Good article by Aaron Sleazy. Do YOU approach sluts differently than quality women knowing that one woman is a known slvt (or highly suspected to be) and the other isn't? And should we as men just "accept" slvts as possible future LTR's let alone marriage material because "the past is the past and she's changed for you her alpha" or is that reserved for the type of males whom can't get any better and need to delude themselves that the town's mattress morphs into a "sally homemaker / wifey material" because she's with them now?
We are told that “slvt shaming” is a vile act and something basement-dwelling losers do who need an outlet for their pent-up sexual frustrations. Yet, that claim is so wrong it’s not even funny. Instead, slvt-shaming plays a very important role in keeping society stable and weeding worthless women out of the dating pool. I’ll explain why.
Let’s discuss this issue via an example. Assume Alice is in a relationship with Bob. They live in a small town in which there is not a lot of randomly hooking up going on. Because Alice is a strong and independent woman, she goes on a vacation with all her strong and independent girlfriends and ends up getting banged in a dirty bathroom stall. She thinks nothing about it because “what’s in the past is in the past”, or something along those lines. Unfortunately, for her, Bob learns about Alice’s transgression. He kicks her out. Furthermore, he lets his entire extended social circle know that Alice is a slvt.
Alice isn’t happy about this. News about her being a slvt spreads. The quality guys she comes across don’t seem to be very much inclined in taking her out on a date, but they sure are willing to buy her a drink or two, trying to bang her quickly and cheaply. It seems she can’t get anywhere in terms of sexual relationships in her town anymore. The only guys who are interested in her are those looking for a quick lay. Consequently, Alice gets very angry with the world, cursing “patriarchy” and condemning the systematic bullying she went through. Her only option may be to leave town and start over somewhere new.
If this sounds far-fetched to you, then go through a few women you know. Are there any among them who have a reputation for being easy? If so, how do you approach these, as opposed to women who are known for keeping their legs together? More likely, if you only wanted to get laid, you’d avoid the latter and focus on the former. If you are looking for a girlfriend, your priorities would be reversed.
Of course, you could now say that slvt shaming is vile and evil. Yet, it serves an important purpose. In the example above, Alice has, by her own actions, proved that she is an untrustworthy partner. She also proved that any man who would invest resources in her is an idiot. Thus, for the greater good of society, women like her need to be slvt-shamed. In the end, it is a matter of efficient resource allocation in society. Guys who want to get laid know who the slvts are, and guys who want a girlfriend know whom to avoid.
The whiny feminist response to this is that Alice is strong and independent and shouldn’t be punished just because she cheated on her boyfriend. That does not make a lot of sense, though. Actions have consequences. One of the favorite lines of cucks and sluts alike is, “what’s in the past is in the past”. I think there is a much more fitting phrase: “once a slut, always a slvt.” If we, as a society, did not slut-shame loose women, men would be even less willing to commit and share their resources.
We are told that “slvt shaming” is a vile act and something basement-dwelling losers do who need an outlet for their pent-up sexual frustrations. Yet, that claim is so wrong it’s not even funny. Instead, slvt-shaming plays a very important role in keeping society stable and weeding worthless women out of the dating pool. I’ll explain why.
Let’s discuss this issue via an example. Assume Alice is in a relationship with Bob. They live in a small town in which there is not a lot of randomly hooking up going on. Because Alice is a strong and independent woman, she goes on a vacation with all her strong and independent girlfriends and ends up getting banged in a dirty bathroom stall. She thinks nothing about it because “what’s in the past is in the past”, or something along those lines. Unfortunately, for her, Bob learns about Alice’s transgression. He kicks her out. Furthermore, he lets his entire extended social circle know that Alice is a slvt.
Alice isn’t happy about this. News about her being a slvt spreads. The quality guys she comes across don’t seem to be very much inclined in taking her out on a date, but they sure are willing to buy her a drink or two, trying to bang her quickly and cheaply. It seems she can’t get anywhere in terms of sexual relationships in her town anymore. The only guys who are interested in her are those looking for a quick lay. Consequently, Alice gets very angry with the world, cursing “patriarchy” and condemning the systematic bullying she went through. Her only option may be to leave town and start over somewhere new.
If this sounds far-fetched to you, then go through a few women you know. Are there any among them who have a reputation for being easy? If so, how do you approach these, as opposed to women who are known for keeping their legs together? More likely, if you only wanted to get laid, you’d avoid the latter and focus on the former. If you are looking for a girlfriend, your priorities would be reversed.
Of course, you could now say that slvt shaming is vile and evil. Yet, it serves an important purpose. In the example above, Alice has, by her own actions, proved that she is an untrustworthy partner. She also proved that any man who would invest resources in her is an idiot. Thus, for the greater good of society, women like her need to be slvt-shamed. In the end, it is a matter of efficient resource allocation in society. Guys who want to get laid know who the slvts are, and guys who want a girlfriend know whom to avoid.
The whiny feminist response to this is that Alice is strong and independent and shouldn’t be punished just because she cheated on her boyfriend. That does not make a lot of sense, though. Actions have consequences. One of the favorite lines of cucks and sluts alike is, “what’s in the past is in the past”. I think there is a much more fitting phrase: “once a slut, always a slvt.” If we, as a society, did not slut-shame loose women, men would be even less willing to commit and share their resources.
