They could had always gone to CCBill if they wanted a porn approved CC provider. I think they want to raise a lot of money and possibly go public. That's the reason it seems to be.
Uh, they would need to stop the blatant sexual discrimination in conscription before they could address this.
It's ok. They can just work as prostitutes. All of the simps that sent them money are potential clients.‘I Feel Used’: OnlyFans Made Millions Off Sex Workers’ Labor, Then Hung Them Out To Dry
A sudden policy change that will ban "sexually explicit" material from OnlyFans threatens to upend the lives of those who made the platform successful.www.huffpost.com
www.axios.com
You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
OnlyFans chicks view their johns like a regular chick views her Beta orbitors - there for the benefit without having to put out a hard product (i.e., actual physical contact). That said, any chick on OnlyFans is going to get used to the money, and if the only way to get the money is to physically perform the contact stimulation, they'll do it. It should be said that stripping is an intermediate situation between OnlyFans/camming & "physically performing ..." (of course, this runs the gamut from the "look but don't touch" virginal strippers and the lapdancers who are only separated from the john's juices by a layer of fleece sweat pants or cotton athletic shorts
- typically such strippers find their way to the clubs that match their level of hustle).
They are trying to walk the tightrope of being respectable enough so that the banks aren't shamed by doing business with them, and being raunchy enough so they continue to have revenue. The bottom line is that nothing motivates men to spend money like T&A poon.Caved -
OnlyFans reverses porn ban, users remain skeptical
OnlyFans is pumping the breaks on its controversial decision to ban pornography, but the damage may already be done to the content subscription service.finance.yahoo.com
This is the debate we're having in the west. About whether women should be allowed to monetize their pusses on the internet. Meanwhile the Taliban...They are trying to walk the tightrope of being respectable enough so that the banks aren't shamed by doing business with them, and being raunchy enough so they continue to have revenue. The bottom line is that nothing motivates men to spend money like T&A poon.
I think that, believe it or not, our femynist friends decrying how important these income streams are to women have very quickly turned the cultural tide; it's them vs. the goody-too-shoes columnists like the NYT's Nicholas Kristof, who wrote the seminal editorial about how all these porn sites had revenge/oppressed porn with the blessings of the banks.
Here is that seminal editorial:
Opinion | The Children of Pornhub (Published 2020)
Why does Canada allow this company to profit off videos of exploitation and assault?www.nytimes.com
Here is a great article about what a media hoar this author is:Here is that seminal editorial:
Opinion | The Children of Pornhub (Published 2020)
Why does Canada allow this company to profit off videos of exploitation and assault?
newrepublic.com
