Talking about escorts or prostitution seems to get you all excited in any thread that touches this topic.
I wonder why..
Anyways, ur perception on them is in no way reflective on how I think.
You use emotions when dealing with them as if to fill a void in ur soul.
You mean when I dealt with them, past tense, on Dec 4 & Dec 5, 2014. By the way, buying prostitution became illegal on midnight of December 6, 2014 if you review Canadian law. I dealt with them a hair before the law of the land made the principle of buying sex in Canada illegal as a last minute purchase.
That was a rational decision based on a law passed by the then conservative government. Had that law not been passed, Bill C-36, and had I still been inside a marriage, then I would not have visited those two prostitutes.
Therefore, you are making a presumption that I made an emotional decision. Why would I want to take an additional legal risk after midnight Dec 6, 2014 or afterwards and not just get this out of my system one time?
Spaz said:
I use rationality, profitability, sound judgement and basically all round good sense.
That means if you were placed in my position and wanted to experiment with this for curiosity knowing that A LAW WAS CHANGING AFTER MIDNIGHT, that you would not want to incur additional legal risk once the law changed and to get it over with before that time.
Spaz said:
I don't view them with disgust nor disdain. I said cheap because it's useless to bring those types with me, there's no profit to be had.
You said a $ 300 escort is not a real escort but a dirty skank. That sounds like a judgment to me.
Spaz said:
When I say dirty, it means they're high mileage and that means a higher probability of being infected with some disease. That's rationality playing out and an advice to men here to be careful.
I don't know how you can say that without it sounding like you are calling them diseased ridden garbage. I mean you can dress your words up, polish things up, make it sound like you are not making a judgment, but you could only do so much before even that sort of falls apart.
If you were honest with your wording rather presenting a mild version, you would say "it means they've slept with an industrial-level tonne of guys and probably have every STD you can think of on the planet and you are friggin INSANE AND STUPID if you dare deal with one".... that's paraphrasing what you said. I said the same exact thing you said but it conveys a different tone which I feel is the true meaning of what you are saying, but refuse to admit it. I say that's not honest.
Also, are you even realistically telling men to be careful? You sound like, unless they are part of high society and can afford ultra-expensive escorts that you are basically insane to deal with them. Who here is going to pay $ 1000 + PER HOUR for an escort? If $ 300 escorts are dirty then they are all dirty and it's not an option for the average guy here.
Spaz said:
You on the other hand are not thinking but expressing the deep seated emotions about past experiences with prostitution or women which chains ur soul and feels conflicted by it.
Ur conflict is ur problem not mine nor is it my fault.
You've never been with an escort so you don't really have a right to post on this thread. If you've been with an escort and had a great experience, or if you have a bad experience is better than not dealing with one and saying yeah or neh.