So female lawyers take the LSAT. The LSAT tests you extensively on all the logical fallacies. So in order to do well on the test you have to know illogical arguments cold.
Yet female lawyers use logical fallacies in their personal life. In fact women almost exclusively argue in logical fallacies.
Their 3 favorites are
1.) Appeal to emotion
2.) Tu qou qou
3.) Ad hominem
The homie @LaRaider85 says that they can understand logical fallacies yet they dont care that they commit them.
This was deep to me because the reason I viewed women as inferior is because I thought their brain could not actually understand logic. If LaRaider is correct then the truth is even worse.
They understand that they are being illogical but they just dont care. Thats the definition of evil.
" Hell is the impossibilty of reason" ...Oliver Stone/Platoon
Yet female lawyers use logical fallacies in their personal life. In fact women almost exclusively argue in logical fallacies.
Their 3 favorites are
1.) Appeal to emotion
2.) Tu qou qou
3.) Ad hominem
The homie @LaRaider85 says that they can understand logical fallacies yet they dont care that they commit them.
This was deep to me because the reason I viewed women as inferior is because I thought their brain could not actually understand logic. If LaRaider is correct then the truth is even worse.
They understand that they are being illogical but they just dont care. Thats the definition of evil.
" Hell is the impossibilty of reason" ...Oliver Stone/Platoon
Last edited: