First it was "statistics" and now it's "macrolevel".
I personally think that when folks start using statistics or fancy words, they're hiding or trying to justify something.
Not sure what I'd be hiding. I answered every one of your questions. The stats are what they are. You're welcome to try and spin them, but I don't spin.
Why not just keep it simple and admit that you're a racist? I would actually respect you if you just admitted that, even though I abhor your racist views.
Because I'm not a racist, regardless of what you respect. I have never, NEVER, advocated judging anyone on a micro level by their skin color. By their culture and overall appearances? You're damn right I will judge them.
I doubt that you would ever voice your statistics or your "macrolevelism" face to face in a group of black people, as you've never even showed your face on this website.
Of course not, why would I? It would not accomplish anything. Why would I walk up to ANY group of people and purposely agitate them? Stop the shaming, man. Plus, you, I and they already know the reality that the statistics bear out. But for whatever reason, you choose to ignore this.
In 1968, a white man murdered Martin Luther King. So I guess in that year your macrolevel racist theory might well have been proved wrong.
Do you really believe this emotional drivel? Come on, man.
Look, pal. I have to deal with reality and numbers in my job. I can't afford to think with emotion. Traffic patterns is a good example. You cannot predict what one car will do on a given day. But traffic OVERALL is very, very predictable. That is the difference between micro and macro points of view. This is the reality. If you want to believe in fairy tales of diversity, my advice to you is to get out there and try to make a difference in the gang-ridden communities, and try and figure out why the family-unit has broken down, producing generations upon generations of criminals. Fighting the liberal race-bait war is for fools.