FlexpertHamilton
Master Don Juan
In this context I mean things like, cooking, picking up the tab, planning dates, small favors, "nurturing", giving rides, etc none of which are mutually exclusive with leading.
At first glance it seems like men should be taking care of the women, but on further examination it screams "provider" and framing her as a queen.
If a woman voluntarily "takes care of you" while you're still leading and in control, it seems perfect to me. You don't have anything to prove, you know your presence is enough. That's not to say you can't or shouldn't do things for her (like an oil change), merely that they never be done with any ulterior motive ie gaining her affection/approval, and doing them because you genuinely want to.
At first glance it seems like men should be taking care of the women, but on further examination it screams "provider" and framing her as a queen.
If a woman voluntarily "takes care of you" while you're still leading and in control, it seems perfect to me. You don't have anything to prove, you know your presence is enough. That's not to say you can't or shouldn't do things for her (like an oil change), merely that they never be done with any ulterior motive ie gaining her affection/approval, and doing them because you genuinely want to.