EyeBRollin
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2015
- Messages
- 10,696
- Reaction score
- 8,640
- Age
- 35
Then why did you mention it?Men don’t make me feel threatened.
Then why did you mention it?Men don’t make me feel threatened.
....this is hypocrisy, you obviously feel threatened by perceived racism which why you cry about it in every discussion yet you attack others as feeling threatened....Conversations don’t make men feel threatened. Don’t get too worked up over there.
False accusations don’t affect innocent parties. If you aren’t a racist, it wouldn’t bother you. Example - If a woman called me fat, or broke, or dumb why the fvck would I care?....this is hypocrisy, you obviously feel threatened by perceived racism which why you cry about it in every discussion yet you attack others as feeling threatened....
Alright Ted Nugent.Lol. Ok. I was entertained for a while. Time for me to turn the mongrel loose.
False accusations are a form of slander, why someone not be bothered by it whether they are guilty or not?False accusations don’t affect innocent parties. If you aren’t a racist, it wouldn’t bother you. Example - If a woman called me fat, or broke, or dumb why the fvck would I care?
Forget the corporate media watch the polls.Are "the walls closing in," Rachel?
Is this the "final bombshell," Don??
Are his "days in the White House numbered," Fredo???
You loony Lefties really are stuck in a rhetorical loop, aren't you? My parents taught me better than to openly mock retards, but I can't help myself. It's just too funny.
The entire leftist media is starting to sound like a 1965 Adam West's TV 'Batman' epilogue. Too bad they're oblivious to their own self-satire, and can't share the laugh with the rest of us.
Polling aggregates are correct. People and politicians lie; numbers don’t.Oh, because the push polls tell the REAL story, eh? SMH
Credibility matters.False accusations are a form of slander, why someone not be bothered by it whether they are guilty or not?
But you throw around accusations of racism as a way to dismiss the arguments of others without actually addressing them. You're in no position to speak on credibility....Credibility matters.
That’s false. You want to revisit this again? Don’t say racist shvt, your argument won’t be labeled racist.But you throw around accusations of racism as a way to dismiss the arguments of others without actually addressing them. You're in no position to speak on credibility....
Quote which of my replies was racist and explain why it's racist.
Iranians, like Americans and like Israeli are not ethnically monolithic yet you view countries as ethno-states and rank their importance by how white you perceive them.Iranians are not Arabs. Their language is Indo-European, they're more related to White Europeans than they are to Arabs whom are Semitic. Arab nations like Saudi Arabia wont have any love loss for Iran.
Straw man argument. No polling aggregate gave Clinton a 98% chance of winning. The one I frequently cite, 538 gave Clinton a 2/3 chance of winning with an estimated 3% popular vote margin."Hillary has a 98% of winning, so all you basement-dwelling welfare babies can go to bed early, tonight, knowing that you'll wake up tomorrow in yet another Hell-scape Bush-Clinton dynasty administration"[to paraphrase every forgotten professional political expert of 2016]
At this point I cant tell if you're being intellectually dishonest or if you really perceive everything as a racially attack...Iranians, like Americans and like Israeli are not ethnically monolithic yet you view countries as ethno-states and rank their importance by how white you perceive them.
And as I said, this conversation requires nuance because Iranians are not ethnically monolithic (as is the case for most countries in the 21st century).At this point I cant tell if you're being intellectually dishonest or if you really perceive everything as a racially attack...
...this is a discussion about how a war in the M.E. would go down....
@Bible_Belt incorrectly assumes that taking out Khomeini would trigger retaliation by Arabs because he incorrectly assumes Iranians are Arabs. I pointed out that that's an incorrect assumption as Iranians are not Arabs and there's no love loss between Arab states and Iran.
Any discussion about conflict in the NE would inevitably require an analysis of religious, political and ethnic demographics, otherwise it would be an inaccurate assessment.
And yet you perceive it as some sort of racial slight intended to attack a group....
And yet when I speak on the nuances of Iran and Arab states you attack me as a racist because I point out that they're nit Arabs and there's historic beefs that have to be taken into consideration when analyzing a conflict in the M.E.And as I said, this conversation requires nuance because Iranians are not ethnically monolithic (as is the case for most countries in the 21st century).