Well that kinda reminds the last scene from the first terminator when sara destroy the machine in that facility trapping it.
Btw where you rooting for the woman or the man while watching the movie?
To be fair, I didn't watch this full movie awake. It held my attention for the first 10 minutes then lost me then I awoke somewhere by the last 30 minutes when there was a guy in a chair reading a note and was about to get burned. I found that very disturbing and unnecessary cruel. I decided the movie, based on certain video reviews and overall score, is not worth watching at this time because its level of violence goes below my sensibilities of taste. One video reviewer claimed she could not stomach watching it beyond the 44 minute mark and dismissed the movie as torture porn, and reviewer (which was a guy) discouraged people from going out to the theater to watch this movie because the pay-off is too small because of the level of violence that the audience has to sit through. So, my issue with this movie is it comes across as too violent, sort of like Nocturnal Animals (2016), and its too realistic compared to a slasher movie which is usually more comical.
From what I did see, notably the opening and last 30 minutes, of course, I rooted for the lady and the boy, in the same manner I would root for the Sarah and John Connor against the Terminator. We don't care that the Terminator is a guy over a metal endoskeleton, because it's not human, its a robot. With me the man portrayed by Russel Crowe in Unhinged comes like an Arnie Terminator movie (where Arnie is the bad terminator of course!) because the guy is displaying super-human strength and someone starts losing their humanity when you start shooting at them and injuring them and they are still continuing like they are a robot from the Terminator franchise. So, without seeing the full movie awake and just essentially looking at the last act, this was a terminator movie and I rooted for the lady and her son.
But, to be fair with you, there is this other movie called 'Red Eye' (2005), where the male villain portrayed by Cililan Murphy was just evil. It was better made, wasn't over the top like this movie, and this portrayed guys in a very negative way. You can't say its a woke movie because its made in 2005. The screen-writer who made Red Eye also made Unhinged, who is Carl Ellsworth. He also wrote Disturbia (2007).
There are women screen-writers, who also portray women in a bad way, such as Gillian Flynn with Gone Girl (2014) and Sharp Objects (2018).
So if you want to attack a movie as being feminist where the screen-play was written by a white man, rather than a woman, then, my guess is you are just reading too much into this. Why would a white man put a screen-play designed to demonize white men like you are suggesting?
