Why was Reykhel banned?

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Now I’m the last person I thought would be making a thread for someone getting banned, but I actually was really fond of the guy. He looked at things from a different angle than most most people do and I thought it was very valuable. I can’t seem to find anything really ban-worthy in his recent posts though so I’m wondering what the reason was.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Insults and name calling, publicly and privately. It's almost always that one reason that gets people banned. His ban is temporary.

 

[guru1000]

Reykhel is my man. Look forward to his return.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Insults and name calling, publicly and privately. It's almost always that one reason that gets people banned. His ban is temporary.

Thanks.

 

[Solomon]

Rehekyl is bad yet there is a guy in the mature men's forum using racial epithets smh

Why has that member not got a warning?

smh let me throw the "C" word around I bet you guys would be have banned faster than bigneil at stripclub

 

[Atom Smasher]

Rehekyl is bad yet there is a guy in the mature men's forum using racial epithets smh

Why has that member not got a warning?

smh let me throw the "C" word around I bet you guys would be have banned faster than bigneil at stripclub

1) Who are you referring to? PM me the name please.
2) How do you know he hasn't received warnings and that we're not actively dealing with him?
3) You can use the C word all you want. What gets guys in trouble are direct, personal attacks, such as "[NAME], you are a stupid "C".

Name-calling is not tolerated here. Most guys (easily 99%) have no issue with that and never get warned about it, as they understand that name-calling is the default behavior of a kindergartner, not of a grown man.

 

[ubercat]

Hope the old reykel returns. The one who is into workouts philosophy rhetoric martial arts and enjoying the best of Eastern and western culture. He was a renaissance man.

The new drugged up and reactive Reykel. Nothing special about that guy.

 

[Julian]

Name callings not tolerated on these forums. But what is tolerated is:

- women bashing an hating (@RichardTheFrog/@Tenacity)
- racism (bigneil)
- prostitution talk (bigneil/richard/
- trolling (too many to name)
- lieing (also too many)
- alt accounts (goodgao/listen2olly, etc)
- creating same threads constantly just worded different


But calling someone whos blatantly trolling or spreading negativity like its syphillis..is a no no. I feel the mods do a good job for the most part but theres def Some decisions i dont grasp. Or lackthereof.

 

[Atom Smasher]

@Julian Here's something I don't quite grasp... As long as you're publicly calling out the mods, I see that you're sitting on 500 warning points as I type this, yet we have been very lenient with you and have avoided banning you. Did we make a mistake in our leniency when it comes to you personally?

 

[Tenacity]

@Julian Here's something I don't quite grasp... As long as you're publicly calling out the mods, I see that you're sitting on 500 warning points as I type this, yet we have been very lenient with you and have avoided banning you. Did we make a mistake in our leniency when it comes to you personally?

Atom here's the thing. As you know I was just removed off my "temp ban" and I was sent an explanation by @Espi that my ban was due to the rant thread I created about....quote, unquote...."beating and stomping the fvck out of a bytch". Another explanation was me telling @Von to....quote, unquote...."put me on your pvssy a.ss Ignore List" after the guy continued to threaten me about putting me on it.

Now here's the thing, I totally understand talking about stomping a bytch isn't cool, but there was NO GIRL specifically referenced in that thread. It was a rant thread. Furthermore, telling @Von to keep me on his "pvssy a.ss ignore list" doesn't seem to be anything extreme, because as GROWN MEN, we shouldn't keep running around telling other GROWN MEN we are going to "put them on Ignore" and don't do it. It was literally the 5th time the guy said it and I'm STILL not on Ignore yet.

So here's my thing.....I am of the opinion that none of these recent bans have anything to do with any violation of the rules. It appears to me that there's a movement here to wash out the Red Pill/Market Is Bad/Truth Commentators on this website like myself, @da dynamically, @Poon King, @bigneil , and now @Reykhel .......in favor of keeping people here who contribute NOTHING to this website in terms of truth telling, such as people like @sazc or keeping people here who are only focused on keeping up an Internet Personality like @guru1000 .

Now my question is this......what in the world is going on here? I believe you Atom are leading the pack with this new movement and coming up with the lamest excuses in the world for why all of these "bans" are happening. But people like myself and others are not stupid Atom, we can see clearly what this is all about......you are trying to wash the Red Pill guys off the website.

 

[Atom Smasher]

More nonsense. You were banned for a multitude of rants. That is your way.

I occasionally mention why a person was banned so that guys will know that pretty much the only thing that gets a long-standing member banned is directly attacking other members in a sustained way and after several warnings.

I can tell you that I'm sure as heck not going to justify my activities to you. You, my friend, are utterly blind as to why you were actually banned.

I will say that several people you mentioned in your list are friends of mine, and we are in contact several times a week on a personal level. These guys know they were banned for being a bit of a d!ck, they fully admit that, and tell me that they get why they were banned. I generally tell them to come on back when they're ready, that we want them here. They sure as heck don't need you to advocate for them. They have made the connection between their own behavior and the results. Not every one you have mentioned, but I will say most of them have.

If you spent more time working on balancing yourself instead of coming up with wildly speculative conspiracy theories, you would be less inclined to tantrum throwing.

I'm not going to engage in a p!ssing match with you. You've had your say and I've had mine. The conversation ends here. If you'd like to continue via PM, hit me up there.

 

[logicallefty]

What I have seen happen several times (at least three) is this: An outstanding member is rolling along fine. Then as soon as their popularity on the forum reaches a certain point, they think that gives them a free ticket to start disrespecting the rules and being a c0ck to other people... Aaaaaand then they end up banned after multiple warnings.. Then people go "This is a conspiracy against red pill posters", "You banned them because they were getting too many likes", etc...

 

[sazc]

@Tenacity you can quit trying to goad me into engaging you. You seek constant validation via interaction. When you don't feel you are getting enough attention, you start drama. Arguing, conspiracy theories, etc. All immature nonsense IMO

Moving forward you and I will cease to have interaction by my decision. Tag and goad me all you want, you will be wasting your time.

Good Luck

 

[sosousage]

Rehekyl is bad yet there is a guy in the mature men's forum using racial epithets smh

Why has that member not got a warning?

smh let me throw the "C" word around I bet you guys would be have banned faster than bigneil at stripclub

why not write his name?

guys just be more IDGAF type..

 

[Tenacity]

I occasionally mention why a person was banned so that guys will know that pretty much the only thing that gets a long-standing member banned is directly attacking other members in a sustained way and after several warnings.

More nonsense. You were banned for a multitude of rants. That is your way.

So on one hand, you said guys are banned for directly attacking other members.........then you state, I was banned for ranting on women that aren't members of this forum and nobody on this forum even knows?

I would love to know the "Sosuave Member(s)" that I attacked? Was it @Von for telling him to keep me on his Ignore List that he continued to threaten me over? Maybe it was @sazc who would SPAM my PM box daily about why certain members needed to be banned, yet, she herself have contributed NOTHING to this forum? Maybe it was @guru1000 who spends his time sending various RACIST comments to me and talks about how if Tenacity isn't banned, he's going to sue the forum?

If you spent more time working on balancing yourself instead of coming up with wildly speculative conspiracy theories, you would be less inclined to tantrum throwing.

I am balanced. I make a RANT THREAD about women you and nobody else on this forum have ever seen before, and you use that as a lame excuse for a ban? Where were these "warnings" that supposedly go out before a ban? I received no such warning.

The only PM I received from you was weeks prior that simply asked why I was so HARD on the Moderating Team. That's it. Because let's call a spade a spade here, I was BANNED for telling the truth about this Moderating Team. It ticked you off and you got your group together to kick me off.

I'm not going to engage in a p!ssing match with you. You've had your say and I've had mine. The conversation ends here. If you'd like to continue via PM, hit me up there.

Yeah and in PM you will continue with more non-sense and use my responses in PM as justification for a ban. That's why you want to take the conversation to PM, it's so you can do a PERM Ban and come back to the forum and "lie" about how "crazy" Tenacity acted in the PM.

And whether or not those forum members who were banned are "friends"of yours or not (not sure what the term friends means in this context, do you guys know each other personally offline?)......there is still a strange situation where Red Pill/Truth Commentators are being kicked off this website one by one.

 

[Tenacity]

@Tenacity you can quit trying to goad me into engaging you. You seek constant validation via interaction. When you don't feel you are getting enough attention, you start drama. Arguing, conspiracy theories, etc. All immature nonsense IMO

Moving forward you and I will cease to have interaction by my decision. Tag and goad me all you want, you will be wasting your time.

Good Luck

There's an Ignore button.....have you ever heard of it? If you feel this passionate about hating Tenacity, you can forever eliminate his commentary. Oh but I forgot....you don't want to do that, you want Tenacity's commentary to be completely shut off so you refuse to Ignore Me and will just keep sending the Moderators like @Atom Smasher (the guy in your back pocket) SPAM PMs everyday until he bans me like before.

Like I said, folks can easily go to your profile and see you are FOLLOWING/FRIENDS with just about every major Moderator that posts often on the forum: http://www.sosuave.net/forum/members/sazc.134154/

 

[guru1000]

I am balanced.

LOL

 

[Von]

Time to ban all the MOD to have SoSuave self regulate itself.

Surprised that guy got banned, hé was quite good for insight

However, there was soo many great posters who after à while just back flamers and trolls.. réal bêta at then end

Atleast the ignore button work wonders for the consistant trolls

Quality been improving here lately, since somes bans (that took long for some)

When you ban someone those his content dissapear?

 

[Atom Smasher]

No, the content usually remains unless the person was advocating psychotic or illegal behavior.

 

[sosousage]

No, the content usually remains unless the person was advocating psychotic or illegal behavior.

There was a thread that was promoting bullying lol