Why do we need that external source of love so badly? Its so crippling. You are depending on another person. A capricious female at that.
Women cant complete you. Kill the thirst
- Thread starter Pandora
- Start date
My friend told me some real stuff once. He said even the most thugged out dude giggles like a school girl when he is pillow talking in bed with his girl. He was your typical urban black dude been to jail etc.
Even the "hardest" guys still desperately seek female unconditional love. If you can break this need then you will be in the top 10% of men mentally.
Even the "hardest" guys still desperately seek female unconditional love. If you can break this need then you will be in the top 10% of men mentally.
Yeh brotha i agree. I think in non western nations that is a reasonable list of expectations...maybe. But you will definitely not find that in modern American women. The juice is not worth the squeeze.
Here is a thought experiment. Is there a society in which men dont want women to provide them with the qualities on that list?
How is the inter gender dynamic in those societies?
Is it an inherent quality of the masculine to seek #1-4? #5 i think is universal. What about tribal warrior cultures. Dagestani culture or native tribes or even nordic viking culture.
Maybe we seek #1-4 because we dont get it anywhere else. Our world is too civilized. Maybe if we had an existential fight we would find meaning in other things than a beautiful woman. Idk bro what do you think?
mrgoodstuff
Master Don Juan
There are some parts of a nan psyche he cannot fill alone. We are not "asexual".
I have never been to war but i used to be fascinated by soldiers. Reading memoirs and books about war survivors you learn alot. These men were in a weird way happy. They had a tribe they could depend on. They felt needed and respected. They knew their place in the world because it was simple. Stay alive and help your brother stay alive.
They pretty much only used women for recreation. Prostitutes behind the safe zone etc. I am not advocating violence and the use of hookers.
I am saying that it may be possible to find true validation in something other than women. But you still need them to fill that procreation and recreation role. Funny enough thats what women are best at. They are best at objectifying themselves and best at being mothers. Thats also when they are happiest. When they are looked at as a sex object but yet also get to fulfill that maternal instinct.
Tyler Durden in Fight Club basically just used that chick for sex and maybe companionship ( kinda).
They pretty much only used women for recreation. Prostitutes behind the safe zone etc. I am not advocating violence and the use of hookers.
I am saying that it may be possible to find true validation in something other than women. But you still need them to fill that procreation and recreation role. Funny enough thats what women are best at. They are best at objectifying themselves and best at being mothers. Thats also when they are happiest. When they are looked at as a sex object but yet also get to fulfill that maternal instinct.
Tyler Durden in Fight Club basically just used that chick for sex and maybe companionship ( kinda).
What parts would you say that is? I agree btw
Lynx nkaf
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,879
- Reaction score
- 1,230
some of the people do identify as that term, lol
mrgoodstuff
Master Don Juan
Some do. But a masculine and sexual male won't be able to imagine or jagg off to add to the parts of his mind that a feminine female can fill for him.
AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
"My most-dearest little Greta. 1000 times and well more think I on you, little sweet angel. God let me one time have that mercy to see you again. Forgive me that I've written to you…” - Georg Christian de Frese, cornet of Västgöta-Dal's cavalry regiment.
”Wish I that God the most-highest wants to preserve my dear miss mother and my most-dearest Sara little from all danger and all harm. She with I remain my most-dearest friend's most faithful man in in death.” - Anders Möller, ensign of Närke-Värmland's infantry regiment.
Letters from swedish soldiers in the Great Northern War (1700-1721), translated literally by me.
I guess these guys were just weak beta cucks though, right. And then the feminists can say their wives or the women they hoped to make their wives were the female equivalents of that.
Lol i agree you can find examples of simp soldiers. But look up Ghenkis Khans view on women and how he treated them. I will find examples later.
AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
I was being sardonic - I meant that those soldiers were good men.
Genghis Khan shouldn't be an inspiration, unless you want to idealize evil.
Hey brotha i agree. I dont like the guy either but he did something right. You dont take over half of euroasia unless you have some proven methods. In every " evil " leader there is some good. For example the guy never tried to convert the religious beliefs of the people he conquered. He let them practice whatever they wanted.
Much of what we know about him could also be false or exaggerated. But i agree i am not the bigges fan. There are other examples i will give later but he is the first that came to mind . Once i get off work i will send them.
Ghenkis khan put the men first. The men ate first and best because they were the warriors. It was the opposite of gynocentrism. So you put men first and the result is conquering the world. When you put women first in a society the result is Soy boys and negative birth rates. Hmmm interesting
Last edited:
AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
"The result is Soy boys"
I agree that women cannot win unless men are winners. If you turn men into losers, women will feel they've lost too because they want men who are winners. They want men who are more assertive and dominant than them, make more money, have more education, are more stoic than them, more experienced than them with more to teach, and of course the physical attributes of being stronger and taller than them. When men don't have more of those things, they start complaining.... as about the "lack of marriageable men".
I couldnt have said it better bro. 100% Truth"The result is Soy boys"
I agree that women cannot win unless men are winners. If you turn men into losers, women will feel they've lost too because they want men who are winners. They want men who are more assertive and dominant than them, make more money, have more education, are more stoic than them, more experienced than them with more to teach, and of course the physical attributes of being stronger and taller than them. When men don't have more of those things, they start complaining.... as about the "lack of marriageable men".
Trying to fill that void with a women is an implicit acknowledgement that she is better than you. This is undeniable. Thirst = she is better. You need her to complete you."The result is Soy boys"
I agree that women cannot win unless men are winners. If you turn men into losers, women will feel they've lost too because they want men who are winners. They want men who are more assertive and dominant than them, make more money, have more education, are more stoic than them, more experienced than them with more to teach, and of course the physical attributes of being stronger and taller than them. When men don't have more of those things, they start complaining.... as about the "lack of marriageable men".
She can sense that on some subconscious level. And as you stated she needs you to be better than her. She needs to chase you to fill her void...not the other way around.
AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
I think there is truth to this.
Humans in general take for granted what they don't have to work for, this goes for both men and women. And since women want men who are mentally stronger than them on top of that, they can be repelled by men who seem to need them too much. In the 3 categories men can fit into (with overlap) - Arousing, Useful, Useless - men who "need" her are Useful because she can control them and they are willing to do things for her, but they are not Arousing because women want men who are in control, not men who can be controlled... especially not by someone like her who is supposed to be weaker than him.
I agree with the OP on alot of what he said.
Last night; I felt and had a nice pair of titties in my mouth. First time I have gotten any action in probably 4.5 nonths.
Did I wake up any happier or accomplished because of it? Nope!
I also think this proves the existence of God. We can indulge in sex, money, drugs, nice cars or any other materialistic thing you can think of. Does it satisfy us? Nope
We are always looking for something deeper and we are hardwired for the divine.
Last night; I felt and had a nice pair of titties in my mouth. First time I have gotten any action in probably 4.5 nonths.
Did I wake up any happier or accomplished because of it? Nope!
I also think this proves the existence of God. We can indulge in sex, money, drugs, nice cars or any other materialistic thing you can think of. Does it satisfy us? Nope
We are always looking for something deeper and we are hardwired for the divine.
metalwater
Master Don Juan
how?
mrgoodstuff
Master Don Juan
Very true on the control bit. They normally cannot be aroused by a man they control. The exception is a superb physical specimen "buck slave". Don't count on this in todays society.
