This would be a tip but I'm not going to fill out all the "how to" information in here because I can't give a damn, I'm tired. This is just an idea I feel like throwing up.
I was thinking about all this seduction material I've read, trying to work out what brings it all together. I mean, David DeAngelo's methods are completely different from Gunwitch which is frankly the opposite of the Mystery Method, blah blah. Wierd huh?
I've come to the conclusion that there are three main "spheres" which all material on seduction broadly fits into.
1. The manipulation of the Validation Dynamic.
Validation is something which everyone wants but which is often uncomfortable or unimportant when we have it. It's a paradox. Giving away too much validation results in contempt. To put it another way, it's how much you give of "yourself". Compliments and sucking up are saying, "yep, here I am, you have me". Negs etc are saying the opposite: anti-validation. This sphere of seduction involves making them want your validation, teasing with it and using it to create strong feelings. Examples include negs, "freeze-outs", C&F, push and pull, etc. David DeAngelo's stuff has the best understanding of this. It's like leaning back and letting them come into your space. Chase and they will run.
2. Masculinity/Status.
As exemplified by Pook, Krassus and the general DJ-philosophy. (DeAngelo too to an extent).
Pook explained it awesomely, I would strongly recommend you read the Book Of Pook as available in my signature ^_^; Pook said, women want worlds. Someone with passion and a purpose. A musician, artist, author, stand up comedian, businessman - they all have a world of their own that gives them a reason to live. There's a reason that girls like rockstars. It's a sort of power, inner energy -- that's masculinity.
Magic tricks, social savvy - "demonstrating value" - is a small scale version of this which PUAs use.
3. Sexuality. (the gunwitch method, Pook).
Women like sex just like men like sex, and if you get them in the mood - if they see you as a sexual being, assosiate you with sex - they will **** you. Hell, you'd do the same thing. (Ideas about sluthood and your undesirability notwithstanding, of course).
I was thinking about all this seduction material I've read, trying to work out what brings it all together. I mean, David DeAngelo's methods are completely different from Gunwitch which is frankly the opposite of the Mystery Method, blah blah. Wierd huh?
I've come to the conclusion that there are three main "spheres" which all material on seduction broadly fits into.
1. The manipulation of the Validation Dynamic.
Validation is something which everyone wants but which is often uncomfortable or unimportant when we have it. It's a paradox. Giving away too much validation results in contempt. To put it another way, it's how much you give of "yourself". Compliments and sucking up are saying, "yep, here I am, you have me". Negs etc are saying the opposite: anti-validation. This sphere of seduction involves making them want your validation, teasing with it and using it to create strong feelings. Examples include negs, "freeze-outs", C&F, push and pull, etc. David DeAngelo's stuff has the best understanding of this. It's like leaning back and letting them come into your space. Chase and they will run.
2. Masculinity/Status.
As exemplified by Pook, Krassus and the general DJ-philosophy. (DeAngelo too to an extent).
Pook explained it awesomely, I would strongly recommend you read the Book Of Pook as available in my signature ^_^; Pook said, women want worlds. Someone with passion and a purpose. A musician, artist, author, stand up comedian, businessman - they all have a world of their own that gives them a reason to live. There's a reason that girls like rockstars. It's a sort of power, inner energy -- that's masculinity.
Magic tricks, social savvy - "demonstrating value" - is a small scale version of this which PUAs use.
3. Sexuality. (the gunwitch method, Pook).
Women like sex just like men like sex, and if you get them in the mood - if they see you as a sexual being, assosiate you with sex - they will **** you. Hell, you'd do the same thing. (Ideas about sluthood and your undesirability notwithstanding, of course).
