article: 75% of women would have a problem dating a man without a job

[AttackFormation]

Where are you thinking?

I haven't known many Swedish tbh. Most involved was when my mate went out with one in a LDR when he was 16. He went over there a bunch, and she came here with her mates. There were 3, and they all migrated. Think one went to England, one to Ireland, and one to Germany (which is stupid).

My primary choice is probably Australia, specifically probably Brisbane or Adelaide. If that doesn't work, like if I can't find a job in my planned field (regenerative medicine) there or if I would have to live in Melbourne or Sydney to get one and thus be paying in blood for my housing with a 2 hour one way commute, then I will look around for a job in my planned field somewhere in Europe with a mild winter. Even though I might find a job in America for regenerative medicine and they have plenty of fat girls there which is what I want, the country is unfortunately just too much of a shythole for me to consider it even if I did get a good job.

What about you?

 

[AttackFormation]

Australia seems alright imo.

Me? I really do love England. Love it here. Such a wonderful, unique and historical culture to be a part of.

If I moved, it would be like Michael Caine (whom I have a man-crush on). Would be based on escaping 1984 socialist bulls1te, but my thoughts would still be with here. My projection is that this just doesn't happen though. I think this country really does great in the future and I'm very proud of it.

Yea, Australia should be fine. It's unfortunate that their cities are more car-based than Europe's despite what their population actually wants in polls. But in exchange for a great climate, nature and policies that are otherwise quite similar to Europe, I'll take it - and you can both bike and try to live near a public transport line to make up for it, only hiring a car when needed. I dislike cars because sitting in them aches and cramps your body, they're an extra expense too, and when everyone is dependent on them you get congestion anyway as well as air pollution. Part of why I could never live in America.

I'm glad for your sake that you can live with the northern european winters in places like England. Really, I am.

We are on different ends of the political spectrum, but I don't mind that. Brexit will be the start of an interesting period to behold Britain from from afar. I still don't think I'd vote Leave but I can respect someone who does. For me it is more so the unbelievably incompetent manner that Brexit has been handled (assuming it is not a mere theater), the vague promises and especially the falsifiable lies it is promoted with, and the themselves predators and parasites like the Murdoch media and ERG that actually back it and conduct the previous two things, which make me particularly skeptic to it. You're looking to the front, but watch your back.

 

[biggoal]

Are there hot chicks everywhere in Australia? Should I visit there? Are they are screwed up as American girls?

 

[Poonani Maker]

Are there hot chicks everywhere in Australia? Should I visit there? Are they are screwed up as American girls?

Yes, definitely they are. This guy is from Australia, has spent the last few months in Eastern Europe.

 

[user43770]

I like winter, especially this time of year. It's actually hot weather that kills me.



The amount of sabotage has been truly incredible, and it really does show up our parliament as being unable to do it's basic job within a representative democracy.

We do need to watch our backs until the very end. The Labour party have been talking about forcing us to vote on it over again just in the last week - which would be the same sort of thing that happened in France, Holland, Ireland, etc. That would completely destroy any faith anyone has in politics in this country. This has been going on constantly for years now. Really crazy times we are living in.

The powers that be don't want you to leave. They're doing their best to subvert the will of the people.

Same thing happening here, with the left creating ridiculous reasons to impeach Trump.

 

[AttackFormation]

The amount of sabotage has been truly incredible, and it really does show up our parliament as being unable to do it's basic job within a representative democracy.

We do need to watch our backs until the very end. The Labour party have been talking about forcing us to vote on it over again just in the last week - which would be the same sort of thing that happened in France, Holland, Ireland, etc. That would completely destroy any faith anyone has in politics in this country. This has been going on constantly for years now. Really crazy times we are living in.

Well, the referendum was non-binding, and with that in mind these MPs are doing what their job is in it. You may not like what they choose, but in that case what you actually don't like is representative democracy, as the MPs are literally doing what "representative democracy" says on the tin. Wasn't it about "bringing power back to parliament", anyway?

People might have more of an idea of what they are voting for now, if a referendum is conducted again. Leave voters weren't choosing between a deal and no deal the first time, and if they did have a deal in mind, they had no specifics. It has taken so long to "Leave" precisely because of this problem - the EU itself was ready to accept the withdrawal agreement last year.

I think we've been operating under an undemocratic structure for so long (probably like 20 years now?), that they literally don't remember how to be public servants and whom they serve.

Funnily enough, the EU's structure is actually more democratic than the British one when you analyze each of the branches.

 

[user43770]

I think we've been operating under an undemocratic structure for so long (probably like 20 years now?), that they literally don't remember how to be public servants and whom they serve.

Most politicians are bought and paid for. They don't care who they serve, just who signs the checks.

 

[user43770]

Well, the referendum was non-binding, and with that in mind these MPs are doing what their job is in it. You may not like what they choose, but in that case what you actually don't like is representative democracy, as the MPs are literally doing what "representative democracy" says on the tin. Wasn't it about "bringing power back to parliament", anyway?

People might have more of an idea of what they are voting for now, if a referendum is conducted again. Leave voters weren't choosing between a deal and no deal the first time, and if they did have a deal in mind, they had no specifics. It has taken so long to "Leave" precisely because of this problem - the EU itself was ready to accept the withdrawal agreement last year.



Funnily enough, the EU's structure is actually more democratic than the British one when you analyze each of the branches.

From what I understand, the EU wants to keep the UK because of what they bring to the table. Mainly fishing waters.

 

[AttackFormation]

From what I understand, the EU wants to keep the UK because of what they bring to the table. Mainly fishing waters.

It makes sense for an organization to want members, since that's how and why it exists, but the EU is not coercing Britain to stay in - the rules for membership are very clear, and Britain in particular has actually got special favors from the EU that other countries, like France and Germany for example, don't have. Britain would already have left if it weren't for the fact that the Leave side can't agree within themselves whether they want no deal, a deal, and in the latter case what deal they want. The EU already accepted a deal to leave in 2018 that british politicians created, but then the british politicians themselves rejected it. So the EU was like "ok, come back when you've worked out something else" and that's where we still are.

 

[user43770]

It makes sense for an organization to want members, since that's how and why it exists, but the EU is not coercing Britain to stay in -

But they don't need unproductive members like Greece, for example. They need producers like England, to pay for the unproductive members. I think I get it.

 

[AttackFormation]

But they don't need unproductive members like Greece, for example. They need producers like England, to pay for the unproductive members. I think I get it.

The EU transfer payments are a pitter patter game compared to the big picture, or one might say the big problem, which is 'austerity'. Austerity is to economics what mercury used to be to medicine: a "cure" which is really a poison. As long as the EU's member states vote for parties that practice austerity, and the European Central Bank practices it too, Europe is going to become less and less productive anyway.

Each population deserves the government it votes for. Not something you thought a leftist would say, huh?

 

[AttackFormation]

You can make that argument for every election and referendum ever conducted. It is completely absurd and makes a mockery of voting in the first place. (which is sort of the point).

I've only ever encountered this attitude in my lifetime with EU dealings. It's the same exact way that they had people repeatedly vote on the same exact thing in numerous countries. Seems to be a general tactic.

Quite obviously we are not amused by it.

Well, that's what representative democracy is. By the way, I don't even like representative democracy. But that's what the system says on the tin - it's not "malfunctioning" or being "hijacked" in any sense. Those MPs are doing exactly what their job says they do and always have done, haha.

Now you are just having a laugh.

No, it's true - which is what makes it funny. Britain is the country with the least democratic structure in the EU, because of its first past the post system and house of lords. The EU commission is the civil service, and is approved by the EU parliament. The EU parliament is directly elected by each population through proportional representation, where in its place Britain has first past the post. The EU council are the ministers already elected from each country. The EU also lacks an upper house.

I'm not even an EU-enthusiast per se, but that's just what its basic structure is.

 

[biggoal]

I think its the over 35 women who take the career thing more seriously. 24 year olds for example dont seem to make a big deal of it since most are not making much money yet. Older women seem to be focused on financial security more.

 

[sosousage]

What’s the issue here? A lot of people, not just women, prefer to date someone who isn’t broke, imagine not being able to do the things you like to do, with the person you are dating because they can’t afford to do those things or worse, always having to pay for them to do it.
The more a person is considering someone for a LTR/marriage/family the more important that becomes. If a grown person has no job and there’s no valid reason for that (disability, etc) then it’s reasonable to question whether or not investing anything in that person is a good move.

It’s important to have some standards when considering investing in someone else and it sounds like that’s what the article is stating, not one night stands or hook ups but actually dating, which is the first step towards a relationship.

women are goldiggers wh0rez