long video

Its funny how younger dudes view 40 untill they hit 40 . I think a 35 year old man stills leans more towards feeling " early 30 "than feeling "almost 40".

And then..you party and live it up and waste your actual prime due to bs advice like this. A man's prime is from 20-40, then he had yet a after prime from 40 to 55. And finally a "grand finale prime" from 55 to 70.

Thats right. I see TONS of 70 year old man in my job (construction) being fit and actually active. Way more active than the new crop of low testosterone bytch beta men who play COD and watch porn all day evey day long. I see 70 year olds that cant leave the job because the company will collapse without their knowledge and expertise .

Once i realized this i understood that 40 is NOTHING. Completely different from when I hit 30 and I thought my life was over. I partied and boozed my time away while I never realized that I would be in the best shap of my life at end 30..

there's a catch tho..your lifestyle will definitely accelerate at some age. You love healthy? You'll look good at 50. You smoke drink do drugs? You'll look like a living corpse at 50. So ..again..choose wisely.

bottomline: this dude in the video will have a COMPLETELY different view when HE hits 40/50 and even 60. Better listen to those older guys who got some actual experience and credentials.

 

[CornbreadFed]

It is easier for a late bloomer to say that 30s and 40s are better than 20s and vice versa. As a late bloomer myself, I prefer that over being an early bloomer because most guys I know that peaked as early bloomers are not in the best positions today. The ultimate answer is going to purely depend on what you are looking for the most out of women. If you value sex and younger women, then your prime time to do that is under the age of 30. I don't care how well you are doing right now as a 40/50- year old man, you will never be able to replicate the sex of a horny teenager or college student. You will never have the MAA apartment pool party sex factories that you had post college graduation in that new city.

Now for late bloomers, you will deal with the least number of games and BS from women. Younger women are just not mature and more cutthroat towards men. Yes, older women can screw you over by divorce rape, but it has to be more planned out and it is riskier. Nonetheless, there's a reason you have a lot more incels under 30 than over 30 and that is because women are brutal towards every men when they are under 30. Like I mentioned before, most guys that peaked early in dating hit a huge wall because dealing with a lot of women especially younger women is like jumping in a river full of hungry crocodiles. Late bloomers have been bitten and burned by women previously, so hopefully by the time they glow up they know the precautions and gameplan.

 

[Bingo-Player]

Not watching the whole video because I don't have time but I get the jist of it

AS someone who partied and fvcked a lot of girls 20-25 I wasn't ready for a relationship because I was an idiot I was dating a lot of girls but in all honesty most of them were very low quality trash

at 25 I was fed up of going out really fed up of it , and I was also fed up of good time gals

I eventually met someone who was pretty genuine and at the time was a calming influence on my life she also didn't really know how to be in a healthy relationship

we kind of just made it up as we went along for 4 years and eventually after learning a lot from one another we decided it was time to go our separate ways

I firmly believe a lot of young couples who get together in their 20's hit that inflection point whereby the relationship maybe seemed like a good idea at the start but as you mature and change as people sometimes you just aint going to be suitable

So this idea that oh well you know " all the good women are taken in their 20's" yes some probably are but a hell of a lot more will be constantly coming BACK onto the market

Now I am 30 , I have a better understanding of what I need in a woman, I can screen better I can read the signals better, I can fvck better

I don't seem to be having much trouble attracting women between 23 & 27 ,volume is a bit of an issue but thats why you need to get really good at cold approach and conversation

 

[SW15]

The ultimate answer is going to purely depend on what you are looking for the most out of women. If you value sex and younger women, then your prime time to do that is under the age of 30. I don't care how well you are doing right now as a 40/50- year old man, you will never be able to replicate the sex of a horny teenager or college student. You will never have the MAA apartment pool party sex factories that you had post college graduation in that new city.

MAA Apartments are well known in Sun Belt cities. Some MAA complexes can have fun parties but these parties are not open to the general public and there's a fairly stringent wristband system with security monitoring.

MAA - Apartment Communities in the Southeast & Southwest

Find your new apartment to rent in the luxurious, pet-friendly apartment communities of the Southeast and Southwest managed by Mid-America Apartments.

www.maac.com

You're correct that the typical 40-55 year old man isn't going to be able to hang out at a complex pool party in an MAA complex. He might not be there, even if he lives in an MAA complex with a good party scene. Not all MAA complexes are big time party complexes.