guru1000
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,362
- Reaction score
- 4,403
Tenacity ready for another 10-page thread?
One should always fully protect themselves and their assets parked in sophisticated instruments, and assume the worst.
2) I have an asset-protection structure that cannot be pierced by the courts, as it involves trust bylaws which automatically relinquish its assets to an offshore trustee under moments of "duress" (which would be specifically defined as at the moment a legal action were brought against you) so even if (1) a Prenup were pierced; (2) the Legal Entity were pierced; and (3) A judge ordered you to surrender assets; you couldn't surrender such assets as no longer own them!
The chances of a strong prenup being set aside is extremely low, but possible.
The chances of a legal entity being set aside is extremely low, but possible.
The chances of your surrendering assets you no longer own is 0%.
You state you have dated over 200+ women over six years, correct? Out of those 200+ women, how many would you have deemed "unicorns," meaning "quality" women who would have actually enhanced your life?
1) If you truly understand the U.S. legal system, then you understand that you are never truly protected in anything venture that you undertake. Buy a piece of R/E, for example, and you are already subject to liability by tenants, regulatory entities, random strangers walking on the sidewalk during inclement weather conditions, judgments from outside creditors, inter alia.Tenacity said:You know there's something wrong with an arrangement when you have to go through all sorts of incorporations, transfers, secret accounts, and asset protection schemes in order to protect yourself. Ask yourself this question, if you have to do ALL OF THAT, why even do it in the first place?
One should always fully protect themselves and their assets parked in sophisticated instruments, and assume the worst.
2) I have an asset-protection structure that cannot be pierced by the courts, as it involves trust bylaws which automatically relinquish its assets to an offshore trustee under moments of "duress" (which would be specifically defined as at the moment a legal action were brought against you) so even if (1) a Prenup were pierced; (2) the Legal Entity were pierced; and (3) A judge ordered you to surrender assets; you couldn't surrender such assets as no longer own them!
The chances of a strong prenup being set aside is extremely low, but possible.
The chances of a legal entity being set aside is extremely low, but possible.
The chances of your surrendering assets you no longer own is 0%.
Now the next question becomes why even be subject to such a potentiality. This is where the 10 pages will begin. But before I answer this, I'd like to know one thing from you:Tenacity said:But why?
You state you have dated over 200+ women over six years, correct? Out of those 200+ women, how many would you have deemed "unicorns," meaning "quality" women who would have actually enhanced your life?