I did indeed.
With regards to
@Rainman4707 a couple of thoughts. Firstly have you sat down with her and explained rationally why you do not desire marriage? Secondly have you explained to her that your house will be held as your own asset outside of any marriage (that's a pretty simple pre-nump)? If the answer to these questions is yes, what was her response?
If she is in her early 30's she has plenty of time left for baby making. If she tells you she is too invested, she needs to have kids now, etc., then my guess is she wants to lasso you in particular and doesn't want to have to go to the trouble of finding someone else to try and lasso (which may take years depending on what she brings to the table and what her standards happen to be.)
I know 3 women who purposefully had children out of wedlock. Of those, 1 is still with the father of her kids (they have been together 20+ years, she is a vet & he is an EMT), so they are both in similar fields. The other two are not. One of those has a grown son and a 12 year live-in LTR and is stable and she & her guy are happy. The other gal is getting married for the first time in her 40s and her son is already grown (but she is about to be a step-mom to 2 young kids.) The couple who is still together thought marriage was silly 20 some years ago and still think it is silly now. But she is a serious exception as women go because she really doesn't give two hoots what other women think of her situation.
Most women REALLY care how they are perceived by other women. As a single woman in a couples world (as people pair off) social opportunities are lost and other women see the single person as a threat, especially if the single person is prettier or has a better figure. Women can be vicious mate guards in social settings so women put tremendous pressure on other women to settle down. This pressure happens to men too but to much lesser degree.
If your GF thinks she is going to lasso you (i.e. manipulate you or ultimatum you into getting married) just be BLUNT about it and tell her that will not work. If BEING MARRIED is more important than BEING WITH YOU then you soon have your answer.
The problem you face and the gamble you take is that most desirable women want to be married and they know they have enough value to be able to hold out for marriage. So if you have an otherwise good girl and you have someone who will make a good mother, it's worth weighing. Marriage is still the best environment for child rearing so long as the marriage is good. Pregnancy still even today has certain physical risks and hazards as does childbirth itself. There is still a social stigma in well bred social circles about illegitimate children that some segments of society take seriously. It is a tall order to expect a woman from a well to do background to risk pregnancy and child bearing without a wedding ring. What if he bails on you when you are terribly sick during the pregnancy? Who will support you if you become bedridden? What if the child has issues? Those are all things her family and her mother and her friends are going to put into her ear, and they are legit concerns frankly.
You better off with a girl with whom you think marriage is a good idea first then consider that person for the mother of your children. If you don't want to marry this girl you should NOT have kids with her. I don't think it's a wise idea. Marriage has a benefit for the men that nobody here is really talking about.
Marriage allows a man to control who has access to his offspring.
Protecting your offspring is paramount to their well-being. That includes protecting them from other men (who won't care about them and could abuse them or harm them or their mother) without you being able to intercede.
Lots to consider here.