4 Year Old Jumps In Gorilla Cage

[Tenacity]

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/small-child-falls-gorilla-enclosure-zoo-39455400

A chick named Michelle Gregg (along with her thug/criminal baby daddy Deonne ****erson), let their 4 year old kid out of their sight and his bad a.ss LEAPED into a damn gorilla cage/enclosure. I'm sure you guys have heard about this story. Deonne (the thug/criminal baby daddy) has a long history of all types of criminal shyt. There's even some people saying Michelle had two of her kids (she has 4 altogether) taken away before due to child neglect!

My questions are as follows:

- How in the hell is this zoo setup to where 4 year old, bad a.ss kids from 300lb black chicks and thug/criminal baby daddies....can LEAP their a.ss into a gorilla enclosure?

- Why is this chick allowed to walk away with her kid, and Child Protective Services didn't come and take his bad a.ss away from her?

- What was this 300lb chick and her thug/criminal baby daddy doing, that allowed their 4 year old to disappear out of their sight and LEAP into a gorilla cage?

An endangered species (gorilla) had to be shot and killed, because an irresponsible, ghetto, thug/criminal loving chick couldn't control her bad a.ss kids? And there's been NOTHING done in terms of punishment to the mother, the father, etc.?

Urghhhh....

You can go here to sign petitions to help bring justice in this situation. I want fat a.ss thug/criminal loving Michelle Gregg to pay for this shyt in one way or another.

https://www.change.org/p/cincinnati-zoo-justice-for-harambe
https://www.change.org/p/dept-of-children-and-families-have-cps-investigate-michelle-gregg

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

At the very least the zoo should sue her for damages. I don't know what criminal charges they could conceivably bring.

Meanwhile, over in the Asian section of sh*tty parent land:


(apologies for the thread jack)

GSDF joins search for missing Hokkaido boy

Yamato Tanooka has been missing since last Saturday after his parents said they made him get out their car on a mountain road as punishment for misbehaving. He is reportedly without food or water.

 

[CuddleJunkie]

At the very least the zoo should sue her for damages. I don't know what criminal charges they could conceivably bring.

Meanwhile, over in the Asian section of sh*tty parent land:


(apologies for the thread jack)

GSDF joins search for missing Hokkaido boy

Japanese people is weird.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/small-child-falls-gorilla-enclosure-zoo-39455400

A chick named Michelle Gregg (along with her thug/criminal baby daddy Deonne ****erson), let their 4 year old kid out of their sight and his bad a.ss LEAPED into a damn gorilla cage/enclosure. I'm sure you guys have heard about this story. Deonne (the thug/criminal baby daddy) has a long history of all types of criminal shyt. There's even some people saying Michelle had two of her kids (she has 4 altogether) taken away before due to child neglect!

My questions are as follows:

- How in the hell is this zoo setup to where 4 year old, bad a.ss kids from 300lb black chicks and thug/criminal baby daddies....can LEAP their a.ss into a gorilla enclosure?

- Why is this chick allowed to walk away with her kid, and Child Protective Services didn't come and take his bad a.ss away from her?

- What was this 300lb chick and her thug/criminal baby daddy doing, that allowed their 4 year old to disappear out of their sight and LEAP into a gorilla cage?

An endangered species (gorilla) had to be shot and killed, because an irresponsible, ghetto, thug/criminal loving chick couldn't control her bad a.ss kids? And there's been NOTHING done in terms of punishment to the mother, the father, etc.?

Urghhhh....

You can go here to sign petitions to help bring justice in this situation. I want fat a.ss thug/criminal loving Michelle Gregg to pay for this shyt in one way or another.

https://www.change.org/p/cincinnati-zoo-justice-for-harambe
https://www.change.org/p/dept-of-children-and-families-have-cps-investigate-michelle-gregg

The situation is hilarious at so many levels. The gorilla dying is not one of them. You have my sign.

 

[Bible_Belt]

I'm sure they were thinking about the lawsuit that was coming if the kid died, as they shot the gorilla. I wouldn't have pulled the trigger.

 

[Von]

That Gorilla think is going all over the net.

Some people are saying it was a crime against humanity to have shoot the Gorilla

Other says its an attack against black people because the gorilla was black (i guess they didn't figure out the kid was black too)

How the hell did a baby end up in a cage

Animal cruelty

Bad parenting

etc.... everything been thrown at it

Facts: You can't never let a baby out of your sight, the baby got in the cage (thats the real issue), a gorilla died for X reasons (maybe he was dangerous or not)... this is taking WAY to much pervasion in a issue against race/society/parenting/animal rights
......

It seems no one remembers that 20 years ago the same thing happened.... A kid of the same age felt down in a enclave of gorillas.... you know what happened? One gorilla went to the baby, pick him up and jumped up to give it back to his parents.

Yep you read that right.... 20 years ago, its the gorilla who saved the baby life. Maybe it was a female gorilla

Today's one was a male
....

 

[dustmuffin]

Human life is more important than an animal's no mater what the circumstances. Save the baby and let the tree huggers cry.

 

[Skyline]

I remember seeing an experiment on YouTube where they left a fake puppy barking really loud in an enclosed car on a hot day to see how many people would attempt to free it.

The same thing was done with a baby's cry inside of the same enclosed car on a hot day.

Let's just say if they were real babies, they would have been dead. But don't worry the dogs lived.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

It would funny if this kid grew up to be the scientist that accidentally let loose simian intelligence gene that made us all slaves to the apes.

Then people would have to come back in time to keep him from being saved, but every time they are foiled and end up making the present (future) situation worse.

(Damn dirty apes...)

 

[BlueAlpha1]

As an animal lover who worked at a pound and volunteered at the human society, it stinks that an animal was shot and killed.

That said, anyone who thinks that the wrong life was preserved is mentally deranged. A gorilla was "put down" to spare a child from drowning, or literally having his arms or head ripped off publically...

 

[Yewki]

That said, anyone who thinks that the wrong life was preserved is mentally deranged. A gorilla was "put down" to spare a child from drowning, or literally having his arms or head ripped off publically...

Suppose we knew the kid had a 99% chance to survive if the gorilla was tranquilized. Would killing the gorilla still had been the best decision?

What about a 90% chance? 80%? 50%? etc

The decision wasn't very black and white, which is why it was controversial. I personally suspect the zoo made their decision primarily with public relations in mind, realizing that if the kid happened to die because they tried to save gorilla they would get torn apart by the media much more so than just killing the gorilla. That said I don't blame the zoo nor do I really care one way or the other, but the whole dilemma is interesting nonetheless

 

[BlueAlpha1]

Suppose we knew the kid had a 99% chance to survive if the gorilla was tranquilized. Would killing the gorilla still had been the best decision?

What about a 90% chance? 80%? 50%? etc

The decision wasn't very black and white, which is why it was controversial. I personally suspect the zoo made their decision primarily with public relations in mind, realizing that if the kid happened to die because they tried to save gorilla they would get torn apart by the media much more so than just killing the gorilla. That said I don't blame the zoo nor do I really care one way or the other, but the whole dilemma is interesting nonetheless

If the tranquilizer didn't put the ape down instantly, it would have infuriated him. He would have let out an earth-shattering growl and who knows what could have happened next. That might have increased the likelihood of the boy having his arms plucked off in a fit of rage.

Granted, the gorilla might have protected him, but you never know with a wild animal. Captivity or not. Animals are unpredictable and defy behavioral trends all the time. When I was a little kid, my family took me swimming with stingrays in the Caribbean. I was nervous but they assured me they "never sting". Except when one did in the high profile killing of the Crocodile Hunter

 

[Skyline]

Suppose we knew the kid had a 99% chance to survive if the gorilla was tranquilized. Would killing the gorilla still had been the best decision?

What about a 90% chance? 80%? 50%? etc

The decision wasn't very black and white, which is why it was controversial. I personally suspect the zoo made their decision primarily with public relations in mind, realizing that if the kid happened to die because they tried to save gorilla they would get torn apart by the media much more so than just killing the gorilla. That said I don't blame the zoo nor do I really care one way or the other, but the whole dilemma is interesting nonetheless

That was a fully grown gorilla as well. One, two, three, who knows how many tranqs it would have taken for the gorilla to instantly fall over.

It's not like in the movies or anything, tranquilizer has a long time to take into effect and the gorilla could have reacted in rage from being shot at.

You kind of can't tell how big a gorilla actually is in a zoo, because you're usually far away and high up, but they are in fact massive. Just compare the kid to the gorillas arm and notice how it handles him like he weighs nothing. Tranquilizer only works almost instantly on smaller animals like cats. Even shooting it with a high dose would have taken a while.

And I agree with the Zoo looking out for public relations over the animal, customers are more important which means they must feel safe.

 

[LiveFreeX]

Maybe they should close down zoo's altogether or make it so that people can't be within 20 meters of the gorillas, like have them there but a huge glass structure on top, near encapsulating the animals. This was a failure of the park not to provide proper security people to handle this ****. Where the fck were the security guards? Why were the people allowed so close to wall beside the gorillas? This is what happens when you have a society raised by idiots that tell people they can do what they want without consequence.

 

[BlueAlpha1]

Maybe they should close down zoo's altogether or make it so that people can't be within 20 meters of the gorillas, like have them there but a huge glass structure on top, near encapsulating the animals. This was a failure of the park not to provide proper security people to handle this ****. Where the fck were the security guards? Why were the people allowed so close to wall beside the gorillas? This is what happens when you have a society raised by idiots that tell people they can do what they want without consequence.

The guards are making $9.05 an hour and are likely off in a corner checking their phones for 2/3 of their shift. Just like our taxi and bus drivers. Sad state of affairs.

It's very sad when any sentient living thing dies. It's a harsh reminder that every living thing in the universe dies. And most living things don't die with music playing, snowflakes falling outside, and family nearby as they go to sleep. The end is ugly. But I can't even begin to fathom these bleeding hearts being triggered by this act of "cruelty" (read: rational manifestation of fight or flight) when you consider the alternatives.

Oh sure, maybe the ape nestles the boy in its chest and wards off another pesky gorilla who tries to get involved. Maybe a cougar even escapes into the cage to attack the boy and the gorilla kills it. All this would make for great YouTube clickbait. Or maybe it draws and quarters the kid in front of his mother and he dies from shock and blood loss in terror and agony.

Seriously, the people who want the mother prosecuted or some such nonsense are sick human beings who do not or should not ever have kids. If a pitbull begins to drag your 4 year old around by his shirt, do you hesitate to kill it because the boy is unharmed and maybe he's "just playing"? In a do or die situation I'd kill any living thing to protect the life of my family.

 

[LiveFreeX]

Hey man, I get that... and I completely agree with you. I have no love for animals, they need to be left alone in their habitats or re-located to parks and I generally think people that own them largely make up the idiot population. I've constantly heard "Oh he's just playing with you", when some fvcking dog off a leash comes running at me. I think I've told more than a few people now, keep your dog on the damn leash or I'll bust its neck, then they proceed to have a doggy meltdown, screaming bloody murder and doing liberal somersaults for animal rights. People have become way to desensitized to danger, now that everyone and their mother has some stupid pet living with them.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Gorilla Sales Skyrocket After Latest Gorilla Attack

http://www.theonion.com/article/gorilla-sales-skyrocket-after-latest-gorilla-attac-30860