Eating healthy... but it's a hassle

[BackInTheGame78]

Which studies are these?
Consumed too often compared to what?
Which kind of red meat?

These same studies also said eggs raise serum cholesterol (they don’t) or that cholesterol itself causes heart disease (it doesn’t).

They believe it is related to changes in gut bacteria and/or the byproducts they produce from digesting red meat. The more red meat eaten, the higher levels of these bacteria you are creating and the more byproducts/toxins they produce.

Increased heart disease risk from red meat may stem from gut microbe response to digestion

Embargoed until 4 a.m. CT/5 a.m. ET Monday, August 1, 2022 Research Highlights: A new study found that chemicals produced in the digestive tract by gut microbes after eating red meat (such as beef, pork, bison, venison) explained a significant portion ...

newsroom.heart.org

.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Hi Anonymous,
Don't want to take the bubbles out of anyones Champagne but despite the great nutritional value of Red Meat best not burn it...Charred meat is implicated in high cancer risks....Your own FDA suggests marinating meat for six hours in Wine which you get rid of....Sure the flavour suffers but it is worth it.

The FDA should not be looked at for any type of advice. The assumption is they have consumers best interests in mind. They don't. They have big pharma's best interests in mind. In fact the FDA is one of the most sinister organizations on the planet in my opinion.

The plan from the FDA is basically how to ensure as many people become dependant on medication as quickly as possible with it increasing as each decade of their life goes by. I have heard they want one new medication per decade of your life...so 1 by age 10, 2 by 20, 8 by 80, etc...

They obviously act to block seriously dangerous stuff that will kill people, because deaths do not help people become life long customers of big pharma, who basically has them in their pockets.

I suggest you read up on the FDA and their "decisions". You'll find the majority of them have questionable motives.

For instance...why do they still allow calcium to be added indiscriminately to the food supply once it was found out that more calcium does NOT prevent osteoporosis, which is why it was allowed and the reasoning for it, and actually many times causes it to become WORSE? There is NO VALID reason for them to allow added calcium anymore. It creates far more issues than it solves, and they are well aware of it.

But they allow it because this sets up people for many other diseases, including autoimmune diseases, heart disease, atherosclerosis, etc slowly over the course of time which allows Big Pharma to profit hugely over the course of their life.

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

FDA and all medical/govt authorities are worthless when it comes to nutrition science.

Red meat is not bad for you, it's a superfood. All the "science" is based on poorly done epidiemological studies (self-reported surveys and analysis of data). Then they draw correlations from it and pass it off as scientific fact (not accounting for cofounding variables such as red meat eaters being more likely to smoke cigarettes).

Laughable.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

FDA and all medical/govt authorities are worthless when it comes to nutrition science.

Red meat is not bad for you, it's a superfood. All the "science" is based on poorly done epidiemological studies (self-reported surveys and analysis of data). Then they draw correlations from it and pass it off as scientific fact (not accounting for cofounding variables such as red meat eaters being more likely to smoke cigarettes).

Laughable.

Red meat can be bad for you depending on where it comes from.

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

Red meat can be bad for you depending on where it comes from.

It can be bad for you for the same reason any other factory farmed meat is bad for you. Factory farmed chickens are arguably even worse.