I can list one. Sex without having to make the effort of approaching, attracting, and seducing new women. It does take a lot of effort to get new pusssy.
I would consider that laziness. To stick with something that depreciates because it’s too ”hard” to get something else, that’s not a benefit. That’s sunken cost fallacy.
I don't consider finding new women to be laziness. There is a saying in business that "it is easier to keep an existing customer than get a new customer". I think that saying applies to attraction-seduction as well.
Check out some of the threads below for the efforts it takes to get laid. I would not consider
@nicksaiz65 or
@Jesse Pinkman to be lazy.
Girls like assh0les, after all. Girls don't like assh*les. They like men with a spine. Men who will say and do what they want regardless of how it may affect their chances with the girl. It just so happens that assh*oles fit the bill.
www.sosuave.net
In this post,
@nicksaiz65 indicated in May 2020 that he had estimated he had approached 200 women lifetime in order to get 7 different sexual partners. 7/200 = 3.5%. Having sex with 3.5% of total approaches is a fairly typical outcome.
A lot of men don't have the time or desire to approach 200 women, which is why you see men swiping through thousands on women on the Big 3 swipe apps in most of the larger USA cities. Let's compare a daygamer to an app swiper. A daygamer might go out to an area with decent foot traffic on a Saturday afternoon for 2 hours. If he's lucky, he gets in 5 approaches. He might arrange 1 date from that, but I've had 2 hour daygame sessions where I didn't arrange any dates. An app swiper could swipe through 500-600 women in that same 2 hour time block on a Saturday afternoon, all without having to leave his home, get dressed, and look presentable. Both take effort and the results aren't all that great for most men outside the Top 10-20% in SMV.
So I thought that since I am going out and approaching so much, why not post a field report thread. Yeah, it is a little over 3 AM and I am posting this but whatever. Hate to post a new thread every time I go out and do approaches so I will just keep bumping this one (until mods make an official...
www.sosuave.net
@Jesse Pinkman demonstrates he does a lot of approaches in his field reports thread too.
And it’s not that hard to get a new woman, especially if the woman is over 30.
That's not true. Women 30+ tend to have higher standards. Despite their lessening looks, they tend to require more from men close to their own age in order to give them sex. They tend to drop those requirements if you're 10+ years younger than them and they don't see relationship potential. A decent looking 22 year old will not encounter that much difficult in having sex with a 35 year old, but a 37 year old might have to deal with more shiit testing.
-By Caleb Jones I’m going to be a contrarian today. For a long time, I’ve discussed the downside of dating women over the age of 33 if your goal is to get to sex as quickly as possible. I’ve expounded on this idea in detail...
alphamale20.com
-By Caleb Jones In the first part of this article, I discussed some of the advantages and huge disadvantages of dating women over the age of 33 in a get-to-sex-fast context. I described how women over the age of 33 take much longer to have...
alphamale20.com
I polled you guys about which topics I should talk more about on this blog. The number one most requested topic, perhaps unsurprisingly, was more seduction and dating techniques. Message received. I have heard you and I’m here to give you want you want. This...
alphamale20.com
I don’t see intimacy and closeness as a benefit, I see experiencing younger hotter sexier women as a benefit. Everyone here seems to want a long term relationship, but men seem to forget woman are on the clock, they expire. Yes, the women is young and sexy at 24, but 15 years later, when she is menopausal and losing her looks, is a man going to love the “intimacy“ and “closeness” with her. I doubt it.
I’m surprised so many men on Sosuave value LTR. Intimacy and closeness may be fun, but I keep thinking when the woman turns 45 and becomes menopausal, how fun is it.
Most men tend to value some sort of pair bonding experience. This gets more pronounced in men after age 35, but even some younger men experience this. In my local area social circle, the men I know started their current LTRs by their late 20s, and mostly by 26.
You're correct that a lot of women lose their looks as they age. I remember seeing one of my friends' then-girlfriend (now wife) when she was 27 at a pool party and seeing how she had dropped off in looks at 27 as compared to when I first met her at 23. I can think of an instance where I had sex for the first time with a mid-30s woman. She wasn't fat but she had a plain-ish body. It was more difficult to get turned on. I also have had sex with some women in their 30s who had very good bodies. Yes, there were some signs of aging but they had strong lifestyles to counter effects of aging and I was easily turned on.
While right now in my late 30s, I find women in their 30s/40s attractive, I wonder how I'll feel when I'm 50-55 about women 50-55. Even when in my 20s, I found some women around 35-45 attractive. I've never found women 50+ attractive. Yes, there are examples like Liz Hurley (57 right now) and Denise Austin (66 right now) who are attractive, but they are some rare that it isn't even worth mentioning. I can see why a 55 year old man would desire a 35-40 year old woman. While a 35-40 year old woman is far less attractive than a 25 year old, a 15-20 year age gap is an impressive pull for a 55 year old man.
