This is an interesting article about a woman that has "gone her way" and will intend remaining single through the rest of her life. She's in her early 40s. The author works for Chanel and is quite, quite successful in life. A go getter.
Anyhow, she wrote an article, "Why I'm Not Marriage Material" that reflects upon her previous marriage. She was a pregnant teen in high school and mentions since that she's lived in a small town that she likely didn't become student body president like her sister because of her teen pregnancy. At least that's what I think she's implying.
Anyway, I think this was a defining moment in her life to get passed that fishbowl community and leave town to go on to greater things. She was married young, like 19 or 20, possibly shotgun wedding? By the time she was 30-ish, she realized she was no longer the same person and her husband and herself went separate ways.
There was no cheating, monkey branching, looking for the BBD on her part, her and her husband weren't the same people they were when they were kids.
Now there are certain exerpts of the why's and how she thinks she's not marriage material. And though companionship is great...it's only temporary and eventually she'll feel stifled...
I love companionship, but I’ve also come to realize how happy I am when I’m single. Many people marry because they’re scared of the prospect of being alone. But I’ve accumulated evidence of my levels of happiness with and without a partner. Turns out, I’m pretty darn happy with both, but when a relationship starts to deteriorate, I get very unhappy. When I’m single, I might occasionally yearn for companionship, but my happiness levels are off the charts.
Usually when I read articles like this, there are stand-out portions of the article that makes me think they are just making excuses for their failed relationships, esp. if there was no cheating, abuse, drug/
alcohol
It seems to be an excuse she made for the ol' "we grew apart" situation. A cop-out.
Is she saying she's "not marriage material" because she has commitment issues?
If you think about it, the article seems to reflect what a lot of posters have said about women, and in fact it's actually being told BY a woman as most would probably nod at some portions of her article.
But by publishing the article in TIME does it somehow give her an "out" when it comes to her failed marriage? Or was the marriage even considered a failure in her eyes or is she trying to rationalize her inability to commit to the long term?
Anyhow, she wrote an article, "Why I'm Not Marriage Material" that reflects upon her previous marriage. She was a pregnant teen in high school and mentions since that she's lived in a small town that she likely didn't become student body president like her sister because of her teen pregnancy. At least that's what I think she's implying.
Anyway, I think this was a defining moment in her life to get passed that fishbowl community and leave town to go on to greater things. She was married young, like 19 or 20, possibly shotgun wedding? By the time she was 30-ish, she realized she was no longer the same person and her husband and herself went separate ways.
There was no cheating, monkey branching, looking for the BBD on her part, her and her husband weren't the same people they were when they were kids.
Now there are certain exerpts of the why's and how she thinks she's not marriage material. And though companionship is great...it's only temporary and eventually she'll feel stifled...
I love companionship, but I’ve also come to realize how happy I am when I’m single. Many people marry because they’re scared of the prospect of being alone. But I’ve accumulated evidence of my levels of happiness with and without a partner. Turns out, I’m pretty darn happy with both, but when a relationship starts to deteriorate, I get very unhappy. When I’m single, I might occasionally yearn for companionship, but my happiness levels are off the charts.
Usually when I read articles like this, there are stand-out portions of the article that makes me think they are just making excuses for their failed relationships, esp. if there was no cheating, abuse, drug/
alcohol
It seems to be an excuse she made for the ol' "we grew apart" situation. A cop-out.
Is she saying she's "not marriage material" because she has commitment issues?
If you think about it, the article seems to reflect what a lot of posters have said about women, and in fact it's actually being told BY a woman as most would probably nod at some portions of her article.
But by publishing the article in TIME does it somehow give her an "out" when it comes to her failed marriage? Or was the marriage even considered a failure in her eyes or is she trying to rationalize her inability to commit to the long term?