looks like i'm not..
this chick:
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=193430
i text her last night to set up a date for this weekend:
me: hey there HB, let's get together this weekend for those croissants, i got a couple things on but i have some free time on Sat or Sunday at 4pm, how's then?
this afternoon:
her: Hiii sure saturday seems fine..shall we meet up around 4? please send me the address
so far so good..
me 3 hours later:
me: yes, meet me at x place train station tomorrow at 4pm, i'll take us there it's only 5 mins walk. see you then. x
3 hours later:
her: can we make it 5.30??
45 mins later (at 8.45pm)..
me: yeah, in fact 5.30pm would be better for me. i look forward to seeing your sexy raven haired self tomorrow. x
(prob wasn't ideal for me to be agreeing to her time but i thought i was overthinking it and 5.30 was better for me anyhow)
2mins later:
her: sexy? i dont think that's appropriate to say
20mins later
me: i stand by the statement. i only speak the truth so it must be true
my thoughts were 'goddamnit.. i overcomplicated things again.' but then i thought if she cant take playful flirting then clearly she had me friendzoned and didn't see me as a date, right?
she is foreign so may take the word 'sexy' as offensive esp coming from a relatively conservative country and religion so there might be some lost in translation issues, but at the end of the day if she liked me she wouldn't care.
what would have been a better response than what i said above? i may be overanalyzing but i felt if i took it back or apologised i'd look weak, im a man i should stand by what i say. although i think i may be applying the theory wrong.
tbh i dont think we're meeting tomorrow, i guess i'll show up stay 5 mins then leave. thing is i dont want to look like i got stood up so i'll prob go inside the station and pretend to look at the train map. not calling her to see where she is. if she wants to see me that's her choice.
this chick:
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=193430
i text her last night to set up a date for this weekend:
me: hey there HB, let's get together this weekend for those croissants, i got a couple things on but i have some free time on Sat or Sunday at 4pm, how's then?
this afternoon:
her: Hiii sure saturday seems fine..shall we meet up around 4? please send me the address
so far so good..
me 3 hours later:
me: yes, meet me at x place train station tomorrow at 4pm, i'll take us there it's only 5 mins walk. see you then. x
3 hours later:
her: can we make it 5.30??
45 mins later (at 8.45pm)..
me: yeah, in fact 5.30pm would be better for me. i look forward to seeing your sexy raven haired self tomorrow. x
(prob wasn't ideal for me to be agreeing to her time but i thought i was overthinking it and 5.30 was better for me anyhow)
2mins later:
her: sexy? i dont think that's appropriate to say
20mins later
me: i stand by the statement. i only speak the truth so it must be true
my thoughts were 'goddamnit.. i overcomplicated things again.' but then i thought if she cant take playful flirting then clearly she had me friendzoned and didn't see me as a date, right?
she is foreign so may take the word 'sexy' as offensive esp coming from a relatively conservative country and religion so there might be some lost in translation issues, but at the end of the day if she liked me she wouldn't care.
what would have been a better response than what i said above? i may be overanalyzing but i felt if i took it back or apologised i'd look weak, im a man i should stand by what i say. although i think i may be applying the theory wrong.
tbh i dont think we're meeting tomorrow, i guess i'll show up stay 5 mins then leave. thing is i dont want to look like i got stood up so i'll prob go inside the station and pretend to look at the train map. not calling her to see where she is. if she wants to see me that's her choice.