Its real for him
He's not the only one. It's a lot of folks who party life ends, and then they end up ultra religious.
He would have mocked a woman who had this same life course that he did.
True He would've when he was at the pinnacle of his game... But it's a very normal course. A large percentage of church-goers made the same life course.
He's still a solid resource for learning how to fvck women imo though
Yeah definitely.
I read Bang and Day Bang in the early 2010s. I was coming up on 30 years old when I read those books. I liked Day Bang better because at the time, I had wanted to shift more of my game towards non-bar venues. I've never liked staying up super late to get laid. When I was in undergrad, I would stay up late at college apartment/house parties and bars when I turned 21 to get attention from the women. I didn't do a lot of day game on campus while in undergrad. I wish I had a resource like Day Bang or the London Daygame Model in my arsenal when I was in undergrad. Anyway, Day Bang gave me a foundation for doing day approaches, especially in grocery stores. Day Bang advocates for a more indirect model, which I think has value in certain circumstances. As I got more advanced in approaching, I felt more into direct game. Sometimes, when doing indirect approaching, the women can be confounded and confused by the approach. It doesn't happen much, but it happens enough to be annoying. This can happen with Millennial women, who are more accustomed to fielding app swipe approaches than actual real life approaches. Without Day Bang, I would not have made the shift to mainly daygame as I approached 30. Day game is more sustainable than fighting it out in the bars night after night.
I think you can keep up a lifestyle into your 50s and 60s. That's why you switch more to day game. Day game can easily be done later into life. Around 30, I understood the transience of romantic relationships and realized that I would probably need something more sustainable. I can see situations where a guy could approach women in the grocery store as a 60 year old.
How do/did you deal with it?
Pivoting his own website content and ROK towards the broader societal stuff rather than the narrow focus on PUA/game/seduction is what changed him. He wouldn't have made as many enemies as a PUA/game only person. He did the PUA stuff only from roughly 2004-2013.
IMO, he was kind of gearing that way with aspic-like posts on race. My thoughts are he went to certain countries, got rejected, blamed it on him being Arab/Turkish/Armenian or whatever, and then made it an everyone problem. Not to sound racist myself but most Arab guys I have known have been very "off" when it comes to game and talking to women. The natural swagger you see in a black or white guy is not there. They tend to be petty, competitive for the wrong reasons, and the obsession with blonde women is cringe-worthy as most hot blondes I know would sooner get with an Asian or Indian guy than an Arab.
The "negative" guys that they like would be the type to attack a person or entity that perhaps the female didn't like. Thus making her happy. This same negativity could in the future turn on her, but for the meantime they are making jokes at the same things.
