There's billions of women on the planet. The likelihood is very high. Last I checked, majority of traditional countries in the world still don't have women getting tattoos.
My post is referring to western women and the u.s more specifically.
Nearly 50% of all millennial women have a tattoo. Gen z in the 18-24 age group as of 2022 is roughly 37% percent tatted.
Alot of Gen z isn't old enough to get tatted yet and one look at a girl in her early 20s dating profile, social media there are tats. There are **** tons of articles and studies about the rise of tattoos all the way back in 2012 American women outnumbered men in tattoos percentage. They are not going away literally and figuratively. And if the younger generation is learning from the older why are we seeing a steep increase in tattooed individuals amongst generation z? Seems if anything modern trends and social media has furthered prompted both young men and women to get tatted. About 46% of young people in the U.s are tatted and the trend is only going up. I'm only interested in women 18-28, and a large portion of women in my demo have tats, I got over it.
Gen Z and Millennials, Tattoos, Tattoo Culture, Semi-permanent tattoos, Millennial parents, Self-care, TikTok, Micro tattoos
www.ypulse.com
According to a recent surveys conducted in the United States, tattoos were common the most among Millennials.
www.statista.com
They won't. Women are stupid in the short term, but they know when to see consequences. The ones with tats will try the hardest to hide or remove them. The future generation of women, like always, learn from the mistakes of the old one.
Calling women stupid doesn't really help your argument and this is a 'change my view' thread with the intent of opposing OP's existing viewpoint. Based on current metrics most lose their virginity in their late teens early 20s, after 25 virginity is estimated to be around 5-12% in the states. I don't think this metric is necessarily dead on since measuring virginity is near impossible and many young men are sexless virgins/incel especially since covid, but I digress... If you want to hold out for a virgin girl to wife up by all means go for it, but if you live in America or the west at large that is finding a needle in a hay stack. You wanna go out East? different story, but western influence is global and has been since imperialism.
Those who don’t have sex during their teen years are in the minority, but the reasons for—and effects of—waiting differ for everyone.
www.theatlantic.com
The reason tats is high rn in the west is because we took over the church and replaced it with the church of degeneracy. Lost of values with no powerful men to keep them in check.
I like your idea of "church of degeneracy", but i'd just say that's the collapse of Western society at large. Yes, I think a lack of religion and morality has led western civilization down its current path and is contributing factor, but I don't see how having a tattoo is 'immoral'. If we wanna get RedPill Rollo has talked at length about female virginity and how you shouldn't only seek out virgin women for marriage and relationships. It drastically lowers your dating pool since very very few women are virgins, that and if they know you want a virgin THEY WILL LIE if they aren't.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-
-Example-
You meet a great girl, you vet her right, she looks great, sexual chemistry and you enjoy spending time with her, she is relationship material. One day you see she's got a little cross tattoo on her ankle you never noticed.
So what? she's gone? You're done? That is downright silly. I think most guys that are so obsessively hung up on a girl's notch count or tattoo are insecure and sexually unsuccessful. If she's tatted head to toe then yeah I'm not bringing her home to moma,
but I might still have fun with her in other ways... Same thing if she's a 304, high notch count girlfriend material? No probably not, but can do other things....
Red flags should be warning signs and to be acknowledged but after actually getting to know a person regardless of the relationship context red flags often change color. A red flag should give you a serious pause and reflection, if something is a genuine deal breaker then cut the cord, if it isn't ride it out and ask yourself why you cared to begin with? Reflection and reassessing your own thoughts and feelings are a necessary part of growth, few do it. (see Robert Greene) What would have been a
'red flag' to me in my AFC days wouldn't even phase me now. Why? Because I change and life changes. That dumb drunk 22 year old college girl that got a tat on her wrist won't remain that same girl when she's 30.
Should you acknowledge the poor decision making of her past,
yes! Should it be the sole determinant in her eligibility for a relationship?
Up to you. Should that same girl look into your past and judge you for stupid things you've done? Sure, its up to her just the same.
Mind you I am simply putting forth a viewpoint in opposition to op,
that is what a change my view thread is.
The purpose is to get one to reflect and address their own existing mental schemas. I personally as previously stated
do not like tattoos, but I am not going to disqualify someone based on that alone. I will acknowledge it, consider it and keep it in the back of my mind, but I'm not going to judge a book by its cover. If it is a deal breaker for someone then that's fine, everyone has their limits and are entitled to feel how they want to feel, I respect that. I
f anything most modern men need to have more standards and boundaries from the get go.
I oppose it entirely, and my pool of women is still fine.
Nice man, If the getting is good for you and you feel so strongly about these things then by all means "you do you". Nothing wrong with that at all. I respect it
