Income Percentage to Spend on Women?

[bigneil]

Let's cut to the chase scene. Dating is about mating and mating is about resources exchanged for fertility. That is the battery that drives the species. We should be thankful that women are so impossible to please. If not for them, we wouldn't have cities and skyscrapers. Men would be perfectly happy living in tents with Nintendo's.

So that said, men realize they have to spend a certain amount of money in the dating game. Consider that a woman living on welfare gets the equivalent of $65,000 a year from the state ($40,000 after taxes or so). So unless a man makes triple figures, even the most useless women can (paradoxically) laugh at him and pretend they are too good for him (thanks, welfare state!)

What percentage of your income do you think should be allotted to spending money on women (including dinners, vacations, trips, gifts, drinks, parties, strip clubs etc)?

 

[Poonani Maker]

Less than 10%, somewhere around 7%. It's kinda like a tithe to a church. I do go to church every now and then and tithe there too. The welfare state Is the females spouse these days if they so choose. It's sad that they were allowed to vote. It's been a constant series of getting more benefits for All women in general decade in and decade out sucking money outta us. If that welfare was ripped out from under them, they'd MUST resort to finding a man and finding a man FAST. It would be a matter of survival, not just living a life of luxury.

 

[BeTheChange]

Let's cut to the chase scene. Dating is about mating and mating is about resources exchanged for fertility.

Wrong. Dating is about the exchange of value. If she sees the majority of your value as the resources you own then you're a beta/ provider in her eyes. Not exactly something to be proud of...

That is the battery that drives the species. We should be thankful that women are so impossible to please. If not for them, we wouldn't have cities and skyscrapers. Men would be perfectly happy living in tents with Nintendo's.

Bullsh*t. This is how feminists think and it cheapens men to idiots who are driven to live their lives solely in pursuit of pleasing women. One dimensional caricatures have no basis in reality.

So that said, men realize they have to spend a certain amount of money in the dating game. Consider that a woman living on welfare gets the equivalent of $65,000 a year from the state ($40,000 after taxes or so). So unless a man makes triple figures, even the most useless women can (paradoxically) laugh at him and pretend they are too good for him (thanks, welfare state!)

You're only "too good" for a women if you buy into her frame. Besides fewer and fewer women place any real value on a man's resources until they hit the wall and then you aren't eliciting any real genuine desire. Who wants that?

What percentage of your income do you think should be allotted to spending money on women (including dinners, vacations, trips, gifts, drinks, parties, strip clubs etc)?

I don't "allot" any amount of my income to spend specifically on women and I think any guy who does has his priorities wrong. I budget for "good times" - clubbing on the weekend, holidays, weekend breaks out the city, expensive hobbies and yes of course dates too.

 

[thatfeel]

Consider that a woman living on welfare gets the equivalent of $65,000 a year from the state ($40,000 after taxes or so). So unless a man makes triple figures, even the most useless women can (paradoxically) laugh at him and pretend they are too good for him (thanks, welfare state!)

Bro you are seriously retarded.

 

[therobman7]

oh wait... % of income? eesh... like others, I alot money to "going out" and work from there

 

[SgtSplacker]

5% for me is about $300 and that's way more than I spend on a girl in a month wtf.

I think we all need to stop taking girls out to dinner as a default. Women view dinners as some kind of financial test. If a person is getting free stuff from any other person you can never really know if they are into you or what you can do for them. I think we should all treat dinners like more of an endgame thing to be done after you feel it is a compatible match.

 

[bigneil]

Wrong. Dating is about the exchange of value.

Yes, and the male value is 90% resources, 10% looks, while a female value is 90% looks, 10% resources.

If she sees the majority of your value as the resources you own then you're a beta/ provider in her eyes. Not exactly something to be proud of...

True, there is a fine line, but if she offers unlimited sex and is low to medium maintenance, that's as good as it gets. Spend as little resources as possible, but getting to the unlimited sex with the girl of your dreams, getting the girl of your dreams to do everything right (80%+ interest level) is expensive when you are on the road. If you are still in your hometown, not so much. Tell me you wouldn't give your last girlfriend a couple hundred to have all her negative points go away.

How much you spend and how attracted she is are two different things. If she is attracted, the more generous you are the more attracted she gets. If she is not attracted, the more generous you are, the less attracted she gets.

Do you think Donald Trump spent a lot on his first few dates with Melania? He probably whisked her off to Paris on his private jet. I would prefer to do that than sip beers at Applebee's on her credit card and think she likes me for me.

Having more money is more Alpha. You can't cheap your way through and declare it Beta to have more resources.

BTW - I'm regarding the OP quote of "resources for fertility" quoting Stefan Molyneux, my favorite talk radio host who can be found on youtube.

Rich men are to poor men what 20 year old women are to 40 year old women.

 

[bigneil]

Bro you are seriously retarded.

Insults are not arguments. What I said is a fact, Latisha. Have a point, and try again.

 

[devilkingx2]

less than the equivalent amount of sex with an equivalent hooker.

so if she's a 5/10 and you have sex once a week, how much would once a week sex with a mediocre hooker cost you?

but if she's a 9/10 who is kinkier than you can imagine and likes to fvck 3 times a day, well, how much would kinky sex with a 9/10 hooker 3 times a day cost you?

less money is always better of course, in a perfect world she'll be spending money on you as gratitude for the great sex, but we don't live in a perfect world.

the main idea is that you don't want to be spending more than what your getting is worth, no need to be one of these loser betas who pays out the ass for table scraps, but no need to be cheap if your girlfriend acts like your personal porn star either

 

[bigneil]

oh wait... % of income? eesh... like others, I alot money to "going out" and work from there

I just mean budget. For example, you take a girl for a 3 night weekend in Boston it costs about $3400, and you might have to cover her to take time off work (most people are living paycheck to paycheck and working 6 days, and vacation implies paid vacation). That is a lot if you earn $3400 a month. That's not a lot if you earn $3400 a day. So somewhere in between, some percentage of income along with some expectation of date quality defines roughly the proper amount. Case in point: they say save 10%. I think 10% on women is also about right. For me, that means I can afford to spend $660 a week on dates. So I find 5 star hotels with hot tubs in the room. When you only see a girl 3 times in a month, but have incredible events planned, they tend to be a lot of fun.

 

[BeTheChange]

Yes, and the male value is 90% resources, 10% looks, while a female value is 90% looks, 10% resources.


True, there is a fine line, but if she offers unlimited sex and is low to medium maintenance, that's as good as it gets. Spend as little resources as possible, but getting to the unlimited sex with the girl of your dreams, getting the girl of your dreams to do everything right (80%+ interest level) is expensive when you are on the road. If you are still in your hometown, not so much. Tell me you wouldn't give your last girlfriend a couple hundred to have all her negative points go away.

How much you spend and how attracted she is are two different things. If she is attracted, the more generous you are the more attracted she gets. If she is not attracted, the more generous you are, the less attracted she gets.

Do you think Donald Trump spent a lot on his first few dates with Melania? He probably whisked her off to Paris on his private jet. I would prefer to do that than sip beers and Applebee's on her credit card and think she likes me for me.

Having more money is Alpha. You can't cheap your way through and declare it Beta to have more resources.

BTW - I'm regarding the OP quote of "resources for fertility" quoting Stefan Molyneux, my favorite talk radio host who can be found on youtube.

Rich men are to poor men what 20 year old women are to 40 year old women.

LOL. So much nonsense in here it beggars belief. You are delusional brother. There's not much to add beyond what's already been said but clearly you are thoroughly invested in this idea of your wealth translating into legitimate sexual interest. However in the real world your theories don't hold any real weight.

Your last comment is textbook ego preservation and completely false by the way, as is most of your post. But If it makes you feel better then fair enough.

If you enjoy spending money on women do so. Do what makes you happy. But you're not embracing reality if you think money is superior to game, status and looks in eliciting genuine sexual desire.

 

[bigneil]

LOL. So much nonsense in here it beggars belief. You are delusional brother. There's not much to add beyond what's already been said but clearly you are thoroughly invested in this idea of your wealth translating into legitimate sexual interest. However in the real world your theories don't hold any real weight.

Your last comment is textbook ego preservation and completely false by the way, as is most of your post. But If it makes you feel better then fair enough.

If you enjoy spending money on women do so. Do what makes you happy. But you're not embracing reality if you think money is superior to game, status and looks in eliciting genuine sexual desire.

One of us got 10 phone numbers in the past week. One of us seduced a beauty seated alone at a restaurant table last night, getting her number in 5 minutes. One of us kissed a 23 year old girl last night. One of us kissed a 21 year old and 25 year old woman on Halloween (at the same time), getting a text the next day that "everyone loves you". One of us made a 20 year old super model have her first orgasm last week. One of us has been dating beautiful women for 28 years. One of us earns $1320 per day, every business day. Gee, I wonder which one? That's the reality I'm embracing. Money is superior to no money. Period. Looks and game are a bonus. I have those also. And PS - Money IS Status.

 

[bigneil]

Whenever I meet a new girl, they without fail tell me I have the most beautiful eyes. I'm told they are hypnotic. It gets me in like Flynn with every woman I meet. I've kissed about 25 women this year. In the past 6 months I picked up not one but two strippers who were off duty and outside the club at the time we met (i.e., the super hot girl at the bar). Last week two people approached me (one a man, both African American by coincidence, both in different cities) and told me I look like Russell Crowe.

So the question is: as someone as good looking as I am goes through life (living in 12 states in 12 years), how do I get THE most beautiful women I see to go out with me? I do it by looking good, dressing sharp and (Trigger warning) spending money and being generous. And poor men want to say "Aha! She only wants you for your money!" Wrong. I start from a position of being a successful seducer. The money is the next step of getting women 25 years my junior to get excited.

Get this: once women are attracted, they want to have a family with you which requires about a million dollars in 2016. They are not gold diggers. They are smart.

Here is what the women on Halloween said. "Don't you love him? Look at his eyes. He's a good kisser also but he never calls me. He has a great job. And he's so tall. He's 6'5. And look at his dimples. You are so hot. Seriously, I want to take you home with me tonight". They were both saying this in each ear. I got the hell out of there. One sent a text telling me she loves me.

You see, it's possible to have money and looks and game. That's the way you get the 20 year old (i.e., first choice) women.

At my age, seducing women "for free" would take too long. Most people are living in their home town where everyone already knows them and where everyone rates their status based on YEARS ago. Succeeding in your home town is not the same as having game. Only someone in a city they have never been to, out in a new location by themselves, can prove they have game.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

One of us got 10 phone numbers in the past week. One of us seduced a beauty seated alone at a restaurant table last night, getting her number in 5 minutes. One of us kissed a 23 year old girl last night. One of us kissed a 21 year old and 25 year old woman on Halloween (at the same time), getting a text the next day that "everyone loves you". One of us made a 20 year old super model have her first orgasm last week. One of us has been dating beautiful women for 28 years. One of us earns $1320 per day, every business day. Gee, I wonder which one? That's the reality I'm embracing. Money is superior to no money. Period. Looks and game are a bonus. I have those also. And PS - Money IS Status.

Thing about the looks and we know making money much more money than you should IS ALPHA. But thing about looks is they will bone you and you don't need anything but to show up.

With the money, they can use you for money and still feed you crumbs of affections.

 

[BeTheChange]

One of us got 10 phone numbers in the past week. One of us seduced a beauty seated alone at a restaurant table last night, getting her number in 5 minutes. One of us kissed a 23 year old girl last night. One of us kissed a 21 year old and 25 year old woman on Halloween (at the same time), getting a text the next day that "everyone loves you". One of us made a 20 year old super model have her first orgasm last week. One of us has been dating beautiful women for 28 years. One of us earns $1320 per day, every business day. Gee, I wonder which one? That's the reality I'm embracing. Money is superior to no money. Period. Looks and game are a bonus. I have those also. And PS - Money IS Status.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Aren't you the guy who was struggling to bang strippers you'd thrown money at?

And If you think money equals status you still don't get it.

FWIW last year I made over $100k...at 26.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Aren't you the guy who was struggling to bang strippers you'd thrown money at?

And If you think money equals status you still don't get it.

FWIW last year I made over $100k...at 26.

He doesn't even need to throw them money...

 

[Bible_Belt]

One of us earns $1320 per day

I make about that much in a year, and I still get laid, including in just the past year, an (ex) stripper, a 21 y/o, and an 18 y/o.

Oh wait, that's because I live in my home town! I get it now. No game required. Every broke guy who lives in his hometown is banging women half his age, of course! That makes perfect sense.

 

[marmel75]

As little as possible to get what you want.

 

[bigneil]

As I type this, there is a 19 year old beauty sleeping in my bed (a testament to how much I like SS). I met her 6 months ago when she was my favorite waitress at a Hooters-type place but she quit. She was my Facebook friend and apparently (shockingly) developed a crush on me from my posts, in particular extensive photos of the 20 year old (whose name she recited after mine when she ran over and hugged me). Tonight I ran into her off duty at her old work and we played pool, I gave her a massage, and she started kissing me. I managed to get her a hotel room because she had an hour round trip and had to return in the morning. That's 2 pairs of panties I confiscated in a span of 6 days, the 2 youngest girls I was ever with. And they are both Pink brand! And I didn't even have to get dinner for this one.

As we were going up the elevator to the hotel room I saw her text her boyfriend "I love you". The next time your girl texts that, beware.

I make about that much in a year, and I still get laid, including in just the past year, an (ex) stripper, a 21 y/o, and an 18 y/o.

So to summarize, Bible_Belt makes $1320 a year and had 3 hot, young girls this year. I make $1320 a day and dated 6 hot, young girls (ages 20, 22, 21, 25, 26 and 19) in the past 6 days.

 

[bigneil]

I'll admit, normally the young girls I've dated were strippers who require a few hundred to be spent before anything "free" happens, but tonight was proof that you can learn from them and apply it to equally hot, equally young non-strippers who aren't so cash focused. This one is 27 years my junior (and said she's been with older men than me). Did you know that strippers will calculate how much the "free" sex they gave you is worth and keep a rolling total in their head? Stripper dark secret #15,136.

I was reading about chemicals that happen during sex. The woman produces oxytocin which is the cuddle/bonding chemical. That's what causes that feeling you get when they cling to you like a cat on your lap. Men meanwhile produce dopamine, serotonin and testosterone which makes them get off and then want to go foraging for more women (which probably explains why I left her in bed energized after she passed out).