women are society's glue?

[Delta]

been thinking:

women encourage societal COHESION instead of dispersion.

because they value males who succeed WITHIN SOCIETY. there are lots of sayings like 'don't be a rat in the rat race or a dog in a dog eat dog world'.

the concept of 'high status' begs the question, "high status ... WHERE?"

answer: within society of course.

this is interesting cuz left to our own devices, i'm sure that there are lots of males who truly would say, "y'know, fvck this bullshyt... i'm outta here" and go off to the fvcking wilderness and make a life for themselves.

i mean why be categorized as an omega according to standards imposed by others?

and indeed, even with the pull of women, there are lots of guys that do more or less take themselves out of the rat race and say, 'i'm above it'.

alas, if it only wasn't for the fact that WITHDRAWING FROM SOCIETY makes a male a fvcking PARIAH to women!

being ENGAGED and seeking SUCCESS within society attracts. withdrawing and leaving repels.
--------------------------------------------------

so in a sociological/evolutionary (?) framing, women encourage societies to stick together - and this is probably an advantage for the species.

unfortunately, they also not only ENCOURAGE male on male conflict, they make it an absolute necessity!

and perhaps this is a cosmic advantage as well... the concept of DIALECTIC... that the clashing of diametric opposites creates something new.

but in a decidedly non-feminist perspective, they serve society by REALLY BEING OBJECTS!

there is much that is said on these boards that a man must be ACTIVE.... but under the current thought experiment, are women then PASSIVE, OBJECTS and heck... PRIZES?
--------------------------------------------------

and so, i submit that perhaps it is IMPOSSIBLE that society avoids being FEMINIZED... this is not in the sense with which it is most commonly brought up in this board but nonetheless, one way or another, it seems that in a very powerful way, women determine the actions of men... passively to boot!

not a feminist idea but certainly powerful dontcha think?

delta

 

[sexual_intellectual]

I like this post and I think you're right. Nice one.

 

[squirrels]

Originally posted by Delta


societal COHESION instead of dispersion.

the concept of 'high status'categorized as an omega according to standards imposed by others?
a fvcking PARIAH to women!

being ENGAGED and seeking SUCCESS within society attracts. withdrawing and leaving repels.
--------------------------------------------------

so in a sociological/evolutionary (?) framing

a cosmic advantage as well... the concept of DIALECTIC... that the clashing of diametric opposites

and so, i submit that

Yup...someone needs to get laid.

 

[Delta]

maaaaan,

you ain't kiddin'. afc and how - but workin' on it.

but as i said before: omega males diddlin' themselves with four fingers for millions of years and then boom - opposable thumb baby.



delta

 

[Fender]

Well, dumping all my male pride and DJ-ness, Females actualli do have a upper hand in nature. Female spiders eat off the heads of males when they finished fuking, some animals dont HAVE males, etc.

SO your idea that society will be feminised might seem like a good prediction. In fact, i think it society will almost definately be feminised. But every society has a leader...and guess how feminine the LEADER will be? Not very!
Guess who will have the most sex??? The more MASCULINE one.

So fellow DJ's, it is time to embrace. While the rest of society becomes de-testosteroned, we will be rising as MEN to LEAD humankind to the next era!

-The optimistic one

 

[Climax]

Re: Re: women are society's glue?

Originally posted by squirrels
Yup...someone needs to get laid.

lol..

 

[dietzcoi]

Good post

Unfortunately men are just as bad, going after the high-status HBs. We encourage women to be the way they are.

If Omega men and Omega women would stop chasing the so-called alpha men and women, think about what would happen.. the alphas would lose thier status

Won't ever happen.. it is against our nature as societal beings.

BTW many many men have said fukk it throughout history and headed off to the wilderness.

Dietzcoi

 

[Ice Cold]

Hehe... fun stuff. It's interesting to analyze it like this.

Consider this too:

If you're alpha (the way Delta speaks of it), then all the chicks are available to you... yet the society demands you to choose only one of them.

This makes alpha marrying a single chick unnatural. He'll cheat just because he can. She'll either be smart enough to accept it, or will divorce him.

If you're beta, then you don't have a choice of chicks and may only find one who's gonna agree to marry you. And the wife is always gonna be tempted to cheat, and probably will. The beta even may end up raising a cuckoo son.

 

[No Escape]

Originally posted by Delta
been thinking:

women encourage societal COHESION instead of dispersion.

because they value males who succeed WITHIN SOCIETY. there are lots of sayings like 'don't be a rat in the rat race or a dog in a dog eat dog world'.

the concept of 'high status' begs the question, "high status ... WHERE?"

answer: within society of course.

this is interesting cuz left to our own devices, i'm sure that there are lots of males who truly would say, "y'know, fvck this bullshyt... i'm outta here" and go off to the fvcking wilderness and make a life for themselves.

i mean why be categorized as an omega according to standards imposed by others?

and indeed, even with the pull of women, there are lots of guys that do more or less take themselves out of the rat race and say, 'i'm above it'.

alas, if it only wasn't for the fact that WITHDRAWING FROM SOCIETY makes a male a fvcking PARIAH to women!

being ENGAGED and seeking SUCCESS within society attracts. withdrawing and leaving repels.
--------------------------------------------------

so in a sociological/evolutionary (?) framing, women encourage societies to stick together - and this is probably an advantage for the species.

unfortunately, they also not only ENCOURAGE male on male conflict, they make it an absolute necessity!

and perhaps this is a cosmic advantage as well... the concept of DIALECTIC... that the clashing of diametric opposites creates something new.

but in a decidedly non-feminist perspective, they serve society by REALLY BEING OBJECTS!

there is much that is said on these boards that a man must be ACTIVE.... but under the current thought experiment, are women then PASSIVE, OBJECTS and heck... PRIZES?
--------------------------------------------------

and so, i submit that perhaps it is IMPOSSIBLE that society avoids being FEMINIZED... this is not in the sense with which it is most commonly brought up in this board but nonetheless, one way or another, it seems that in a very powerful way, women determine the actions of men... passively to boot!

not a feminist idea but certainly powerful dontcha think?

delta

I'm still trying to determine if most women really go for money or not. I see and hear of a lot of women(especially hot women) dating guys who don't have money..but then i hear a lot go for money. All i've got to say is this....for the women that do go for status and money, they're shallow, and deserve sh*t...i wish them the worst in life. For the ones who are sincere and down to earth, may good things fall upon them.

 

[Delta]

that's not really fair though.

i felt that way too but i see the hypocrisy more clearly these days.

i am turned on by chicks with porn star, super model, lingerie model looks. big tits, slender waist, a mouth that exists to suck ****, legs that soar to the heavens and an a$$ that seems to lunge for your privates.

does that make me shallow?

most fat ugly chicks would say yes.
-----------------------------------------------------

money is a PARTICULAR KIND OF STRENGTH.

the lack of it it CAN be overcome by OVERWHELMING good looks, great fame, talent, etc.

and of course, just as i am also turned on by that particular girl next door who is perhaps not my porn startlet ideal, i am sure that women have a degree of variability and personal taste involved.

rail against it as you will, but it should be acknowledged that the 'ideal' patterns exist in our sexual minds (women AND men) nonetheless.

delta

 

[Tha Realnezz]

Look at where family values & marriage are since women's lib.

I think it's safe to say after 40 years of the "Independant woman" that they belong in the kitchen.

 

[00Kevin]

Originally posted by Tha Realnezz
Look at where family values & marriage are since women's lib.

I think it's safe to say after 40 years of the "Independant woman" that they belong in the kitchen.

lol.. there is no such thing as the "Independant woman".

Women are now slaves to their jobs, they don't have time to be mothers to their childern, they can't have as many childern, and one income isn't enough to support a family. Are they really that independant? NO, they still need a man and a cheque from the goverment.

A woman with 5 kids in todays world would fair just as poorly as a woman with 5 kids 60 years ago.

This reminds me.
A few women at work started to complain and wonder why guys don't hold the door open for them. I patted one of them on the head and said, "oh i'll open the door for ya. Just cook me some thing good ok." Everyone thought it was really funny. even the women.