I Propose a boycott

[ChristopherColumbus]

A 50 year old guy should not be interested in a 20 year old girl. If he is, there must have been something of an arrested development somewhere along the line.

 

[Urbanyst]

You are very emotional. And this is a very MGTOW (fyi not red pill) worldview.

LOL. So having standards is considered MGTOW now?

Men are in deep sh*t if this is the thinking of today...

 

[TheMonkeyKing]

LOL. So having standards is considered MGTOW now?

Men are in deep sh*t if this is the thinking of today...

Haa. Typical MGTOW-feminist think speak. Twisting people's words against them to suit their own narrative, especially when they can't come up with a counter argument of their own. Again just more emotive nonsensical splutters and crying. Woohoo, 'deep sh!!!!t'. Haa. You do make me laugh, you lot.

You think your list demonstrates applying values, a few superficial 'standards' that you borrow / have been told by some other MGTOW incel keyboard jockey.

This is the internet dude. If your view of women is so overly pessimistic that you go on some pathetic crusade to 'change the woooorld', what the fck does it matter what I think.

All the best for your important mission.

 

[Solomon]

MGtow defined

 

[Urbanyst]

Haa. Typical MGTOW-feminist think speak. Twisting people's words against them to suit their own narrative, especially when they can't come up with a counter argument of their own. Again just more emotive nonsensical splutters and crying. Woohoo, 'deep sh!!!!t'. Haa. You do make me laugh, you lot.

You think your list demonstrates applying values, a few superficial 'standards' that you borrow / have been told by some other MGTOW incel keyboard jockey.

This is the internet dude. If your view of women is so overly pessimistic that you go on some pathetic crusade to 'change the woooorld', what the fck does it matter what I think.

All the best for your important mission.

You're the only one twisting words. You are also the only angry one lol.

 

[zekko]

A 50 year old guy should not be interested in a 20 year old girl. If he is, there must have been something of an arrested development somewhere along the line.

I think there are some guys her who would take exception to what you're saying. But as a 56 year old, I'll tell you my take on it:

I'm sure that if I live to be 80 or 90, 20 year old females will still appeal to me physically. Just as they do now.
But it's hard for me to imagine having a serious relationship with a 20 year old girl at my age. She is just starting out on her life, she has a lot to experience yet. We're in two completely different places in our lives. Not sure how well I could relate to her, or her to me.

My girlfriend is 15 years younger than I am, so it's like she's from a bit of a different culture, but there is some crossover too. We seem to have enough in common.

But even though 20 year old females will likely always appeal to me physically, as I've gotten older I've come to appreciate older women as well. Some of them retain a lot of their sensual appeal, and many of them are eager to please.

 

[The Duke]

I'm all about a website like Yelp except for girls you have dated. Post reviews on each one. The girls that exhibit bad behavior(cluster b traits, flakey, lack of emotional control, too many partners, etc) will get a bad rating.

Kind of like thedirty.com I've actually dated a girl that was one there but didn't know it until after we broke up. The majority of what was posted about her was true.

 

[Epicwinguy]

I cant bang an obese woman? Drat!

 

[AJ84]

So basically, for this to work, every guy who can't hook up with those young, attractive, skinny girls (or just likes bigger women for whatever reason) would basically have to stop having sex with the women they can get. All with the hopes that obese women who put forth no effort today to lose weight to land a quality man will suddenly find the inspiration to lose weight to land a quality man tomorrow.... because men who cannot land quality women themselves are no longer having sex with them?



Or...they'll just start blowing their bosses at the age of 34 for that big raise, if they aren't already independent and making enough money to support themselves, then move out, file for divorce and come back looking for alimony and child support because they know that it will be their last chance to get anything out of a man. Kind of like a 29 year old running back who knows he doesn't have much left in the tank, so looks for that huge payday contract that will set him up for life.



Multiple wives who are miserable because they are essentially forced to deal with a situation they don't truly want to, due to the desperation of circumstances and lack of choice. Why stop at 1 disgruntled wife when you can have 3 of them? Sounds pleasantly wonderful.



What? Child support has nothing to do with whether a child is born in or out of wedlock. It is based on who has custody. You can be married 15 years and have 3 kids with that faithful, pretty, little wife of yours and still end up paying child support for all 3 of them if she gets custody in divorce, regardless of who files for that divorce.

What's funny is he thinks there will multiple wives to be had when he essentially discards over half the female population by boycotting overweight women, 35 yrs + women, and single moms. That leaves about a fraction of women left and a whole lot of thirsty men so in reality it would be more likely there would be multiple husbands not wives.

 

[Urbanyst]

What's funny is he thinks there will multiple wives to be had when he essentially discards over half the female population by boycotting overweight women, 35 yrs + women, and single moms. That leaves about a fraction of women left and a whole lot of thirsty men so in reality it would be more likely there would be multiple husbands not wives.

All the desperate guys here with low standards are revealing themselves lol.

 

[AJ84]

All the desperate guys here with low standards are revealing themselves lol.

I'm not a guy, and in the context of multiple wives it's true.
Let's say your undesirable women disappeared. Sure, that leaves only woman you want to date, with millions more men now competing for them, those 'desperate' men with ' no standards' who settled for women you don't want and hence were not in your way of getting your desired women.
There would be much more men than women, so if you think it's a women's sexual market now, well......and if you factor in multiple wives, only the top, top status men would be collecting said wives which would leave many many men with access to no women.
Are you a top top status man?
Look at places like Saudi Arabia, where polygamy is legal. Do you think average Joe Mohammed has two or more of the hottest and youngest wives? Think again.

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

All the desperate guys here with low standards are revealing themselves lol.

I'm all for a girlcott.

But seriously, I half agree with you. Yes, we need standards, but I'd apply them more to the woman's character. That said, I'd still like to see her physically tidy...

 

[Urbanyst]

Ha. The only thing being revealed here is that the guy who thinks he has a global solution also thinks child support is just for dudes who knock up chicks out of wedlock.

What's next? How banning women who don't swallow will lead to peace in the Middle East?

I think you're reading into things too much.

This was meant to be a fun red pill thread about standards. Many of you need to lighten up lol.

 

[zekko]

Let's say your undesirable women disappeared. Sure, that leaves only woman you want to date, with millions more men now competing for them, those 'desperate' men with ' no standards' who settled for women you don't want and hence were not in your way of getting your desired women.

I see constant complaints here from guys who say that the "betas" are ruining women because they are putting them on pedestals, svcking up to them, giving them likes on Facebook, giving them money, and basically doing whatever they want. If you shrink the female dating pool of "undesirables", how much worse is that situation going to get? Seems to me the "AFCs" will ramp up their "beta game" to double what it was before, or more.

 

[Red Legg]

F*ck MGTOW. I have a much better idea.

All men WORLDWIDE need to boycott dating the following women:

*Obese
*Anyone over 35
*Single Mothers

Word on the street is women are more picky today than ever:
https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/are-men-at-a-disadvantage-in-modern-dating/

If all men boycott the types of women I listed, it will balance things out in the favor or men. Here is why:

* Fat women will not exist or they will be very rare. Only 1% of the population is genetically predisposed to obesity.
* Women will become more loyal and family oriented because they know once they pass 35 the game is over.
*Men will be able to have multiple wives
*Child support will never happen because women will only get pregnant in marriage. Only MEN will initiate divorces which will basically destroy a woman's life (the opposite of what happens today)

By far the dumbest boycott proposal in the history of SS...

 

[SteR]

I see constant complaints here from guys who say that the "betas" are ruining women because they are putting them on pedestals, svcking up to them, giving them likes on Facebook, giving them money, and basically doing whatever they want. If you shrink the female dating pool of "undesirables", how much worse is that situation going to get? Seems to me the "AFCs" will ramp up their "beta game" to double what it was before, or more.

The other thing is even if the above is true, it's still the women who will lose out in the end. They'll have all these sub-par orbiters giving them validation, but they'll never find the guys they desire or they'll mistakenly gloss over them thinking they can 'do better'. Suddenly they'll find their a decade older and their pool of available options has got even smaller.

 

[zekko]

The other thing is even if the above is true, it's still the women who will lose out in the end. They'll have all these sub-par orbiters giving them validation, but they'll never find the guys they desire or they'll mistakenly gloss over them thinking they can 'do better'. Suddenly they'll find their a decade older and their pool of available options has got even smaller.

No, they'll just have less competition. They probably won't be able to get the so-called "alphas", but according to PUA Bro Theory, when women hit the wall at 30, they "settle for a beta" anyway. This wouldn't be any different, they'll just have a bigger pool of betas to choose from.

 

[SteR]

But that's what I mean: What use is it having 1000 orbiters if you're not attracted to any of them?

 

[resilient]

But that's what I mean: What use is it having 1000 orbiters if you're not attracted to any of them?

I imagine they "settle" with their favorite pick...

Moar orbiters = Moar infinite options.

 

[Urbanyst]

By far the dumbest boycott proposal in the history of SS...

Only if you have low standards lol.