We are Screwed

[logicallefty]

Men kept control of women, for the most part, from the start of time.

We gave them more freedoms, rights, powers, etc.

Now we are screwed. We are absolutely screwed. They have too much now and there will be no going back.

About the only way I see it changing is if

1) is if ALL men in the world, 100%, stood together and said "no more, we are taking control back". There aren't enough of us red pill men for this to happen. We would always be outnumbered by h0rney AFCs and white knights

2) the human race was wiped out and given a chance to start over from scratch


Why do I write this? I am sitting looking around me and women are ruining everything, that's why. I watch it everyday and there is nothing I can do to stop it.

We are screwed.

 

[jurry]

Heeere we go again..

 

[logicallefty]

Heeere we go again..

A little good news.. Lucky for you Sir, women haven't taken away our freedoms on the Internet, not yet anyway. So if you don't like this topic you are free to browse other threads and ignore this one. :flowers:

 

[Serenity]

Hahaha, they aren't ruining things. They're having fun, you should try it some time. Take control back? You've lost it, they never took it.

 

[MOTU]

I am with Espi on this one. I can't imagine what it was like in Victorian England when premarital or extra marital sex was punishable by prison and chicks when around covered head to toe. No thanks. Sh!t these days even going to the grocery store provides some visual entertainment. Nothing like a Texas girl in her short shorts and cowboy boots giving you a sly little look when she sees you notice her....

So I'll take the bad with the good. We're only screwed if we don't understand that the rules have changed and don't take full advantage of our current situation.

 

[Tictac]

Welcome to the 21st century.

When was the last time you remember a genie crawling back into a bottle?

 

[Bible_Belt]

Beyond women, you could make a list of other ways in which we are screwed, from climate change, to currency/government collapse, to the corporatizaion of food supply fvcking everyone's health. The world is falling apart in a lot of different ways.

But there's no need to obsess about any one societal issue. It's not fun. Guys who get over it and move on tend to be the ones who get laid. Obsessing about things you can't change repels women.

 

[Between_The_Lines]

We've been uprooted, not screwed, and we have the tools right here on this very forum to make it 'home' again. Don't lose hope - adapt.

 

[_sideways_]

A little good news.. Lucky for you Sir, women haven't taken away our freedoms on the Internet, not yet anyway. So if you don't like this topic you are free to browse other threads and ignore this one. :flowers:

You gave him flowers lmao....

 

[Shivastorm_88]

I cringe so hard when I read about 95% of the misogynistic threads on here, and threads like these are the worse of all.

O/P, let me ask you something. Do you have a smart phone? A tablet? Two computers, maybe? One or two video game console? How about a large T.V.?

Do you partake in the daily ritual of over consumption, i.e.: drink a coffee a day from a local coffee store, buy your meal at work, go for drinks on a regular basis, etc.?

Are you actually able to put money on the side in the form of savings, while still living comfortably, and able to enjoy your life and doing things you love?

All this. All of this, you can kiss goodbye if you take women off the workforce. Women are what keeps capitalism alive.

No, I'm not being feminist by saying this, it's simply a fact. Remove half of the global workforce, and you can kiss capitalism goodbye. Global collapse.

IF women had never entered the workforce, I'm going into speculative fiction here, it's very well possible the US of A would not have been able to help with the war, or maybe they would have, but then maybe they would not have been able to be the economic machine they became to drive the USSR to its collapse.

IF women had left the workforce post-war, our society, technologically speaking, would not nearly be as advanced as it is right now.

And FYI, same thing would happen if you take men off the workforce. I'm simply illustrating a point. If you actually took the time to educate yourself instead of whining, maybe you wouldn't be posting a completely and utterly idiotic thread. If you actually took the time to work on yourself and become the best you possibly could, constantly thriving to better yourself, maybe you wouldn't be in a situation where you would have something to whine about.

Good day sir.

 

[Bingo-Player]

i posted something similar to this about a month ago addressing the issues of empowering women both on social media and in the workforce

if people here want to carry on burying they're heads in the sand then fine come back here when you can see the problem

because there is a problem a BIG PROBLEM

marriages aren't lasting , and for my generation they aren't even beginning

when the game first emerged publicly around 10 - 15 years ago it brought a lot of men level with a womans social skills in some cases even beyond

however in 15 years the game hasn't changed but the world has , the game as we know it was never designed to be able to cope with reality tv and social media

it was never anticipated a woman would be able to turn her mobile phone into a fully functioning weapon of mass seduction


it was never anticipated a womans game would ever get any stronger than it was , BUT IT HAS

a chick i follow tweeted earlier

"why is it when you don't text a guy back they're brain literally melts ......LOL'

it really is worrying

we need a revolution and quickly

 

[jurry]

I see it exactly opposite bingo player. Prior to this point the ego ran supreme and men could not handle the idea of a "freed woman". Now that is beginning to reverse itself and we have a culling of the weak, a culling of the beta if you will.

The ego centered, desperate beta (whose brain is melting when he doesnt get a text back) wont survive or reproduce in these circumstances.. Whereas before he had the societal leverage to force a woman to be with him, she needed him for security, financial support, etc. This is bizarrely considered alpha behavior by many here.

You lament the death of marriage or that it isnt even beginning, I celebrate it. Why hold on to this absurd idea of two people clinging to each other and hacking it out for 50 years. Its so damn depressing. Sure if you find that perfect person why not go for it if you both want it, but it need not be the norm.

On to the new earth, the rise of the true alpha who is not dependant on a woman for his happiness, and gets woman for this very reason.

 

[Peaks&Valleys]

"why is it when you don't text a guy back they're brain literally melts ......LOL'

Well, if YOU want to START doing something about it, then you can STOP "following" chicks like this^.

 

[logicallefty]

Great thread so far fellas, thank you for all replies. I'd like to ask a couple of questions for all to answer:

1) Do you personally know any women in any positions/roles in life where, IN YOUR OPINION, they are not qualified to be? YES? or NO?

2) If your answer to #1 is YES, how did they get there?


Now I will answer my own questions:

1) Yes, many. I work with a good chunk of women in IT who have no technical skills and can't even put IT components together in a logical black box/flow chart manor if given a pen and paper. Not only do they NOT know how how stuff works in detail, but they can't even explain it in "Readers Digest" format, yet the "manage" and "are in charge" of it.

2) Rather than get removed all together when they can't cut it in the technical trenches, in IT, women like this often get promoted to MANAGE the technical staff doing the things they they do not have a clue about. The people who promote them are either other unqualified women who are in positions to do so, or white knight men who either get scammed by the woman's true background and skills, or they think in the back of their mind that it's the "gentlemanly" thing to do or perhaps that it may score them pv$$y if they do a good deed for this woman. IT is a field of logic, but once this happens, operations change to emotions from said woman in charge, and everything goes to sh|t for all parties.

Anyone else?

 

[Masculinity]

Equal pay for equal work!!

Do you wanna know why women don't make as much as men?

Because on the off chance me and her are together on the Titanic and that mofo starts to go down, she gets to leave with the kids and I have to stay.

In a hostage situation, who gets negotiated for first? Women and kids.

.......

What about me? I wanna go too.

Are you going to plagiarize the whole thing or only part of Bill Burr's comedy?

Here, at 2:50: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZxOdLRihlA

 

[Between_The_Lines]

Great thread so far fellas, thank you for all replies. I'd like to ask a couple of questions for all to answer:

1) Do you personally know any women in any positions/roles in life where, IN YOUR OPINION, they are not qualified to be? YES? or NO?

2) If your answer to #1 is YES, how did they get there?


Now I will answer my own questions:

1) Yes, many. I work with a good chunk of women in IT who have no technical skills and can't even put IT components together in a logical black box/flow chart manor if given a pen and paper. Not only do they NOT know how how stuff works in detail, but they can't even explain it in "Readers Digest" format, yet the "manage" and "are in charge" of it.

2) Rather than get removed all together when they can't cut it in the technical trenches, in IT, women like this often get promoted to MANAGE the technical staff doing the things they they do not have a clue about. The people who promote them are either other unqualified women who are in positions to do so, or white knight men who either get scammed by the woman's true background and skills, or they think in the back of their mind that it's the "gentlemanly" thing to do or perhaps that it may score them pv$$y if they do a good deed for this woman. IT is a field of logic, but once this happens, operations change to emotions from said woman in charge, and everything goes to sh|t for all parties.

Anyone else?

1) Yes, but I've met countless men in that position too. Flows in both directions.

2) Doesn't matter much if it was through 'legitimate' means or not. Men network their way up the ladder all the time too, relying on their cronies to land them positions they're unqualified for.

It almost sounds like you're bitter that you weren't created with a pair of bouncing t1ts and a vag. Why?


I'm not involved in politics of any kind for work, but I stumbled upon politics (in the workforce) almost by accident some years back. Long story short, I wrote the then director of the department I worked in a well thought out, wordy email overflowing with ornate language, similar to a paper I would have written during my undergrad years. I wrote the email out of pure frustration, but I got my director's attention almost immediately, and it produced a very different effect than what I originally intended. I sent one or two more emails similar to the first one, until he swung by the area I worked in one day, pulled me aside, and asked if I would like to move up to a supervisor role. Point is that I quickly went from a nobody to somebody worth promoting in a very short amount of time - I gained his respect more through show than I did through actual substance. There were several other people far more qualified to take on that role, but he had me as his first candidate, all thanks to my ability (inadvertently) to both get myself on his radar and magnify my value. Perception is reality. The world doesn't owe you anything simply because you have a pair of b@lls dangling between your legs or you're good looking or you went to XYZ university and graduated suma cumlaude.

See where I'm getting with this? You have to adjust and learn to play the game. I used to stubbornly clutch onto so many views several years ago that I've since revised almost entirely, all to my benefit. A relevant example - I used to deplore small talk and associate it with 'small minded people'. I used to be one of those clowns who took undergrad too seriously and wanted to jump straight into existential topics with people upon first meeting like some sort of over-analytical lunatic (try both opening and centering a conversation on Heidegger or Kant with a girl who's not a philosophy major and see how far you get, although ironically enough, if your game is sharp enough, I suspect it can be done). Since embracing small talk, I've seen the quality of my interactions with people in general go up, not to mention that my success with women has multiplied exponentially as well.

Am I suggesting that you become some sort of Machiavellian master of cunning and deception to gain for yourself that seat on the throne you think belongs to you? Maybe (see women's relation to the dark triad), but I don't think it's absolutely necessary - your call. What I am suggesting is that perhaps it's time to abandon the textbook approach, to leave behind the resentment that comes with reality not squaring up with your ideals, and realize that it's still a man's world.

 

[logicallefty]

I appreciate the further responses.

This thread has nothing to do with my own personal successes. This has to do with sitting and watching how women ruin so many things around us in which we have little or no control.

Issues at work were what prompted me to write the original post. Where I work the pecking order from the top down to me is as follows:

1) CEO\woman 2) man 3)man 4) woman 5) man 6)Lefty 7)man (I have one guy under me right now)

Even the good women I work with, which yes there are some of those too, are noticing that 80% of all problems of all types are caused by the women in the chain of command.

Woman 4 is on vacation this week. Monday we had a meeting over some very big problems and at the meeting were man 2, man 3, man 5, and Lefty.

Things went very wrong on something man 5 (my direct boss) and Lefty did, but at the meeting all went well and it ended on a positive note, and we thought all was well.

Tuesday woman 4 calls man 5 and freaks out, and gets all upset and says "we have to meet about this as soon as I get back!!!!" Man 5 says "no need its all taken care of ", and told her about the meeting we had. She said "Why was this scheduled when I was gone! I needed to be there". He said "no worries we got it handled with (other parties)".

Then she starts drilling about the mistakes we made and tearing up our abilities saying YES WE WILL meet about this when I get back. WTF??????

Why does she feel compelled to do this when the people ABOVE her aren't worried about it?

yet the two men directly above her are not upset and moving on...

 

[logicallefty]

Yet somehow we were the leaders of innovation before women's suffrage.

Given the propensity for women to vote for safety, security and larger Government, it is reasonable to conclude they take far more from the long-term sustainability of capitalism than they add to it.

^^ That's exactly my point. They ruin almost everything they are involved with. Maybe not directly and immediately in all cases. Their involvement, way of thinking, and methods are just "bad for business" in general. Rooting from their emotional brains, over time they perform an all out "DNA transplant" on the reality that would otherwise be, making said reality less productive and desirable for the men that just want to work hard, do the right thing, and enjoy their lives.

 

[Zarky]

I thought bitter rants were reserved for the "Mature" sub-forum?

 

[logicallefty]

I thought bitter rants were reserved for the "Mature" sub-forum?

No they are reserved for the guy eating your \{}/