Transform Your Dating Life in Minutes

If you're looking for a proven system to attract women and achieve dating success, you're in the right place.

Our step-by-step guide is the perfect starting point for any man looking to improve his dating life.

With our expert advice and strategies, you'll be able to overcome common obstacles, build confidence, and start attracting the women you desire.

Thanks for joining us, and I wish you all the best on your path to success!

Women becoming "enraged" for being photographed or videoed in public is at an all time high

BackInTheGame78

Moderator
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
14,963
Reaction score
16,226
Keep reading stories about how women are confronting men and "making them" delete photos they take in public of them, etc. Being creepy, suspicious or offending is NOT ILLEGAL. Telling someone they "have to" delete a photo they took because you don't like it and then starting to try and take their phone and do it is considered assault and THEY are the ones who would be doing something illegal.


Firstly they should take a law course because there is NOTHING illegal about photographing or video taping someone in public. It is protected under the constitution and courts have many times upheld there is no expectation of privacy in public, and in most cases, public places like gyms, bars or restaurants, malls, etc unless it is prohibited by them.

They call the police, throw hissy fits, etc because they don't "like" something or become offended by it but the police are not here to enforce their feelings, their morality, or their beliefs, they are there to enforce the LAW. And the law is quite clear. If you can see it from a public location, you can photograph or videotape it. Now audio recording is actually a little trickier because it could fall under eavesdropping statues and it MIGHT actually be illegal...which is ridiculous considering that if you are videotaping you will have audio as well. Clearly these statutes have not been updated to deal with technology advances.

Sometimes I feel like I just want to go out and start doing things like this so I can educate these idiots on how the law actually works. Sadly, many times the police need educating on how the law actually works as well if you ever have watched any first amendment audit videos on YouTube and see how they behave.

Additionally, unless you live in a Stop and ID state, you NEVER have to comply with a police officer randomly stopping you and asking for your ID. Same if you are a passenger in a car that is stopped for a traffic violation. They have no legal right to ask for ID for a passenger. They can ask but you can refuse. They have no legal right to see your ID unless they have reasonable articulable suspicion(aka RAS) that you have committed, are in the process of committing or are about to commit a crime.

So if you are ever in a situation where a cop stops you randomly and asks for your ID for no reason, tell them NO. Police rely on people not knowing their rights under the law so they can infringe upon them.

Other common things police routinely try to do that they have no legal right to do and you can refuse:

- search your vehicle(unless they see something in plain sight that warrants a search like open containers of alcohol or drugs)

- enter your house without a warrant(unless they feel someone is in danger)

- search your person without cause(Terry v Ohio ruling allows them to pat down for weapons tho)

- demand you follow an unlawful order, which simply means an order you are not legally obligated to follow

- force you to answer ANY questions or threaten to arrest you for hindering or obstructing their investigation by not doing so. You are under no legal obligation to answer anything they ask other than very basic things OR help with their investigation of you. Obstruction of justice in almost every state requires someone doing something physically OR willfully lying to the police.

However you MUST tell them you are invoking your right to remain silent verbally to be sure you are protected. Simply remaining silent could in some cases be seen as an admission of guilt in some states.

- acting suspicious and illegally detaining you. Suspicious behavior is not a felony or a misdemeanor and therefore is NOT ILLEGAL. Unless they can tell you what crime they suspect you of committing they have no right to detain you for longer than a reasonable amount of time to complete their investigation, which again you are under no obligation to help with.

- giving them your ID so they can 'check' to see if you have any warrants. Unless you have committed a crime or some sort of traffic violation they have no legal basis for obtaining your ID.
 
Last edited:

espanish

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
413
Reaction score
308
Age
42
big fan of those first amendment videos. I have a feeling most cops know the law, they just act dumb. also I have a feeling cops have a quota of arrests to meet. that's why they are so hungry for ID. all they want to do is find a way to arrest you. one time I was reporting a battery that was committed against me and the cop was trying to find a way to arrest me. of course, cops hate cameras and cameramen because when there are cameras they can't plant the evidence they were going to plant and they can't lie anymore. I think you are wrong about terry, I think they need reasonable suspicion you have a weapon or contraband to pat you down. but at the end of the day, none of these matter, I believe there is no constitution just like I believe there is no game. what are you going to do if a cop arrests you for refusing to ID? spend $200k in attorney fees just to lose due to qualified immunity? you do realize J6 defendants got no due process and they were just thrown in jail? what happened to right to a speedy trial? what happened to cruel and unusual punishment?
regarding those crazy women that freak out over someone filming in public, I hate it when they say "you can't film her, she is a minor" lol wtf does age have to do with it.
 

BackInTheGame78

Moderator
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
14,963
Reaction score
16,226
big fan of those first amendment videos. I have a feeling most cops know the law, they just act dumb. also I have a feeling cops have a quota of arrests to meet. that's why they are so hungry for ID. all they want to do is find a way to arrest you. one time I was reporting a battery that was committed against me and the cop was trying to find a way to arrest me. of course, cops hate cameras and cameramen because when there are cameras they can't plant the evidence they were going to plant and they can't lie anymore. I think you are wrong about terry, I think they need reasonable suspicion you have a weapon or contraband to pat you down. but at the end of the day, none of these matter, I believe there is no constitution just like I believe there is no game. what are you going to do if a cop arrests you for refusing to ID? spend $200k in attorney fees just to lose due to qualified immunity? you do realize J6 defendants got no due process and they were just thrown in jail? what happened to right to a speedy trial? what happened to cruel and unusual punishment?
regarding those crazy women that freak out over someone filming in public, I hate it when they say "you can't film her, she is a minor" lol wtf does age have to do with it.
You wouldn't need to spend any money if they arrested you for not giving ID. The threat of a lawsuit against the police department and the city would be enough to make the district attorney decline to prosecute and the police department issue an apology with haste.

And you are right about Terry...

"Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime."

However, I believe in practice courts give them a pretty wide berth on that due to the dangers they are facing on a regular basis now so their burden of "reasonably suspect" is pretty low.
 
Top