Sartain is most known for his "female friendship" angle, which I don't think makes a lot of sense for a lot of men. I don't have any platonic female friends. I have made it to middle age without female friends. I think it has been good that I've stayed out of the friend zone with a lot of women. At the same time, my lack of female friends has forced me into being a cold approacher because I don't receive social circle introductions.
Since moving to my current city, none of my male friends' girlfriends/wives have ever introduced me to a woman that has resulted in a first date. I'm not on bad terms with any of them but it's always been interesting to me that none of them have ever lifted a finger to attempt to get me a first date. None of them ever talked me up as a viable boyfriend to anyone they knew.
They're not true friends, even though he seems to pretend they are. He only befriends extremely attractive model types.
I think he did claim they'd do things male friends would do such as rides from the airport, but I kind of doubt that's true for most of them. What he really intends is getting used to being around highly attractive women and not being thirsty which I do think has value.
The social proof element is the biggest benefit though as well as the fact that once women who is confident but DOESN'T have thirst, sex may naturally come at some point since it'll be very low pressure.
I did try having a female "friend" last year, after already fvcking her, but stopped trying to and told her I just wanted to be friends...lo and behold it didn't work out and she got jealous and complained I wasn't intimate enough. It just seems pointless. We did have a nice shroom trip together at least.
Why put up with all their shvt and liabilities?