Terminated From Match.com for Asking Women Their Age

[Masculinity]

The title says it all. I ran an experiment and sent messages to several women inquiring if they were over a certain age, for instance, if they were 26 I'd ask if they were over 30. The responses were pouring in, as were the views to my page and messages. I had more activity in a span of 2 hours than the whole week I had been on the site until that point, got a few numbers from the experiment as well.

But everything good comes to an end, haha. Some women took it well and some were "offended" that I inquired about their age and even became verbally aggressive. Some even told me I needed to compliment them (yes, I got this verbatim). Long story short, I got an email from Match.com today saying my account has been terminated (no reason stated) and no refunds will be made (paid about $60).

We live in an enormous blue pill society that demonizes men and pedestalizes women. The worst part is that the approach actually worked! But no, they want you to be chivalrous and bend over backwards for women, which we know gets us only to the friend zone. They site wants the blue pill bullsh*t of "impressing her" and "hiring a pro to set your profile for you" and shower HB6's & 7s with compliments.

Another reason to do cold-approaches! Don't waste your time on OLD. There isn't a difference between paid and free OLD sites. Women assume you're an AFC as the default. Screw the blue-pill mentality.

 

[logicallefty]

Your post has me speechless. So according to Snatch I mean Match we don’t have a right to know the age of the women we are dating now?

Compliment the women on what??? What have these women done to EARN my compliment?? Yes I said earn. They need to DO something first.... I guess I could say “Wow hun you must be great at multitasking to be able to have 5 kids with 5 dads” or “Your so independent to be able to live with your parents like that ” or “You make a perfect duck face do you like to duck hunt?”

It just gets more insane by the day

 

[skinnyguy]

Your post has me speechless. So according to Snatch I mean Match we don’t have a right to know the age of the women we are dating now?

Compliment the women on what??? What have these women done to EARN my compliment?? Yes I said earn. They need to DO something first.... I guess I could say “Wow hun you must be great at multitasking to be able to have 5 kids with 5 dads” or “Your so independent to be able to live with your parents like that ” or “You make a perfect duck face do you like to duck hunt?”

It just gets more insane by the day

Lol 5 kids with 5 dads

 

[marmel75]

I would demand a refund or threaten with a lawsuit on principal

 

[guru1000]

So you are asking 26 yos if they are over 30, thus insulting them and wondering why you got booted.

LOL

 

[Masculinity]

I would demand a refund or threaten with a lawsuit on principal

Yes, I'm going to call them tomorrow. We'll see how it goes.

So you are asking 26 yos if they are over 30, thus insulting them and wondering why you got booted.

LOL

You're not getting it.

I'm not wondering why my account was closed; the answer is obvious. The point is that if simply asking questions online got me terminated, what would have happened if I had attended one of Match's in-person events and kino'd a girl who decides I was harassing or assaulting her sexually? I've been red-pill for over 10 years and have not had any issues with women--mostly happy lays and LTR's in fact. I'd say my escalation is well-calibrated.

The point is that men are assumed to be the predators--the bad guys without regard to any form of evidence. We are guilty until proven innocent when a "damsel in distress" is involved or when we question women. I'm not going to apologize for being male; we shouldn't live in an overly-sensitive society that demonizes and/or criminalizes men for reaching out to women (all else being equal).

 

[MrWood]

The point is that men are assumed to be the predators--the bad guys without regard to any form of evidence.

this is what is fvcked up.

I travel the world in my work and live in Finland (born and raised in California, Hawaii, Washington for 42 years)
... this attitude above is only present in North America (and a little in the UK).

funny that.

 

[ohrein]

Yes, I'm going to call them tomorrow. We'll see how it goes.





You're not getting it.

I'm not wondering why my account was closed; the answer is obvious. The point is that if simply asking questions online got me terminated, what would have happened if I had attended one of Match's in-person events and kino'd a girl who decides I was harassing or assaulting her sexually? I've been red-pill for over 10 years and have not had any issues with women--mostly happy lays and LTR's in fact. I'd say my escalation is well-calibrated.

The point is that men are assumed to be the predators--the bad guys without regard to any form of evidence. We are guilty until proven innocent when a "damsel in distress" is involved or when we question women. I'm not going to apologize for being male; we shouldn't live in an overly-sensitive society that demonizes and/or criminalizes men for reaching out to women (all else being equal).

The thread was funny up until here. It's true, we need to be careful out there.

 

[El Payaso]

It's all your fault. You have no one but yourself to blame. How dare you ask a woman her age. Don't you know only women get such privileges like asking you your height or what you do for a living. The nerve of you to even think of asking such a sexually depraved question.

 

[Spaz]

It's all your fault. You have no one but yourself to blame. How dare you ask a woman her age. Don't you know only women get such privileges like asking you your height or what you do for a living. The nerve of you to even think of asking such a sexually depraved question.

Hahaha...

 

[Spaz]

@Masculinity , nice experiment.

Another bloody good reason in my book not to go OLD.

 

[guru1000]

Yes, I'm going to call them tomorrow. We'll see how it goes.





You're not getting it.

I'm not wondering why my account was closed; the answer is obvious. The point is that if simply asking questions online got me terminated, what would have happened if I had attended one of Match's in-person events and kino'd a girl who decides I was harassing or assaulting her sexually? I've been red-pill for over 10 years and have not had any issues with women--mostly happy lays and LTR's in fact. I'd say my escalation is well-calibrated.

The point is that men are assumed to be the predators--the bad guys without regard to any form of evidence. We are guilty until proven innocent when a "damsel in distress" is involved or when we question women. I'm not going to apologize for being male; we shouldn't live in an overly-sensitive society that demonizes and/or criminalizes men for reaching out to women (all else being equal).

It’s common sense.

Match is a business. When customers of a business complain, in order for a business to maintain its profitability, the business must take the action which best serves its clients and maintains their memberships.

The evidence are your messages in THEIR website, which can be submitted as evidence in litigation if you ever went that route. Further, in their rules of membership, they maintain the right to cancel one’s membership for any reason they deem fit. A loss of potential revenue is a damn good reason. If a member is insulting women, and as a proximate result many women might cancel their memberships, the owner of a business has every legal and equitable right to ban the member. Not a sexist act. It’s called being smart.

When you enter any arena, know the rules, and play the arena’s “game” the best. Don’t whine and play the victim card under someone’s else roof. Just play the game better the next time. And if you dont like their arena, then create your own arena and YOU make the rules.

Though, they could have issued you a warning before the ban. I can only presume many complaints came in at once which prompted the ban.

 

[Spaz]

It’s common sense.

Match is a business. When customers of a business complain, in order for a business to maintain its profitability, the business must take the action which best serves its clients and maintains their memberships.

The evidence are your messages in THEIR website, which can be submitted as evidence in litigation if you ever went that route. Further, in their rules of membership, they maintain the right to cancel one’s membership for any reason they deem fit. A loss of potential revenue is a damn good reason. If a member is insulting women, and as a proximate result many women might cancel their memberships, the owner of a business has every legal and equitable right to ban the member. Not a sexist act. It’s called being smart.

When you enter any arena, know the rules, and play the arena’s “game” the best. Don’t whine and play the victim card under someone’s else roof. Just play the game better the next time. And if you dont like their arena, then create your own arena and YOU make the rules.

Though, they could have issued you a warning before the ban. I can only presume many complaints came in at once which prompted the ban.

This is good.

Great news for men.

Then all that's left on OLD sites will be 95% White Knights, 2% wannabe PUA, 1% deranged men and 2% who knows how to game.

The 95% can validate and orbit all those needy women whole day long whilst others get to impregnate a few and leave a good white knight to raise their offspring.

I think this is fair.

 

[guru1000]

This is good.

Great news for men.

Then all that's left on OLD sites will be 95% White Knights, 2% wannabe PUA, 1% deranged men and 2% who knows how to game.

The 95% can validate and orbit all those needy women whole day long whilst others get to impregnate a few and leave a good white knight to raise their offspring.

I think this is fair.

IRL with women, the Pareto principle (80/20) applies. In OLD, it's more like 95/5 or 90/10. Survival of the strongest. I delineated ways for ANY man here to be in the top 10%. If so man chooses, he can be it, if he applies the concepts I put forward.

As to the OP, it behooves a man to fully understand social nuances. In Match, a woman's age is clearly posted. A man should know that all women want to look younger not older.

If you ask a 26 yo who posted her age as 26, if she is older than 30 based on the observation of her pics, you are insulting her.

If you ask a 26 yo who posted her age as 26, if she is 21 based on the observation of her pics, you are complimenting her.

This should be common sense.

 

[RangerMIke]

It’s common sense.
Match is a business. When customers of a business complain, in order for a business to maintain its profitability, the business must take the action which best serves its clients and maintains their memberships.

Yep... it's a business model that allows chicks to get validation without any effort. If they were in the real world, well.... they would have to practice Yoga every day, eat well, and look good to get validation. With Match... well she can sit in her wine stained, cat hair covered bathrobe eating Cadbury eggs and get all the positive attention she wants.

She's online to get her ego stroked... and you are a buzz kill. This would be akin to a guy sitting in a restaurant pretending to be swatting at flies.... I'm pretty sure the restaurant manager would ask that person to leave as well.

 

[guru1000]

Yep... it's a business model that allows chicks to get validation without any effort. If they were in the real world, well.... they would have to practice Yoga every day, eat well, and look good to get validation. With Match... well she can sit in her wine stained, cat hair covered bathrobe eating Cadbury eggs and get all the positive attention she wants.

She's online to get her ego stroked... and you are a buzz kill. This would be akin to a guy sitting in a restaurant pretending to be swatting at flies.... I'm pretty sure the restaurant manager would ask that person to leave as well.

Yep. But, look at the reverse scenario. Fat chicks might get banged by a few desperados and then tossed. Does she really win?

Hot chicks get inundated by most men when they are young, and then set aside when she hits the wall, while men age like fine wine and continue to hit young, hot azz in their 40s and 50s.

At the end, it's a zero sum game.

Losers whine.

Men, don't wish the game were easier. Instead, get better.

 

[sosousage]

i used to get tinder bans for ****y n funny openers.

for them its just money. you cant offend females because if there wont be females then horny men wont buy premium

 

[Bible_Belt]

I ran an experiment and sent messages to several women inquiring if they were over a certain age, for instance, if they were 26 I'd ask if they were over 30.

You could also make a female profile and send a first message to guys that accuses them of lying about their income or their height, and see how they react. I would be offended, I know that. Maybe most men would not, but I still don't see how you can start with negativity and expect anything positive to come out of it.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Yes, I'm going to call them tomorrow. We'll see how it goes.





You're not getting it.

I'm not wondering why my account was closed; the answer is obvious. The point is that if simply asking questions online got me terminated, what would have happened if I had attended one of Match's in-person events and kino'd a girl who decides I was harassing or assaulting her sexually? I've been red-pill for over 10 years and have not had any issues with women--mostly happy lays and LTR's in fact. I'd say my escalation is well-calibrated.

The point is that men are assumed to be the predators--the bad guys without regard to any form of evidence. We are guilty until proven innocent when a "damsel in distress" is involved or when we question women. I'm not going to apologize for being male; we shouldn't live in an overly-sensitive society that demonizes and/or criminalizes men for reaching out to women (all else being equal).

Our guy sounds like he was fully aware. He was calling them out on several years old pics and taking them off their high horse in a slight way. They didn't have to be offended, they could've humbly corrected him. He encountered ego.

 

[wifehunter]

Compliment the women on what???

That's easy...compliment them on their huge cheezburger ass!