Is rapid sex similar to the gay sexual scene?

[HaleyBaron]

I heard a unique talking point earlier that all the rampant sex we have today is due in part to the rampant sex that happens in the gay community. As a result, all the sex that women are having is potentially due in part because of the symptoms of this sexual revolution that occurred. As a result, it is leading to the same consequences that the gay community had: diseases, immorality, and lost of purpose.

Unfortunately this also led to a similarity that men ****ing many women is considered degenerate. I think this is a wrong way to look at it. There is a huge difference between straight men ****ing a lot of women, a straight man ****ing some women, a straight man ****ing only one woman at a time, and a gay man who ****s many men [most gay men have multiple sex partners]. It will be interesting to decipher the dynamics of this entire thing.

In my opinion, I don't believe straight men ****ing a lot is degenerate. It's part of our DNA. I think what this really shows is that females ****ing around is way worse for their gender than ours.

 

[Hamurabimbi]

I doubt many straight men are conversant with the ‘gay sex scene’.

 

[HaleyBaron]

I doubt many straight men are conversant with the ‘gay sex scene’.

We have women and psychologists for that.

 

[Barrister]

When you say "rapid sex" is this just synonymous with people having a lot of sex with multiple partners?

I don't think its degenerate and is, in fact, very natural for men. And I have no idea on how it affects the gay community. I can say that sleeping with many women has affected me - in both positive and negative ways. Positive in that I have experienced true abundance and understand I won't ever be alone and I have a great sense of security from that; positive in that some of the fairy tell blue pill bullsh1t that I used to believe in has been dispelled. Negative; I do not feel as heavily invested emotionally in my LTR, with ostensibly a hotter and more down to earth woman than I ever had an LTR with before, as I did in my LTRs in my younger days; negative in that I have a tendency to want to eject immediately at even the slightest issue coming up in said LTR.

For women - I can see similar negative effects. I do think it impacts them to much greater extents than men. I also think that mentally they tend to experience much more intense disassociative thought patterns as a result of many partners. Sometimes you get a chicken and egg type situation, since I believe most women who have very high notch counts tend to be Cluster B anyway.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Women have been doing this since time began. They are simply much more discreet about it and rarely get caught when they do it.

Even when they studied primates where they thought they mated for life, it was found both members would have sexual encounters with someone other than their partner randomly which shocked them.

 

[HaleyBaron]

When you say "rapid sex" is this just synonymous with people having a lot of sex with multiple partners?

I don't think its degenerate and is, in fact, very natural for men. And I have no idea on how it affects the gay community. I can say that sleeping with many women has affected me - in both positive and negative ways. Positive in that I have experienced true abundance and understand I won't ever be alone and I have a great sense of security from that; positive in that some of the fairy tell blue pill bullsh1t that I used to believe in has been dispelled. Negative; I do not feel as heavily invested emotionally in my LTR, with ostensibly a hotter and more down to earth woman than I ever had an LTR with before, as I did in my LTRs in my younger days; negative in that I have a tendency to want to eject immediately at even the slightest issue coming up in said LTR.

For women - I can see similar negative effects. I do think it impacts them to much greater extents than men. I also think that mentally they tend to experience much more intense disassociative thought patterns as a result of many partners. Sometimes you get a chicken and egg type situation, since I believe most women who have very high notch counts tend to be Cluster B anyway.

I had this with a few of my girls over the years. They wanted to tie me down more despite us being just nsa ****s. I was fine ****ing other women, but they got hung up when they saw me out with other women. I don't think it's possible for a woman to accept it at all without being mentally damaged or insane.

 

[Dr.Suave]

I don´t think its degenrate fro straight men to bang a lot of different women but at the same time it disappoints me how hard it is to find virgin girls.

 

[HaleyBaron]

I don´t think its degenrate fro straight men to bang a lot of different women but at the same time it disappoints me how hard it is to find virgin girls.

Is it sad that the only virgins Ive found so far were butt ugly that no one wanted to **** them?

 

[Zimbabwe]

Women have been doing this since time began. They are simply much more discreet about it and rarely get caught when they do it.

Even when they studied primates where they thought they mated for life, it was found both members would have sexual encounters with someone other than their partner randomly which shocked them.

Why are so many members on this forum spreading pseudo-science

While females (or whoever experiences gestation and thus puts more time into offspring) are biologically more monogamous, males (or those who do not experience gestation or those who can easily and quickly contribute to reproduction) are biologically more polygamous.

Our DNA shows that we have twice as many female ancestors then male.

 

[Dr.Suave]

Is it sad that the only virgins Ive found so far were butt ugly that no one wanted to **** them?

I guess it is. Met a few of those myself. Back in my younger days, it wasnt that hard to find a bangable virgin. But as we grow older it gets harder every day.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Why are so many members on this forum spreading pseudo-science

While females (or whoever experiences gestation and thus puts more time into offspring) are biologically more monogamous, males (or those who do not experience gestation or those who can easily and quickly contribute to reproduction) are biologically more polygamous.

Our DNA shows that we have twice as many female ancestors then male.

New studies don't bear out these theories

 

[Zimbabwe]

New studies don't bear out these theories

Only theories that align with your beliefs are valid?

 

[sangheilios]

Why are so many members on this forum spreading pseudo-science

While females (or whoever experiences gestation and thus puts more time into offspring) are biologically more monogamous, males (or those who do not experience gestation or those who can easily and quickly contribute to reproduction) are biologically more polygamous.

Our DNA shows that we have twice as many female ancestors then male.

I partially agree with you but there are other factors that you are not considering. During stone age/prehistoric times the men were the individuals primarily engaging in hunting, and many animals that were around back then were more than capable of killing a full grown man with little effort. Something else to factor in is conflict with other tribes, groups of people, etc. I recall reading this article quite a while ago that said around a third of bones found in stone age Europe had shown signs of physical trauma, suggesting they experienced a violent death. Another article I remember reading about a while ago was from Germany, where they had found this mass grave of skeletons, again stone age, where they had their hands positioned in a manner that suggested they had their hands tied behind their backs. The interesting thing was that they were all male adults. I feel that evidence like this can easily show why there would be more female ancestors than male.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Only theories that align with your beliefs are valid?

You simply spout theories that sound good but have been disproven.

Female monogamy is fiction, not fact, Hrdy says — Harvard Gazette

Women are naturally monogamous. Men tend to rove. That assumption is not only part of popular belief, it has also been enshrined by science. Darwin, writing of animal mating habits,…

news.harvard.edu

 

[Zimbabwe]

You simply spout theories that sound good but have been disproven.

Female monogamy is fiction, not fact, Hrdy says — Harvard Gazette

Women are naturally monogamous. Men tend to rove. That assumption is not only part of popular belief, it has also been enshrined by science. Darwin, writing of animal mating habits,…

news.harvard.edu

That's not a study, that's literally just an article. There is no sample or peer review done. It's just someones opinion.

If we look at genetic data, we can see that we have twice as many female ancestors from pur mitochondrial dna compared to our male ancestors from our Y dna.

I partially agree with you but there are other factors that you are not considering. During stone age/prehistoric times the men were the individuals primarily engaging in hunting, and many animals that were around back then were more than capable of killing a full grown man with little effort. Something else to factor in is conflict with other tribes, groups of people, etc. I recall reading this article quite a while ago that said around a third of bones found in stone age Europe had shown signs of physical trauma, suggesting they experienced a violent death. Another article I remember reading about a while ago was from Germany, where they had found this mass grave of skeletons, again stone age, where they had their hands positioned in a manner that suggested they had their hands tied behind their backs. The interesting thing was that they were all male adults. I feel that evidence like this can easily show why there would be more female ancestors than male.

Yes humans evolved this way due to our environment, we are all shaped by our environment. Most men were killed off while the few who lived had multiple wives.

 

[sangheilios]

@HaleyBaron

I'm basing this off of observations of mine over the years. I don't really think it is quite natural or normal for women as a collective to be highly sexually active with multiple men, whether that is in a given time frame or just througjout her life. A woman is biologically trying to find the best men she can find, both biologically and in regards to their resources, etc. When women have sex there is a chance of them getting pregnant, their instincts and biology are aware of this, and it is not in her best interest to do so with just any man that comes around, thus the reason why females are generally the pickier of the sexes. However, there are obviously exceptions to this.

There have always been things like prostitutes, the town *****, or any other type of female that sleeps around. There are some specific things that go into this, for prostitutes it's very often about money and using it for drugs. With *****s that are like this without a financial or resource dependent outcome, I feel there are some personality characteristics going on here. Some of the women that I've known of that sleep with tons of men with little to no screening involved are generally very off and might actually have some mental health issues. Something else to keep in mind is that in the past such behavior was actively looked down upon and shamed, whereas now it's not only accepted but encouraged.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

That's not a study, that's literally just an article. There is no sample or peer review done. It's just someones opinion.

If we look at genetic data, we can see that we have twice as many female ancestors from pur mitochondrial dna compared to our male ancestors from our Y dna.


Yes humans evolved this way due to our environment, we are all shaped by our environment. Most men were killed off while the few who lived had multiple wives.

From someone with a PhD at Harvard in Anthropology, which is the study of humans.

Don't take offense if I put far more value in what their opinion is over yours.

Here is a study basically saying the same thing...that humans are socially rather than sexually monogamous.

Are Men and Women Socially or Sexually Monogamous? | European Psychiatry | Cambridge Core

Are Men and Women Socially or Sexually Monogamous? - Volume 30 Issue S1

www.cambridge.org

 

[Zimbabwe]

From someone with a PhD at Harvard in Anthropology, which is the study of humans.

Don't take offense if I put far more value in what their opinion is over yours.

Here is a study basically saying the same thing...that humans are socially rather than sexually monogamous.

Are Men and Women Socially or Sexually Monogamous? | European Psychiatry | Cambridge Core

Are Men and Women Socially or Sexually Monogamous? - Volume 30 Issue S1

www.cambridge.org

Dude do you even read the links you post? It gives animal examples of polygamy, it does not give any link between decreased sexual activity and monogamy in humans.

Also if you read the end of the journal you can see it says

On the other hand, most men and women by the age of 40 will be married, in order to achieve safety, permanence, a better care for offspring and pooling resources. Such a social monogamy is generally accompanied by the expectation of sexual monogamy. Is it possible to combine a happy long-term marriage that keeps sexuality alive?

 

[sangheilios]

If we look at genetic data, we can see that we have twice as many female ancestors from pur mitochondrial dna compared to our male ancestors from our Y dna.


Yes humans evolved this way due to our environment, we are all shaped by our environment. Most men were killed off while the few who lived had multiple wives.

Good examples to use that would provide an insight into this would be to look towards hunter gatherer type societies that have existed within the past couple centuries, as they would be fairly comparable to stone age people.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Dude do you even read the links you post? It gives animal examples of polygamy, it does not give any link between decreased sexual activity and monogamy in humans.

Also if you read the end of the journal you can see it says

Yes...the expectation of sexual monogamy.