That seems more like a pie chart rather than a Venn diagram.
This is more along the lines of a Venn diagram breakdown:
The blue circle would be composed of men who can attract hot women primarily through physical attraction.
The red would be composed of men who can attract hot women primarily through wealth.
The purple area would be men who attract hot women through both wealth and attraction.
The black would be in a circle of its own if we claim such men do not attract women.
The problem with the above diagram is that it is far too simple, even if we consider it to be a broad generalization and allow for exceptions. For example, it is not unusual for a guy in his late teens or early 20's to attract hot women even when he is broke, while the same generally cannot be said of broke men in their 30's, 40's and beyond. Can it happen for these older, broke guys? Sure. But it's certainly an exception rather than the norm.
If you wanted to factor age into all of this through Venn diagrams, sh*t can start to get pretty complicated and you end up with more groups of men all with different success levels:
Naturally, the ideal place to be is wealthy and attractive at any age (green categories).
Average looking men over 30 who are wealthy (maroon) will often fair better than attractive men over 30 who are broke (dark brown), but both will manage to attract women.
Men under 30 who are attractive but broke will likely fair just as well as men over 30 who are wealthy but not terribly attractive.
If you want to start drawing Venn diagrams that include confidence, maturity, game....whatever.... it gets far too complicated to be even worth a breakdown.