That’s incorrect.A democracy is a direct vote. A republic is not. Do you not understand?
Definition of republicThat’s incorrect.
Definition of democracy
1a: government by the people especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
Thank you for confirming that a Republic is a democracy!Definition of republic
1a(1): a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president
(2): a political unit (such as a nation) having such a form of government
b(1): a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
(2): a political unit (such as a nation) having such a form of government
~~~
b(1): a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
Sit down, son.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
A democracy in which a few cities cannot rules over everyone else, dumbass.Thank you for confirming that a Republic is a democracy!
I have a related question (bear in mind I'm not following this closely). I heard Pelosi is stalling on sending the articles to the Senate to be voted on, and this thought occurred to me: Could she delay sending the articles indefinitely or is there a time limit? In other words, could she delay sending them until after the elections in the hope that the Dems regain a Senate majority?What happens when Impeachment articles are sent to the Senate?
No.could she delay sending them until after the elections in the hope that the Dems regain a Senate majority?
If they killed any US servicemen, the main question of this thread will be answered faster than you know…Okay well back on topic:
It looks like Iran just retaliated by striking targets in Iraq....
I doubt they did. Official Pentagon report didn’t make mention of it. We knew what they were doing before they did it lol and so we rearranged our troops/equipment/machinery and everything to minimize any possible damage. I think it’s about time we blow these ****ers to kingdom come.If they killed any US servicemen, the main question of this thread will be answered faster than you know…
This is definitely a grey area as nothing like this has ever occurred before. When Clinton was impeached the House sent over the AOI immediately.I have a related question (bear in mind I'm not following this closely). I heard Pelosi is stalling on sending the articles to the Senate to be voted on, and this thought occurred to me: Could she delay sending the articles indefinitely or is there a time limit? In other words, could she delay sending them until after the elections in the hope that the Dems regain a Senate majority?
Certainly unlikely the Dems could pull off that big of a reversal, and I'm not saying this was Pelosi's plan, it was more of a hypothetical question really.Republicans need to hold onto enough seats in the Senate to maintain a wide enough margin to prevent a 67 vote conviction.
Hi Sam,Good to see you around these parts lately...hope the fires aren't a problem for you.
Naw, you just want to follow dear leader into war.Iran has been asking for it. They attacked Saudi Arabia. They attacked oil tankers. They attacked a U.S. Embassy