If you can't get laid in 2016, somethings wrong..

[Ronaldo7]

If you are good-looking & hit the weights, along with possessing charm, you'll be having to turn down women more than you ever imagined.

You'll be inundated with so many options.

 

[Dhoulmagus]

If you are good-looking & hit the weights, along with possessing charm, you'll be having to turn down women more than you ever imagined.

You'll be inundated with so many options.

I know a guy that looks like a buff zach efron and he has had sex with 5 girls at one time.

 

[Ronaldo7]

I know a guy that looks like a buff zach efron and he has had sex with 5 girls at one time.

It's not as clear as the OP has mentioned.

There are unbreakable standards for one to get laid. It doesn't work quite like he has mentioned.

He thinks because it is 2016 one can get laid very easily. Unfortunately, if one is overweight & unattractive, one will not have any acceptable options.

Either one has to pay for fornication or one has to settle for the visual atrocities one has the misfortune to encounter sometimes.

 

[Dhoulmagus]

It's not as clear as the OP has mentioned.

There are unbreakable standards for one to get laid. It doesn't work quite like he has mentioned.

He thinks because it is 2016 one can get laid very easily. Unfortunately, if one is overweight & unattractive, one will not have any acceptable options.

Either one has to pay for fornication or one has to settle for the visual atrocities one has the misfortune to encounter sometimes.

I see a lot of women with beer gutted bros. Most women don't think long term and just want Mr.Fun. If a guy is Mr.Fun then he is most likely neglecting other parts of his life such as finances, school, and etc. The ultimate Mr.Fun are rich guys without any responsibilities and loads of free time. These are your show offy rich guys, celebrities, and athletes. Women don't dream of marrying mark zucheburg but they'll drool over Channing Taytum.

 

[Ronaldo7]

I see a lot of women with beer gutted bros. Most women don't think long term and just want Mr.Fun. If a guy is Mr.Fun then he is most likely neglecting other parts of his life such as finances, school, and etc. The ultimate Mr.Fun are rich guys without any responsibilities and loads of free time. These are your show offy rich guys, celebrities, and athletes. Women don't dream of marrying mark zucheburg but they'll drool over Channing Taytum.

We are talking specifically about getting laid. Chances are they will bang a poor, good-looking individual over a rich, unattractive individual. And they will most likely have a relationship with the rich, unattractive individual at the same time. However, that isn't an obstacle for primal instincts to duly have their success.

They can have the best of both worlds. Have the rich life and enjoy fornication with the better mate.

 

[Slime93]

Sounds like a load of BS to me.

You are a millennial by definition.

And your logic is flawed. Females want a impressive husband and babies. When they can't find that they'll settle for serial dating. But if you know how to handle a girl she'll want to go exclusive with you no matter her age.

 

[Slash Dolo]

The OP is right. Sex is easy to get. My looks are around an 8 and I can pull tail just about anytime I want. But it sucks. I've come to really look down upon sex. I feel controlled by it; like if I get horny I'm going to waste an evening sticking my d*ck in something when that time could be spent doing something more productive.

I don't think that getting laid is the issue on SoSuave. It's EASY to have sex with a 7. I can call one up right now and get laid tonight. Hell, I've got an 8 on call too. You just have to know what you're doing. You have to not rely on Tinder. Yeah you can get laid on Tinder, but looks are only 20% of it; unless you're a fitness model, Tinder's gonna be rough, even for above average looking guys. You can't display your most attractive traits on Tinder: your personality, body language and game.

The issue I've had, and this is what a lot of men experience on here I think, is finding a girl who actually interests you and breaks the mold. She doesn't have to be a 9, but we want to pull interesting, attractive women. But when you get down to it they're all the same. The hotter they are, the sh*ttier they are because chumps chase them constantly; effectively making your job harder. The less hot they are, the easier they are; but they are easier for a reason. When it's all said and done they are all the same. They just aren't interesting to interact with. When you find one that breaks the mold you'll probably blow it because you come across too interested. Because you actually are. Or you can pull off an acting job to land her, but is that really what you want? You're not even getting an Oscar for the performance, either.

At the end of the day we may have different goals but the universal goal for everyone here is that we want to date interesting and attractive women. And it's much easier said than done.

 

[dutchmaster]

I disagree that things are easier.. Game has to be more viscous nowadays, you really gotta excel in reminding these chicks they aren't the prizes they think the are to bang a lot of different girls. If you have the stomach to do it right, it's not that hard. But you need something that draws them in to you, good looks or well dressed or mysterious aura, there's things you can do to gain more female attention then you need to know how to turn it into your favor.

 

[3agle 3yes]

I highly doubt getting laid with quality women is any easier (or harder) now than it was 30 or 40 years ago.

You're only as good as your competition...when an attractive woman is getting 200+ replies on a dating site, she will only respond to 0.1% of them (maybe even less).

More options = more selectivity.

Yes attractive women have a lot of options but if you're a quality man, you'll know that 95% (or more) of those are lower quality than you.

 

[BlueAlpha1]

I highly doubt getting laid with quality women is any easier (or harder) now than it was 30 or 40 years ago.

You're only as good as your competition...when an attractive woman is getting 200+ replies on a dating site, she will only respond to 0.1% of them (maybe even less).

More options = more selectivity.

Yes attractive women have a lot of options but if you're a quality man, you'll know that 95% (or more) of those are lower quality than you.

Exactly. There are too many guys on this forum claiming to have a harem of 8's and 9's on call. There are a few options here.

1. They are very tall or have an amazing physique.
2. They have a lot of money.
3. They play a sport at least at a college level.
4. They play an amazing guitar.
5. They are lying.

OR,

They are average dudes but are approaching hundreds of women every month. Then, sure, the numbers game pays off a few times.

But no, most women don't reply to PUA pickup lines anymore from average dudes in clubs. But there is this obsession guys have for being perceived, truthfully or not, as a guy with options. I can understand it, but it doesn't make it so

 

[PeasantPlayer]

Just because there is a "study" doesn't mean it is scientifically accurate. People lie on those tests and they are unreliable and they study a small sample size of the 7 billion people in the world, and a lot or a little sex can vary from person to person

 

[PeasantPlayer]

Where are these 9s at? I live in the 3rd biggest city in America and I have not seen a 9 yet. I have seen 8s

 

[Dhoulmagus]

Where are these 9s at? I live in the 3rd biggest city in America and I have not seen a 9 yet. I have seen 8s

They are full **** obviously lol. I don't even rate girls when I mention them in my topics.

 

[Asmodeus]

They are full **** obviously lol. I don't even rate girls when I mention them in my topics.

Rating girls makes no sense...
Everyone has their likes and dislikes. Some people will rate one girl higher for one reason, but another lower for the same reason. A 8 to me may be a 6 to you or vice versa. Forget the ratings, just find women which simply satisfy your own personal tastes whatever they may be and enjoy whatever you like.

 

[raider87]

Forget the ratings, just find women which simply satisfy your own personal tastes whatever they may be and enjoy whatever you like.

Yes, rating women is still putting them on a pedestal.

 

[skinnyguy]

Bragging about lay count in 2016 means nothing. Most guys I know are willing to have sex with fat pigs. And then they brag that they got laid.

 

[LiveYourDream]

Clarification on what was suggested to be fact...

This thread is contradicting the latest study that people are having less sex not more.
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/index....ng-less-sex-than-previous-generations.235153/

Just because there is a "study" doesn't mean it is scientifically accurate.

@PeasantPlayer is on it. The "latest study" referenced by @mr. kennedy does not actually support the generalization he implies. The 'source' he referenced (a crappy 'article', imho) made a generalization, as if it was a fact. He then created a thread on SS perpetuating that generalization. He then joined this thread implying it is fact from "the latest study." It appears, to me, it was simply a generalization made at someone's keyboard and then published in mainstream media, and likely picked up as interesting and brought on to SS (most likely unaware it was unsubstantiated.)

When people read the thread title, 'Millennials (Generation y) are having less sex than previous generations', I don't think people limit their view, to only include those aged 15-19, involved in vaginal penetration, from 1988-2013. That's what the study looked at. Those older than 19...no data. After 2013...no data.

I think it is inaccurate to imply from that small age subset, that all millennials are therefore doing anything.

It goes beyond that. In fact, the actual research, shows the trend (of 15-19 year-olds) going toward having more sex than was, in the 1-2 previous periods (males-2, females-1).

(As a side note: For 2011-2013, Approx 2/3 of males and 2/3 of females reported to have lost their virginity by 19 years of age.)

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db209.htm#teenagers

 

[Asmodeus]

^That was a bunk study...

However, I would believe it if millennials had less sex. Millennials refuse to get into relationships and this is very strongly supported by statistics (I mean just look at the marriage age increases for one). I know people who have not had girlfriends for years. Some do not even want one... I am technically gen X but apart form the occasional one night stand I do not have a lot going on, or at least far less than I had when I was in a relationship.
It is true that people in relationships (healthy ones at least) have more sex. This is simply because they have direct access to it from a partner. Two people in a relationship would have sex at least multiple times a week. Therefore, if we extrapolate this, we can assume that millennials have less sex because they are less inclined toward relationships.

In which case... I agree... There is no rational need to be in a relationship these days. Why buy the cow and have to put all the work into it when there are so many cows giving their milk away for free? Certainly the supply of milk is less constant than if you had your own cow, but you still do not have to buy the cow.

 

[BlueAlpha1]

Bragging about lay count in 2016 means nothing. Most guys I know are willing to have sex with fat pigs. And then they brag that they got laid.

YES! YES! YES!

Thank you.

 

[Trunks]

This will be short and sweet because im sleepy

In 2016 women seem to me to be sluttier than ever. I go downtown to the bars they are wearing next to nothing.
Im seeing below average guys taking home girls.

Tinder literally translates to: Meet you once, if you aren't creepy or smelly, ill blow ya..

When I got into this stuff in 2006 i feel like women made you do a lot more to get laid, now I feel like having multiple plates is atleast 3x as easy as it was back then.

You were 10 when you started?