Indoctrination of the young isn't irrelevant.
Yes. American public schools are is a sorry state, due to political indoctrination, mainly aimed against boys, particularly White boys.
Really, there's nothing taught in 12 years of standard schooling that an intelligent person couldn't master in 6mos of intensive study. It's mostly just a scheme to wharehouse kids, indoctrinate the young and impressionable ones, and keep the older ones out of the job market, for a few extra years.
We don't disagree on the importance of boys being around boys; we just disagree that school is the best or only place for that.
I don't even have a problem with school, per se. What I have a problem with is the extreme feminization of it, and that fathers aren't controlling it. A father should direct the education of his children -- whether directly, through tutors, through instructing a compliant wife, by selecting a suitable private school, of by controlling the curriculum of the local public school. Unfortunately, in America, local public schools are centrally controlled by the federal DOE and UNESCO.
If I had it my way, boys would attend school undistracted by girls. Half the curriculum would by athletics, and participation in combat sports would be mandatory, at all levels. All the teachers would be men.
As it is, keeping my children out of the public school was as much for me as for my kids. I really didn't want to be in constant battle with the school system over their rules, policies, and curriculum, which i already knew where diametrically opposed to my own instructions to my kids, particularly regarding fighting, about which I had always told them if anyone crossed the line with them to knock the other guy squarely on his ass, right then and there. No warnings. No going to the teacher. Public school was never gonna work for my kids(not in its modern incarnation), and the nearest suitable private school was a good drive.
Anyway, between sports and clubs, my kids never had a shortage of peers with whom to associate, and they've always been leaders, and quickly dominated their highschool, when we did finally send them to school. My oldest is a military officer, and his younger brothers seem headed in the same direction.
I can certainly understand why a divorced father, or one without a firm grip on his own household, wouldn't want his kids homeschooled. It isn't something everyone can or should do, especially not single mothers of boys(Norman Bates, anyone?).
Agreed. +1
We've had more than 3 generations of the cuck fest,girl power rubbish, and banished fatherhood. The joker movie comes at a time where incels are a issue. I heard post wall women laughing and having a field day with the goof that went gta and ran people over.The same women would be stoned in other parts of the world.
For a forum that pedals DJ and red pill, there's a lot of guys who suffer low testosterone and are delusional cucks. I saw a thread not long about a guy wanting yo watch his plate get banged out. The joker movie is the portrayal of female psychopathy and evil.
The book Alpha God is another low testosterone male feminist who argues girl power, female victimhood, and man is bad. At no stage does he point out female hypergamy and or female nature's prevalence for violent men (not less). Its cyclical.
There's a abundance of examples of female psychopathy. Cassey Anthony and karla homolka. One murders her daughter. The other murdersand rapes her sister along with her husband among other women. Her husband is rotting in jail as he should yet, she's free and was caught around school children. The series of rapey school teachers were women. She is a victim. Man is bad.
The origin story of the Joker in DC comics is shrouded in mystery. It is not hard to do the math. Look around at the **** hole society, at divorce rape, at cucking, and the series of behaviour in female nature that would have been weeded out of the gene pool in many parts of the world via stoning.
Even more alarming than the following is the pieces of **** that will defend female psychopathy here in the forums or irl. The daring to discuss or even call out female psychopathy is met with misogyny, bitter or some other rhetoric from a male feminist with really low testosterone and a inability to compete.
We're (in general, as a whole) simply not having the discussion. I blame low testosterone. The few who have the balls to make the call out are the outliers.
The joker and the lost Boys era is a by product of feminism, single moms,affirmative action, quota hirings, indoctrination in a education system that's anti male, slinging drugs adhd meds onto boys for not being a girl, brought up by womenwho are hard leftist, feminist, likely divorced and on the cawk carousel . The go to argument is man is bad and demonise masculinity. Promo for girl power. Mitigate declining SMV in women anti slut shame, proud single moms promo,pparade of free money to women and the extraction of male resources.
We are then surprised when the incel goes gta on the world in a mini van? Amber alert on a father who is divorce raped? Custody kidnapped.
There's no ambiguity. Lines are drawn. Either with you a man or against. There's no exception. The discussion must be had. Any and every cowardice cuck who fires off is against you as is any woman who holds ambiguity. Any time you speak your truth or don't, it's simping.
Men do. Any hesitation is cowardice. You see it in failed approaching. Not rejection. In the beta not approaching but has a theory on getting girls despite never seen a vagina before.
