Trump REALLY stepped on his Jane this time!

Tictac

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
1,256
Location
North America, probably an airport
I'm advocating my stance on the issue.

You don't have to like it.
Another excellent non-sequitur! You running for office or something?

You really need to learn how to separate yourself from identity politics. If you want to accuse and insult people that don't think like you and being "insanely insane" and telling them what they think, you really should read what they say first.
 

logicallefty

Moderator
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
6,055
Reaction score
5,237
Age
50
Location
Northeast Florida, USA
Ah, so women are the sole arbiter in deciding when life begins?

So if I punch a pregnant woman in the gut and kill her unborn baby, then I cannot be charged with murder?
This says everything for me right here regarding abortion and the beginning of life.
 

LiveFreeX

Banned
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
512
Location
The Wacky Races
Yep :) I agree with you, I mean they use it to control you... but at the same time pal, you gotta think of the kid. His mom might be a jerk but is that his fault? He didn't ask to come into this world, this way, right?

Its unfortunate and sick that women don't take the right of reproduction responsibly. Which... my body my choice is bullsh1t! Want to abort the kid? Pitch yourself off a bridge... it would be funny if it was 'his body, his choice' and the baby had a kill switch if he didn't like the life he was going to enter into, I'm betting women would act more responsibly. Just as I think that if there were strict laws surrounding abortion, people would be more apt to reconsider. What if any abortion carried up to a year in jail (for both parties), how many couples would be interested in pulling the trigger on that one? MEN and WOMEN would be much more careful about who they choose to sleep with.
 

LiveFreeX

Banned
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
512
Location
The Wacky Races
1. If men had the right to walk away, I think fewer women would have the kid.
2. Women eject men from the lives of children all of the time.
3. Again, only men are expected to think of the kid, as that is a weapon used by women against men.
1. Any man can walk before he choose to sink his d1ck into crazy.
2. Yep thats why men should not just look for bangs. This is reality and law in the West.
3. Disagree, only men are expected to think of the kid by a society that favors only women...

all of my posts lead to one.
 

amazingswayze

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
766
Reaction score
203
Location
New York, USA
Why are people pro-life? It's a woman's body and it's her right to choose. It's easy for you to say she should keep it but babies don't take care of themselves! Some people just can't afford it.

I'm convinced that the only reason politicians are pro-choice is because that child will eventually become a TAX-PAYING CITIZEN....

These guys have no heart. I wouldn't be surprised if it was their true motive.
 

LiveFreeX

Banned
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
512
Location
The Wacky Races
But hacking a baby into pieces is having heart?

Western Society.... where both men and women feel entitled to killing their children so as not to spoil their decadence.

Children cost less than a dollar a day, just ask anyone living in Africa.
Some people just can't afford it.
Some people should not be having sex then.
 

Tictac

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
1,256
Location
North America, probably an airport
Why are people pro-life? It's a woman's body and it's her right to choose. It's easy for you to say she should keep it but babies don't take care of themselves! Some people just can't afford it.

I'm convinced that the only reason politicians are pro-choice is because that child will eventually become a TAX-PAYING CITIZEN....

These guys have no heart. I wouldn't be surprised if it was their true motive.
Why do some people think of abortion as a means of birth control? There are other ways.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,080
Reaction score
5,712
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
The biggest abortion mill in the country is in Granite City, across the river from St Louis. I've had friends who went up there with their church to be abortion protestors. You can call them wacko religious nut jobs if you want to, but they have one very good point - a lot of abortions are about eliminating the evidence of a crime. Old men pull up with young teenage girls they have knocked up, and due to medical confidentiality rules, no questions are asked.

So if I fvck a 12 year-old and knock her up, should I be able to take her to the abortion mill so that no one finds out that I molested a kid?
 

backseatjuan

Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,463
Reaction score
1,657
Age
43
Location
Россия
Trump is a millionaire, he does not need support, he provides his own support. While other candidates need money to run, it's same as taking bribes in my opinion. If I could I'd vote Trump, because:

A: Trump pays for his own campaign
B: Trump is a businessman, he will use his experience to get the country out of debt
 

FairShake

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
2,426
Reaction score
307
Trump has indeed filed for bankruptcy four times.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ep/21/carly-fiorina/trumps-four-bankruptcies/

The idea that billionaire businessmen are good at running a country boggles my mind. They attempt to wrangle profit out for themselves, often at the extent of their workers.

Honestly that sounds like the Republican Party (and Hillary) already.

I really don't understand Trump supporters. Do you really hate Brown people so much that it warps your mind?
 

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,830
Reaction score
4,510
It's a real scary thought, that a group of politicians can decide what is and isn't allowed when it comes to another person's body.
Oh yes, it is really scary when politicians decide that you are not allowed to inject your body with drugs...or not wear a seatbelt or motorcycle helmet...or walk around naked in public. Oh, wait a second. You are not talking about any of those things. It's okay for politicians to decide what people can and cannot do with their bodies...as long as it does not involve killing unborn babies. When it involves killing unborn babies, it's "scary" when politicians prevent people from doing what they want with their bodies.

Personally, I don't have strong views on abortion one way or the other. However, I despise the intellectually dishonest attempts by the left to frame the issue with misleading terminology. First of all, there is no such thing as being "pro choice". The act of abortion affects two people. One of them does not get to make a choice. You are either pro-abortion or anti-abortion. Not "pro choice". Second, women who get abortions do not only "make decisions about their own bodies". If you want to argue that a woman's desire to avoid the physical and moral inconvenience of going through pregnancy trumps the unborn child's right to life, fine. But please skip the nauseating "choice" drivel.
 

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,830
Reaction score
4,510
The choice is the woman's. The unborn fetus has no choice. Nor should it.

We will never agree on this. Ever.

I just get tired of the "you're killing babies" crowd.

Ugh.
Just because you don't call it "killing babies" does not mean that you are not killing babies. Abortion is an act of terminating the life of an unborn fetus. That's not an opinion; that's a biological fact. No amount of politically correct phraseology will change that.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,766
Reaction score
1,235
Location
The Dirty South
I really don't understand Trump supporters. Do you really hate Brown people so much that it warps your mind?
No one hates brown people, Buzzword Boy.

I, for example, don't want hordes of lower intelligence people (whatever color, but statistics bear out that the darker the skin, the less average IQ) coming into this country and not contributing. But yet again, it's not their fault. It's the fault of liberal policies. I also don't want people getting jobs that they have not rightly earned due to affirmative action policies. Jobs are not created equal. I see the crap all the time about women making less money to do the same job.....that is as socialist as it can get. It's not about how you do the job, it's about what you can create with the job. Liberals want people to be mindless drones.

I really don't give 2 sh*ts about social issues. I want to get of most of the welfare overburden. Some is ok and necessary. But the people who take advantage must be made to learn a hard lesson, and the people in charge must be made to pay for their terrible decisions.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,080
Reaction score
5,712
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
statistics bear out that the darker the skin, the less average IQ

All hail the Ginger Super-Race!

I've read The Bell Curve. I know the studies you are talking about. That same book put the median Asian IQ at I think 102-104, slightly higher than the white IQ median of 100.

And regarding skin color, I've known Mexicans and Cubans who were whiter than me. White people who work in the sun get darker than brown people who don't.

Tests that are written by rich white people will be biased against anyone who is not a rich white person. I once had a law school prof from Manhattan. He was a rich, New York Jew, since we're being racist already. I got a C instead of an A on a test, a mid-term that was 50% of the class grade, because I didn't know what merchandise was sold at a tennis pro shop. The class was Agency & Partnership and had nothing to do with tennis. Funny thing, you don't find a lot of tennis pro shops in the trailer parks I grew up in. But in his little world, everyone was familiar with such a thing. If I had grown up as a rich Manhattanite, I would have gotten an A on that test.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,766
Reaction score
1,235
Location
The Dirty South
statistics bear out that the darker the skin, the less average IQ

All hail the Ginger Super-Race!

I've read The Bell Curve. I know the studies you are talking about. That same book put the median Asian IQ at I think 102-104, slightly higher than the white IQ median of 100.

And regarding skin color, I've known Mexicans and Cubans who were whiter than me. White people who work in the sun get darker than brown people who don't.

Tests that are written by rich white people will be biased against anyone who is not a rich white person. I once had a law school prof from Manhattan. He was a rich, New York Jew, since we're being racist already. I got a C instead of an A on a test, a mid-term that was 50% of the class grade, because I didn't know what merchandise was sold at a tennis pro shop. The class was Agency & Partnership and had nothing to do with tennis. Funny thing, you don't find a lot of tennis pro shops in the trailer parks I grew up in. But in his little world, everyone was familiar with such a thing. If I had grown up as a rich Manhattanite, I would have gotten an A on that test.
Don't even start, I was prepared for this sort of packaged response.

Look all over the world, bro. Civilizations are what they are. Who cares about a test, look at what has been accomplished. Big difference between Europe and Africa (before the global liberal agenda set in - remember, you have to build up to a point before liberal ideas can exist). And better yet, all races do bring some good to the table, and from I see, most races can intermix and assimilate and be just fine. But the darker the skin, the less that seems to happen.

Oh look! You called me racist, so cute!

Bottom line, over a couple thousand years of evolution, people who had to survive in colder temperatures had to find a way to flourish, and in so, build stuff. People in warmer temperatures did not, it was more of a nomadic way of life. I coined a saying a few months ago - you are only as tough as you have to be. I find it true. Maybe, in another 1,000 years, we will all be equal again, with similar IQs. But right now, in 2016, we have all quickly come together in this multi-cultural world and THERE ARE DIFFERENCES, whether you want to admit it not.

Now, continue with your heil se mein kampf shame-tastic attempts if you want, or talk about the real points.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,080
Reaction score
5,712
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
Why don't we have one's that non-whites are acing

You mean the Asians? They are obviously the Master Race if we are going to go by IQ tests.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,766
Reaction score
1,235
Location
The Dirty South
Why don't we have one's that non-whites are acing

You mean the Asians? They are obviously the Master Race if we are going to go by IQ tests.
Whoever said the Asians weren't smart? Seems to me they are doing just fine over there. You are simply deflecting.

Plus, no one is trying to stop any huge inflow of Asians. In all actuality, the brutality showed toward the Chinese in the 1800s and the Japanese during WW2 in America are huge racial black spots that never get mentioned. Instead, we are trying to pacify and pay reparation to the damned idiots like BLM. Why didn't the Asians ever need a huge struggle? It can't possibly be because they assimilated into American life and contributed on their own, can it??

Derp
 
Top