So my small research into the "wage gap" shows two things - first is that there is a meaningful effect between hours worked, and professions pursued. In the case of the first and second, men elect to work longer hours and/or pursue technical fields that pay more. When the numbers are run between men/women for hours/field, the different is not statistically significant.
I see a lot of talk about trying to get women into STEM fields, and why men allegedly try to bully women out of these fields. Having worked in engineering, and software, I can say that this is simply not the case in my experience. What is never discussed in these news clips is that men are simply inclined to do these fields for free, and women focus on the money. Now this isn't a cold hard fast rule, but I can list half a dozen men including myself who have developed software and made the switch, or engineering projects on their own time and know 0 women who have done this. Think of two examples - one being myself and dedicating my free time to developing, and someone I know who complains about how unequal it is for men but not electing to do anything about it. If she decided to teach herself something in a high demand field, i have no doubt she could land a job the same as me.
I guess for women to earn more than men in a meaningful way, they will have to work longer hours in professions that pay more. Now I know plenty of women that bust their asses working several jobs, so its certainly not a question of work ethic. Next would have to be a secular decline in the need, and subsequent remuneration for high paying fields like tech. I suppose this is possible, but given the trends in tech as a whole, I simply dont see if happening in the long term.
On a personal note, I have zero problem dating a women who earns more than me. **** it, I'd enjoy it. it'd be my preference.