Forum restrictions towards topics relating to politics, religion, and race is absurd.

[Sprayarc]

I agree. I thought it was hilarious when those black people told off Sanders. If our resident socialist gets told off by them, there is no hope after all.

Black on black murders occur a lot more frequent. They happily obviate the fact, while pointing the finger at the "white devil". And why the need to run? Police are there to control & keep order. They also forget that, while victimizing the police officer for doing his job.

Once Obama is out of office, things should return to their natural state. Obama and his brilliant plan to tax the wealthy, helping illegals and giving freebies. God help us.

sEe

So if we are suggesting to make an other attempt, a good idea would be to have the mod simply removing an user from the conversation if he passes the limits (tell him to leave or get banned since I guess there are no selective bans) or certain conversation are given as a lawless sections.

Surely the best thing would be to have civilized people talking in a decent way but when the first name is called its just a matter of time...

but what if some one is posting misleading statistics or false information. Whether they believe it or not it should be considered trolling. This happened quite a lot in the past.

People will do this because they were indoctrinated so their feelings are very strong about what they believe, but they actually have no objective factual information or unbiased statistics.

This is what would usually trigger attacks. If some one chooses to ignore reality and live in a delusional fantasy land to protect their feelings.

 

[Jaylan]

 

[Who Dares Win]

sEe
but what if some one is posting misleading statistics or false information. Whether they believe it or not it should be considered trolling. This happened quite a lot in the past.

People will do this because they were indoctrinated so their feelings are very strong about what they believe, but they actually have no objective factual information or unbiased statistics.

This is what would usually trigger attacks. If some one chooses to ignore reality and live in a delusional fantasy land to protect their feelings.

If someone spread wrong or false information you provide the correct ones, Im sure the link providing fake or false information can be easily recognized as not reliable.

If someone calls you "racist" without providing anything in support of his theory or point you dont even have to reply cause he basically proved you right in front of everyone.

Same thing if someone calls you a crying liberal with no explanation or counterargument.

Best thing anyway would be to have selective bans for the mod which ban a user only from a section of the forum, plenty of forums I know let the political section accessible only to few users while the main ones are open to all.

 

[Sprayarc]

If someone spread wrong or false information you provide the correct ones, Im sure the link providing fake or false information can be easily recognized as not reliable.

If someone calls you "racist" without providing anything in support of his theory or point you dont even have to reply cause he basically proved you right in front of everyone.

Same thing if someone calls you a crying liberal with no explanation or counterargument.

Best thing anyway would be to have selective bans for the mod which ban a user only from a section of the forum, plenty of forums I know let the political section accessible only to few users while the main ones are open to all.

I mean you are right. But problem is our society is becoming more and more Orwellian and this is very dangerous. Look at the things that are passed off as truth but aren't actually true on college campus or even (much more of this on the far left spectrum of politics, but I don't claim to be a republican) or politicians.

But I guess its not right to censor regardless.