Is this how easy it was in the 80's?

[Lynx nkaf]

If she's gay the scientists sent the wrong woman

When do you go from straight to gay?
The sexual act?

It may or may not have been easier in the 80's to come out. That's when I grew up 7 yrs old to 17 yrs old.

 

[Jack12345]

When do you go from straight to gay?
The sexual act?

Childhood

 

[Jack12345]

It may or may not have been easier in the 80's to come out. That's when I grew up 7 yrs old to 17 yrs old.

One need to embrace his sexuality for whatever it is, just not say the word bi.

A gay can be a straight, a straight cannot be gay

 

[derby1]

Like this:

View attachment 4416
View attachment 4417

or this:

View attachment 4418

As for myself, I don't think I'd kick the upper ones out of my bed.

I meant male russian shotputter ,

 

[SW15]

every time that I take a casual walk outside and seeing women walking or running with the earbuds in, I think about how mating opportunities are missed. Even when their earbuds aren't in, their heads are often down and they are playing with their phones. They just aren't receptive to approaches. What I just described didn't happen in the mid-2000s or 1980s. Also, more single women have dogs now than in the past. While out walking the dog, the dog can sometimes detract attention from an approach or make it more difficult to actually do an approach because the woman will be preoccupied with her dog's needs.

A lot of dog walkers these days. Has there ever been a society that walks animals as much as middle America? Lol
I know a dog lady. Has 5 dogs and she can barely handle 1

Dog ownership has gone up over the years. Millennials have been the most dog obsessed generation to ever exist in the United States. A lot of women prioritize their dogs over developing something with men. I have done 2 street approaches this week where the women kept moving with their dogs.

Also, the pattern of dog ownership for women has changed. For the Boomers and about the first 2/3rds of Gen X, people coupled up first, got the suburban single family home and then got the dog. I think this changed with late Gen X'ers. With Millennials, it has been quite the opposite. Millennial women prioritize getting the dog first. Dogs seem to be the be-all, end-all for Millennials.

Then there are the cat women.

 

[RickTheToad]

It turns out my wifes estranged father (a 5"3 ginger manlet) has children from different women all over the country

I am struggling to see this in 2020. 5"3 ginger manlets would be lucky to bang even one landwhale today

Yet my wife's mother was rather attractive judging by old photographs and he managed to knock her up and many others too

Pre-Tinder sounds like easy mode

Prob. easer as there was lesser selections and no OLD. So yea, a short turd could get laid. Nowadays, sure, to a midget.

 

[MatureDJ]

I meant male russian shotputter ,

 

[MatureDJ]

One need to embrace his sexuality for whatever it is, just not say the word bi.

A gay can be a straight, a straight cannot be gay

Andrew Dice Clay begs to differ:

 

[Jack12345]

Andrew Dice Clay begs to differ:

Lol I don't know this guy. I like the part when he talks about black guys not being gay

2020: gay af

 

[Scars]

I was born at the tail end of the 80s, so I can't really speak on that.. However, even I can see a huge difference in culture from the 90s/early 2000s up until now. I still remember a time when kids actually went outside and played, and technology didn't control our lives. Computers existed, but they were very slow and not everyone could afford one. I think the best time period (dating wise) for me, was during the Myspace era. It was incredibly easy to bang chicks, and there was no "#metoo" BS. Men didn't have to worry about catching a sexual harassment charge just for making a joke. Drunk sex that you ended up regretting in the morning wasn't "rape".. men could be men and society wouldn't shame them for it. It's crazy to think how even 10-15 years ago things have changed so much. Everyone is so worried about cancel culture and pissing off the twitter warriors.. It's like everyone is turning into a bunch of pvssies. I hate it.

 

[Jack12345]

Everyone is so worried about cancel culture and pissing off the twitter warriors.. It's like everyone is turning into a bunch of pvssies. I hate it.

I guess this is a good note. If everyone turns into pussies, that means more women seek for dycks. Just need keep focusing.

 

[SW15]

I was born at the tail end of the 80s, so I can't really speak on that.. However, even I can see a huge difference in culture from the 90s/early 2000s up until now. I still remember a time when kids actually went outside and played, and technology didn't control our lives. Computers existed, but they were very slow and not everyone could afford one. I think the best time period (dating wise) for me, was during the Myspace era. It was incredibly easy to bang chicks, and there was no "#metoo" BS. Men didn't have to worry about catching a sexual harassment charge just for making a joke. Drunk sex that you ended up regretting in the morning wasn't "rape".. men could be men and society wouldn't shame them for it. It's crazy to think how even 10-15 years ago things have changed so much. Everyone is so worried about cancel culture and pissing off the twitter warriors.. It's like everyone is turning into a bunch of pvssies. I hate it.

I was born in the mid-1980s. I don't remember much of the 1980s. My formative years were in the 1990s. Playing outdoors was on the wane for children in the 1990s, but it was still more prevalent at that time than I imagine it would be today. Video games started to get big in the 1990s, and childhood obesity was getting started then, though childhood and adulthood obesity was less frequently observed then. Broadband internet didn't become prevalent in households until the early 2000s. Super slow dial up internet was a leading internet source in the 1990s, and dial up limited what you could do online.

I agree with you on the MySpace era. I talked about 2003/04-06 earlier in this thread. While 2003-06 was no Golden Age of dating, it was certainly better than what we have today. Technology has de-personalized the process and encouraged ruder behavior. Flaking and ghosting were rare because there was no text messaging. Text messaging enables people to be gutless wimps. People were getting cell phones then but the cell phone were primarily used for making phone calls while out and about, which is a perfectly good use of the technology. The change from being tethered to a landline to get a phone call to being able to get phone calls anywhere was a big advance and needed. Text messaging is useful for those with hearing problems, but for the non disabled, it has done a lot of harm. Text messaging has worsened the mating environment. Swipe apps just accentuated all of the bad trends that existed with the website era of online dating. Having other apps, fast internet web browsing on a phone, and text messaging to virtually communicate with anyone at any time, made people have worse interpersonal social skills. People aren't present in the moment a lot of time, which is important in relational formation. Due to the existance of text messaging, women can be completely gutless, not telling you anything and delivering undesirable news in a gutless way behind an electronic screen. The mamby pamby, candy asssed text message of "I had a good time but do not see things going anywhere" became a thing for some women after first dates to allay their self image that they aren't rude, but doing that as opposed to saying something in person is still a chicken shiit maneuver. Compared to the candy asssed text message I just mentioned, I would rather deal with ghosting. Ghosting is chicken shiit but at least it is honest.

2004-05 was my senior year of college and I entered the work force that year. #MeToo didn't exist in 2005. In 2005, it still wasn't advisable to date immediate coworkers if you worked in a white collar, office job. If you worked in a larger company in 2005, it was probably easier to date someone in a distant department where interaction was infrequent. However, in companies of less than 75 people, dating intra-conpany was perilous then, just as it is now. In 2005, you still had to be careful about sexual harrassment allegations, but it is worse today.

Fake rape charges after drunken sex were a nothing in the mid-2000s, but certainly seemed to accelerate after 2010.

I think when people are forced to be real with each other in person in the absence of technology, there's a healthier mating environment than what you see now. The bar scene, which left a lot to be desired, was still better than swipe apps because it forced people to interact with each other in person. 2003-06 was the last gasp of the pre-tech everywhere era.

 

[Dash Riprock]

Andrew Dice Clay begs to differ:

The Diceman was the BEST!

 

[Lookatu]

Also, the pattern of dog ownership for women has changed. For the Boomers and about the first 2/3rds of Gen X, people coupled up first, got the suburban single family home and then got the dog. I think this changed with late Gen X'ers. With Millennials, it has been quite the opposite. Millennial women prioritize getting the dog first. Dogs seem to be the be-all, end-all for Millennials.

I agree.

In addition, people used to get dogs originally for protection and security, then additional companionship to join the family. Now women get them as their primary partner in life due to many reasons but most of them the wrong ones. I see power hungry women have dogs because they can control everything that the dog does and the dog will not run away or bark back at the women. It's very telling how some women control or discipline their dogs into her mindset. Then there are lonely women that do not want to exert the same level of effort into a real man/woman relationship as they do with their dogs. Once again, a certain level of control, loyalty, and somewhat imprisonment mentality at work here.

It's sad when women treat their dogs better than humans, which is what you see a lot of these days...

My apologies for going off tangent as this could be it's own thread.

 

[SW15]

My apologies for going off tangent as this could be it's own thread.

I will make it a thread right now. Hold on. I'd recommend copying and pasting your previous response in the new thread. It is a really good tangent.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

I agree.

In addition, people used to get dogs originally for protection and security, then additional companionship to join the family. Now women get them as their primary partner in life due to many reasons but most of them the wrong ones. I see power hungry women have dogs because they can control everything that the dog does and the dog will not run away or bark back at the women. It's very telling how some women control or discipline their dogs into her mindset. Then there are lonely women that do not want to exert the same level of effort into a real man/woman relationship as they do with their dogs. Once again, a certain level of control, loyalty, and somewhat imprisonment mentality at work here.

It's sad when women treat their dogs better than humans, which is what you see a lot of these days...

My apologies for going off tangent as this could be it's own thread.

Yeah, it’s cuz you can basically baby the dog without having to actually care about it as much as a real baby. Women just lost their motherly instincts. Or maybe they never had it to begin with, and society just says they did....

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

The thing about human nature is...even though it's hardwired, it isn't immune to social engineering.

Unfortunately. But that’s only because humans social interactions are engrained within us on a natural level. The only way to corrupt nature is by using something of nature itself.

to be a Marxist, you either have to hate the human race, or else you're just extremely stupid. I've never met a Marxist who wasn't one or the other.

Marxists are retards. And as for the reason why they are misanthropic—it’s because Marxism in general is rooted in atheism. Atheists are much more cyclical and nihilistic than non-atheists. Likely because they don’t believe that there’s justice after we all die.

Anyway, **** those people.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

And, Atheism is a false religion...just a pseudonym for Satanism.

What about "fake christians"?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Same thing.

It's crazy

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Atheism is a false religion...just a pseudonym for Satanism.

It’s devil-worship without realizing it’s devil-worship.