Transform Your Dating Life in Minutes

If you're looking for a proven system to attract women and achieve dating success, you're in the right place.

Our step-by-step guide is the perfect starting point for any man looking to improve his dating life.

With our expert advice and strategies, you'll be able to overcome common obstacles, build confidence, and start attracting the women you desire.

Thanks for joining us, and I wish you all the best on your path to success!

Where did the FDA get the idea that everyone is eating too much protein?

spesmilitis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,509
Reaction score
6
According to some govt recommendation (I think RDA) everyone is eating too much protein. I think the guide states that something like .36 grams/lbs will cover everyone needs and then some. Does anyone know what this based off of??? I need to know this and figure out why its wrong to convince some protein-phobes to eat more protein. I have a friend who has a bad case of skinny fatness.

I have a feeling that maybe cheaps fast food meats encourage ketosis or maybe it has some ketones in it.
 

Kerpal

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
41
They have charts at my school gym that say that strength athletes need more protein than sedentary people, and underneath there's a little chart. The chart says we need ~65 grams of protein a day; not only that but they don't even take weight into account, that 65 grams applies to all strength athletes :rolleyes:

I've noticed that the "mainstream" is usually way behind though. They're always coming out with new, groundbreaking studies that experienced athletes look at and say "Uh, we've known that for decades now".
 

blinkwatt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
7
Age
37
From what I know the FDA has said that 60 grams of protein a day is enough.

I have (powerlifter) friends who have grown off of 60 grams a day,although they never took lifting too serious. I think the concern is that a prolonged excessive
protein intake can cause calcium problems when you are older.
 

Warboss Alex

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
4,174
Reaction score
30
problems will occur without dietary or supplementary calcium as protein can inhibit calcium absorption.

and anyone who grows off 60g protein a day is surely gifted.

the FDA remember is based on the bare needs (the bare essential needs, not the optimal amounts) of sedentary adults, no studies have been made on muscular, hard-training individuals as they are too low a population sample to warrant any sort of research.
 

spesmilitis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,509
Reaction score
6
Kerpal said:
I've noticed that the "mainstream" is usually way behind though. They're always coming out with new, groundbreaking studies that experienced athletes look at and say "Uh, we've known that for decades now".
They just found out that milk is better than gaterade for post work out since milk has protein.
 

Kerpal

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
41
^ I actually just made a post about that and a lot of people here don't agree with it.
 

mrRuckus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,442
Reaction score
87
spesmilitis said:
They just found out that milk is better than gaterade for post work out since milk has protein.
Better than JUST gatorade? yeah.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
38
spesmilitis said:
According to some govt recommendation (I think RDA)
RDA is not a government agency, it is a recommendation put out by a government agency. As all government functions it has been accused of political manipulation. Many people believe the Dept. of Agriculture and the farm interests they represent tend to sway the RDA guidelines.
 

Throttle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,837
Reaction score
11
wrong government conspiracy. if anything, the balance of lobbying interests in US ag would inflate the protein intake rec's.

it's much simpler. the protein target goes back to World War II, and was a bare minimum established during wartime rationing in the US. it was established inductively (how much are people eating?--take the bare minimum of that and call it sufficient!) with little deductive scientific justification (actually most of our health marker guidelines were established this way). if anything, the meat & related lobbies have consistently failed to raise the rec.
 
Top