Are feminists shaming men & their sex robots because of competition or objectification?

[MatureDJ]

Here is an organization devoted to stopping the development of sex robots:

https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/

The website seems to say that their organization is against sex robots because it "objectifies" women, but methinks that it is really these women (and it seems that all the names of folks authoring essays are women) don't want the competition, as they prefer a society in which the Golden VJ is exalted above all.

And speaking of robots, isn't a vibrator the first mechanical sex robot? I don't see them b!tching about that!

Here's a Scarlett Johansson robot:

http://mashable.com/2016/04/04/scarlett-johansson-robot/#zjY71Hf2QsqH

 

[Who Dares Win]

A believe its a genuine hate toward men that makes them love the fact that men cant be satisfied, then knowledge that even a robot will probably be more feminine than them and offer a better alternative therefore limiting their power, it also has to be a hard hit to their self confidence to know that an unanimated object can win againt them.

Objectification probably not, they are more than fine to be objectified from the top dog.

 

[Yewki]

Men objectify women and vice versa because it's a part of life. It's basic biology to want to mate with the most physically healthy and fit (aka "sexy") partner. Instead of trying to justify being fat and lazy, they should... I don't know, get healthy? lol

I never in a million years would have guessed there'd be a movement against, of all things, being healthy... that would be taken seriously by a large mass of people (pun intended). Is this the movie Idiocracy?

 

[bigneil]

Socialism is the fear that somewhere, somehow, someone is happy.

 

[Serenity]

I don't know, but I do know that their shaming is having exactly the opposite effect of what they desire. They're not exactly helping themselves, the robot shuts the fvck up and doesn't b!tch and whine like they do.

The robot also doesn't shame a man for wanting a real woman, so it doesn't attack freedom. What the feminists should do is to encourage men to fvck robots, so men will fvck robots for a small period until they're bored of it. Then men would return to fvcking real women to cure their boredom.

Men (and women for that matter) want what they can't have. By threatening the existence of sex robots they're hyping it, men want it before it's too late. The expression "I've had enough of this" comes to mind, when you get so much of something that you're sick and tired of it.

That's what my parents did when they caught me smoking the first time. They didn't deny me, they offered me cigarettes. It was pretty effective, I stopped wanting it when I could have all I wanted.

 

[Alvafe]

its the same thing as I saw in a videon onse of a woman telling other womans.

she said

men don't like woman! mens like vag, they only deal with woman because of it, if they could have it without the woman they would do, we are crazy, don't know what we want, and stir drama.

that video was a seminar of how a woman could keep her man, jsut that intruduction make me laugh, and I can't say I disagree lol

so now we can make a robot who looks like a woman, will obey you without question, and can be used for sex.

pray, why deal with woman now? lol only if she is less annoying then a robot now.

 

[Amer1group]

Some women could benefit from the robots too. I once watched a movie where a mother tell her daughter that she is lucky because she has a husband that doesn't want to sleep with her. Well, there they have. It also could be that they don't want to lose the possibility of withhold sex to make a point.

 

[bigneil]

I was talking to a feminist "man" the other day. After his previously saying that the reason 90% of divorces are initiated by women is because "men are abusive", later when I mentioned Lorena Bobbit who cut off John Wayne Bobbit's penis circa 1993, he said "Well John wasn't such a great guy himself you know. After all, he did something that made his wife to cut off his penis".

Those are the feminist mantras: 1) If she did it, it's his fault, and 2) Circular logic.

 

[Tictac]

After his previously saying that the reason 90% of divorces are initiated by women is because "men are abusive"

This is full retard, progressive gibberish horse turds.

"If I say it, it's true" No research, facts or evidence required.
The Progressive Manifesto