17-year-old boy sexting with 16-year-old girl and guess who’s charged with child pornogr

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
Larry Allen is a 17-year-old standout three-sport student athlete at Parkway High School in Bossier City, La.

An award-winning wrestler, football and basketball player, Larry is beloved at school and in the community. He's never been in trouble with the law a day in his life — until now.

Larry did what millions of kids in America are doing — he exchanged naked text messages with a 16-year-old classmate.

First, she sent Larry a nude video and then he sent her one in return. Call it gross, but a recent study found that 54% of kids under the age of 18 have done so before.

Parents may hate it, but when it's consensual, it's definitely safer than in-person intercourse.

Her parents called the police when they discovered what was happening. Of course, they arrested Larry and he was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography for the video he still had of her on his phone.

Yes, she's 16 and he's 17.

Yes, she sent him a video first.

Yes, this was consensual.

Yes they attend the same high school together.

Except a 16-year-old and 17-year-old in the same school consensually sending each other sexual videos of themselves isn't child pornography.

In Louisiana, the law states that anyone under the age of 17 found to be sexting any person of any age can be charged with a misdemeanor. It's not widely prosecuted. If a 17 year old, even if they are in high school together, does the very same thing, with a 16 year old, they can be charged with with child pornography. The law lacks the nuance it deserves and ultimately criminalizes common youth misbehavior between peers.

Now, this young man faces the prospect of having a criminal record and his mother is having to scrape together every single dime she can find, $4,000 already, just to defend him from these outrageous charges.

Charges should be dropped against this young man and his mother, a single mom of three, should be reimbursed for all of the needless expenses of this charade.

Beyond that, these laws must be adjusted to have nuance for normal sexual behaviors between two consenting 16 and 17-year-old kids.
 

LiveFreeX

Banned
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
513
Location
The Wacky Races
And it continues, soon it will be illegal to have heterosexual relations of any kind unless mandated by the state. Do you think they would have the same problem with two transLGBTs? I highly doubt it.

Then again, children that age should not be doing this, the whole country is in need of a reboot.
 

Yewki

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
598
So if a 16 year old sends nudes to a 17 year old, the 16 year old did not commit a crime.

But the 17 year old committed a crime, because he had the nudes sent from the 16 year old on his phone.

Seems legit.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,124
Reaction score
5,751
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
So if a 16 year old sends nudes to a 17 year old, the 16 year old did not commit a crime.

But the 17 year old committed a crime, because he had the nudes sent from the 16 year old on his phone.

Seems legit.
The 16 y/o likely did commit a crime, but would have to be charged as a juvenile, which isn't going to happen.
 

Men frequently err by talking too much. They often monopolize conversations, droning on and on about topics that bore women to tears. They think they're impressing the women when, in reality, they're depressing the women.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,766
Reaction score
1,235
Location
The Dirty South
While I do agree with the fact that men are being screwed over regarding this thing, we also need to perhaps convince our kids not to be sexting. Just sayin'. Nothing good can come of it. Not sure why people like to leave a record of themselves doing stupid sh*t. A record that will NEVER disappear.
 

LiveFreeX

Banned
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
513
Location
The Wacky Races
Our kids should be going to boys schools and at 18 sent off to 3rd world countries to attend university with women who are open to regular marriages and babies.
 

Yewki

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
598
The 16 y/o likely did commit a crime, but would have to be charged as a juvenile, which isn't going to happen.
Morale of the story, if you're 16 or younger in Lousiana and don't like someone who is 17+... send them nudes. Now they're f*cked.
 

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
This is the unedited version of the story.

KING: 17-year-old black boy sexting with 16-year-old white girl and guess who’s charged with child pornography

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...girl-ends-child-porn-charge-article-1.2617742

Levar Allen is a 17-year-old standout three-sport student athlete at Parkway High School in south Bossier City, La.

An award-winning wrestler, football and basketball player, Levar is beloved at school and in the community. He's never been in trouble with the law a day in his life — until now.

Levar did what millions of kids in America are doing — he exchanged naked text messages with a 16-year-old classmate.

First, she sent Levar a nude video and then he sent her one in return. Call it gross, but a recent study found that 54% of kids under the age of 18 have done so before.

Parents may hate it, but when it's consensual, it's definitely safer than in-person intercourse.

But Levar lives in the deep South. He's black. And it appears his biggest mistake wasn't doing what the majority of American teens have done. His biggest mistake was doing so with a white girl.

Her parents called the police when they discovered what was happening. Of course, they arrested Levar and he was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography for the video he still had of her on his phone.

Yes, she's 16 and he's 17.

Yes, she sent him a video first.

Yes, this was consensual.

Yes they attend the same high school together.

Yes, this is a bogus symptom of the mass criminalization of black folk in the New Jim Crow.

When pressed on whether or not race played a role, Lt. Bill Davis, who is also white, seemed offended and told KSLA-TV, "I have nothing to say about that. It doesn't matter what your race, what your religion, what your ethnicity, don't do child pornography! Plain and simple."

Except a 16-year-old and 17-year-old in the same school consensually sending each other sexual videos of themselves isn't child pornography.

In Louisiana, the law states that anyone under the age of 17 found to be sexting any person of any age can be charged with a misdemeanor. It's not widely prosecuted. If a 17 year old, even if they are in high school together, does the very same thing, with a 16 year old, they can be charged with with child pornography. The law lacks the nuance it deserves and ultimately criminalizes common youth misbehavior between peers.

Now, this young man faces the prospect of having a criminal record and his mother is having to scrape together every single dime she can find, $4,000 already, just to defend him from these outrageous charges.

Of course race has everything to do with Levar Allen being charged with these trumped-up crimes. Millions upon millions of teenagers are doing this very thing and he was selectively targeted among them, and made an example of, because he crossed a line that clearly irritated not only her white parents but white law enforcement officers as well.

Charges should be dropped against this young man and his mother, a single mom of three, should be reimbursed for all of the needless expenses of this charade.

Beyond that, these laws must be adjusted to have nuance for normal sexual behaviors between two consenting 16 and 17-year-old kids.
 

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
While I disagree with the charge, claiming it is racism is absolutely fvcking stupid.
100% agree. What is up with the LEFT today with their proclamations of every damn thing being racism?

- A black person doesn't get waited on in a store fast enough...racism!

- A black person gets cut off on the road....racism!

- A white person rejects a black person for a date....racism!

- Reject any of Obama's policies.....racism!

I'm lost here, can someone tell me what's NOT racist today o_O? The god damn word is used so often today that it's LOST it's true/original meaning and display, such as the display of what black people went through during 1942.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,766
Reaction score
1,235
Location
The Dirty South
100% agree. What is up with the LEFT today with their proclamations of every damn thing being racism?

- A black person doesn't get waited on in a store fast enough...racism!

- A black person gets cut off on the road....racism!

- A white person rejects a black person for a date....racism!

- Reject any of Obama's policies.....racism!

I'm lost here, can someone tell me what's NOT racist today o_O? The god damn word is used so often today that it's LOST it's true/original meaning and display, such as the display of what black people went through during 1942.
I have lost some life-long black friends over this. The minute I see someone play the victim card, I lose a little respect for them. I guess it depends on what else is going on in their lives as to whether it can be made up. But I'll say this.....it's probably hard for black people NOT to play the race card.....it's literally EVERYWHERE and so easy to do. Coming from all directions and if you don't tow the line, you're shamed relentlessly. I still remember when Maximum Less called you a "b*tch ass n*gga" a year or so ago.

But don't think that there aren't plenty of jealous white lib-tards out there that aren't fueling the victim mentality too.
 

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
it's probably hard for black people NOT to play the race card.....it's literally EVERYWHERE and so easy to do
Show me a white person complaining about black people playing the "race card," I'll show you a racist white supremacist. Racist white supremacists have playing the race card in America since Bacon's Rebellion.

I still remember when Maximum Less called you a "b*tch ass n*gga" a year or so ago.
I remember you singing the praises of apartheid South Africa and calling black people a gutter race.
 
Last edited:

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
Show me a white person complaining about black people playing the "race card," I'll show you a racist white supremacist.
You see how these Far Left people operate? They set it up to where no matter what you do, you are still a racist. They have it setup now to where if you call out the Ray Ray and Pookie black thugs in Chicago and Detroit, who are shooting up the damn neighborhood night in and night out, then you are a RACIST because how dare you call Ray Ray and Pookie a "thug"?

- Damn how many lives Ray Ray and Pookie take!

- Damn how much drugs Ray Ray and Pookie push to their own damn people!

- Damn how many babies Ray Ray and Pookie create that they don't Father/Parent/Provide For!

- Damn all that! You a racist for calling Ray Ray and Pookie a thug!

They care more about trying to identify WTF is "racist", than eliminating the REAL cancer in the black community, which is that of Ray Ray, Pookie and Tyquesha.
 
Last edited:

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
....But I'll say this.....it's probably hard for black people NOT to play the race card.....it's literally EVERYWHERE
Speed Dawg let me be honest with you, we are not dealing with MLK's or Malcolm X's black community. This is Lil Wayne and Beyonce's black community, otherwise known as Operation Ratchet and it's spread out across America in just about EVERY predominate BLACK neighborhood and area. Operation Ratchet:

- Worships thugs and welfare queens
- Hates standard education
- Worships drug dealers and ratchet women
- Worships "Jeeeesssussss" and (insert whatever pulpit pimpin pastor's name here)

- The 1st of the month is like Christmas because the welfare/EBT deposits are coming in

- Most are broke during the last week of the month and trying to hold on until the 1st hits

- Fighting and Trapping > Becoming educated, working hard, and starting a business

The cause of EVERY ratchet, hood, and thug's problem is that of a WHITE MAN in the bushes with a remote control who pushes button X, button Y and button Z to make all of the chaos happen in the black community. They call that the "white supremacy".

- The cause is NOT the thugs who sell dope, kill, steal, rob, and rape people in the community

- The cause is NOT black women who worship, glorify, and sleep with these thugs, rejecting any black man that doesn't have some "thug in him"

- The cause is NOT black women who make kids by these thugs and suck up more welfare

Listen, I've just come to terms that I'm never going to fit in with the new black community (Operation Ratchet). So that's why I'm going to keep my a.ss over here in these suburbs and away from these wild animals.
 
Top