Truly, Feminists AND Women Have Gone Mad Now.

[A-Unit]

Please note the referenced article:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,10655-2112998,00.html

Written by Feminist Author, Caitlin Moran.

First found at:

http://eternalbachelor.blogspot.com/

And I'll add this section to a nicely linked article:

http://www.askmen.com/message_boards/index.html

------------------------------

The article by Moran, and I quote:

Sex selection, then, is the unexpected cure for a misogynistic society. The only surefire way to stop men being sexist pigs is to limit severely the supply of women. Then, biology will take over with an admirable briskness and effectiveness, and do in three weeks what a decade-long government educational programme would struggle to do — make society treat women with a little bit of respect, courtesy and equality.

------------------------------

When I read mindless drivel, from a woman who "might" be 6 years older than, my first reaction is, she got d!ck in the wrong pipe, and wasn't laid properly. My gut reaction is...I sure as fvck hope women don't think like this in a growing majority, or she'll QUICKLY find out that the only thing worse than a woman scorned, is a man burned. Hell would be smart to watch wrath of man.

Obviously such tripe is meant to IRK readers, however, this, THIS, *THIS*, is all that's wrong with feminism today. And more importantly, in conjuction with the *current* system, is what's PRODUCING women of TODAY as they are.

You see, ladies, and please pull up a chair, men CAN be like Camels, as we're beings of VALUE. Sure, we might abuse our bodies, might smoke or drink to much, might even suffer many injuries, broken bones, and other such mishaps, but that physical abuse and strength is NOTHING, and we mean NOTHING, when compared to the mental fortitude it takes to IGNORE that pain.

Shall I site the case of Aaron Ralston who hacked his own arm just to LIVE? Even the villain in Saw would seek his counsel on SURVIVAL. But precisely these little mindless pieces of "so-called" journalism are created by people we see everyday teaching our girls (and boys), working in minor and major roles at corporations and in government, and also viewed as public figures. Not to mention, are writers of popular sitcom, drama, A*E, and basically any other crap be spewed forth from the feminist tree of poison. Even the slightest drop IS lethal.

Yet, ladies, to ASCEND to the place of grace you once had before biting the APPLE OF FEMINISM, and accepting the mindset of "i can have it all, while having nothing," you must realize who YOU WERE. The graceful vixens of yester-year in a world not long ago, WAS DESERVING of the hold-the-door, flowers-everyday, lovey-dovey treatment. If you become EQUAL on all levels as a man, YOU ARE A MAN, and we don't want you. MOST men when poled, WILL not lie with a slvt. Even the bible says as much. A man who can PULL women, won't get down with a woman who's pulled LOTS of men. It's not a REAL CATCH, when she has caught a HUGE net of her own men. So in what way does the double standard elude you?

The fact remains, it is seeping into the bloodstream of every young girl today, and emasculinating all young boys, as they view favoritism, and anti-heterosexual attacks, from almost the MINUTE they're cognizant of GIRLS to begin with. Consider this FELLOW men, not only do boys get attacked because MORE homosexual propaganda and education is subsidized (esp. in MA), but also because women are fed the FEMINIST propaganda at a young, IMPRESSIONABLE age. It's a doubled edged sword, to which BOYS, our sons, your sons, must learn to be like the Al Buddy of old (yet not so pathetic). They must belch, bark orders, and stand up, grab their balls and declare their life THEIR own. Or suffer in denial and lost in this sea.

All men who found this site can attest to it, and the referenced articles highlight a SERIOUSLY demented point of view regarding women. Not only do you have to be on the OFFENSE (pulling women, finding GOOD ones, educating other men, or your son's/relatives) but you must be on DEFENSE too (staying educated, getting involved, and dissolving the lies built in your mind and the mind's of other's).

------------------------------------

Crap like this merely sounds like a fat woman who was never asked to the prom, or was stood up by her prom date, or never grew boobs until late. Even if that's NOT the case, evidently SOME level of abuse occurred, to which she's devoted her biological CLOCK to resolving, and thereby inflicting pain on everyone else via her position of authority and widespread heresy. Even those who represent *certain* political parties seem to demonstrate how childhood ILLS become the motivating factors in adulthood. Young boys who were bullied, will inevitably seek stronger power centralized, more protection, and a push toward conservatism. Boys who were/are outgoing, confident, and social, seek generally liberal pursuits and goals. They don't want to be impinged on, as they do not want other's to be impinged on.

However, it's this mindset so few let go of that poisons the whole well. And hatred and bitterness are acids that eat their own bucket. Which is why I say to DROP hatred/bitterness of women, BUT beaware. Or better yet, Boycott Marriage, esp. with respect to women who demonstrate FAR too many feminist traits. And I would surmise MANY of you find this true. The world doesn't have to LIVE as I, or you, or they say so, but when I hear SOMEONE wants to lop off a few THOUSAND or HUNDRED THOUSAND young beautiful girls because she wants to be the prettiest heffer at the ball, I'm OUTRAGED. And so should other daugthers, mothers, and grandmothers.

You don't INCREASE VALUE ONLY by decreasing SUPPLY. YOU INCREASE VALUE by INCREASING THE INHERENT VALUE of said product. For instance, the world over, we're pretty dead even on mentowomen ratios. IF all women, BUILT their FEMINIE value UP, to a high level, all men would lose their head trying to GET one right this minute.

There's certainly NO shortage of IPODS the world around, yet, the stock is running like crazy. BMW's are definately not in short demand, but they still come and go fast. So fast, even USED car salesman offer BMW's as regularly as they do Chevies, Hondas, and Toyotas, once the staple in used car sales.

A product is NOT more valuable just by less women. Look at the US. Certain sections have a plethora of women, such as the southern parts, Florida, Texas, and the Midwestern cities. The northeast rings in about dead even. Yet, men aren't CLAMERING to get one, as if it's the last. Once I've busted my "nut", whether through mary palm or mary hooker, I'm spent, and will go eat, sleep, or watch football. (Fun Caveman Reference). A woman WITH NO VALUE INHERENTLY, such as slvts, *****s, douche bags, and any other conceivable name, has NO VALUE besides sex. Which, frankly men, we could take or leave. Couldn't we? It isn't worth the hassle, and MOST guys here are on MASTURBATION withdrawal streaks, so I certainly think we wouldn't go BROKEBACK mountain if suddenly there were 100% more guys than women.

So, the idea that if the female population was cut in half abuses and perverts statistics to the maximum. But that accounts for SPIRITUALITY. Marriage, or any LTR, isn't ABOUT sex, as anyone who knows that can see. And nor is it about wanting SEX with 1 person. It's about wanting MORE than that that you committ. That selfless/selfish act of committing says, I want more. There's a spirituality to it, inasmuch as there's a bent of COMPARATIVE advantage.

------------------------------------

The boys/men of the world need to wake the fvck up to what's going on. You're playing a game with some seriously twisted players. Stay the good fight.

And so it was written on Wednesday, the 12th of April 2006 AD.


A-Unit

 

[Nighthawk]

The author, Caitlin Moran, used to write for the NME and is quite nice if fat..

The article concerns the very real sexism in India where female babies are being aborted because only males are deemed to have any worth. I understand her anger, more so than I lose sleep our menfolk being brainwashed into being wimps. Even if they are, I'm not, so more hotties for me.

Though I must admit that since I started reading some of the more strident opinions here I have also become increasingly annoyed by AFC-promotion in the media. That recent Johnny Cash biopic a prime example. The man is a legendary artist and Hollywood has to reduce his remarkable life story to the usual 'man has to beg on his knees finale' bull****.

Like she wouldn't have married him, he's Johnny ****ing Cash.

 

[Wyldfire]

Radical feminists are idiots. That's really what it all boils down to...

 

[Wyldfire]

The author, Caitlin Moran, used to write for the NME and is quite nice if fat..

The article concerns the very real sexism in India where female babies are being aborted because only males are deemed to have any worth. I understand her anger, more so than I lose sleep our menfolk being brainwashed into being wimps. Even if they are, I'm not, so more hotties for me.

Though I must admit that since I started reading some of the more strident opinions here I have also become increasingly annoyed by AFC-promotion in the media. That recent Johnny Cash biopic a prime example. The man is a legendary artist and Hollywood has to reduce his remarkable life story to the usual 'man has to beg on his knees finale' bull****.

Like she wouldn't have married him, he's Johnny ****ing Cash.

Practices like aborting or killing babies of one gender is retarded...and it ends up hurting the very culture that practices such nonsense. When all those boys grow up into men they can't very well mate with themselves to keep their culture alive. Boneheads...

 

[StrangeButTrue]

The woman is an idiot. She says they should allow only as many women as requested, citing free market, saying that this would rapidly increase the value of women.

Apparently, she only payed attention in the first half of her freshman economics class- if having a woman is so damn profitable, the pendulum will swing the other way and men will be aborted, resulting in a glut of "women" on the market, and you're back where you started.

What an imbecile.

 

[ShizamDaMan]

Like I need to listen to a woman who used to ho herself so she could interview greasy garage rock bands.

I'm gonna eat some bacon, scratch myself, and then take a nap.

 

[Marlimus]

I despise radical feminism more than I despise racism; nobody wants to be labeled as a racist but its somehow okay to bash men.

 

[SAYNO]

Maybe the Reverse is what will happen!

The article by Moran, and I quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Sex selection, then, is the unexpected cure for a misogynistic society. The only surefire way to stop men being sexist pigs is to limit severely the supply of women. Then, biology will take over with an admirable briskness and effectiveness, and do in three weeks what a decade-long government educational programme would struggle to do — make society treat women with a little bit of respect, courtesy and equality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm..

It actually might happen the other way around (if men get fed up with all the feminist nonsense), maybe men will start breeding women as this article from Angry Harry points out:



"In the past, men have always had to be nice to their women in order for their societies to cater as best as they could for their needs and desires.

But, in the future, men might well not have to be so nice in order to guarantee the success of their societies - and themselves!

You see, in the past, if men did not treat their women properly (i.e. as women wished to be treated) then, at the very least, they could not get their support. And without the support of their womenfolk (whether in terms of society as a whole, or at an individual level) the men were doomed.

Further, in the past, when the family was everything, it was very important to keep the women happy.

There was no hope for any family or for a successful society without the support of women.

And this, of course, worked both ways.

Men and women depended on each other.

But, with genetic engineering, men will not have to be so nice anymore.

In the near future, for example, scientists will be able to create THREE WOMEN for every man - all looking like, well, whatever one chooses. And their behavioural dispositions could be, well, er, whatever one chooses.

Such possibilities are not that far away.

The men will be delighted, and so will be the women - because they will be brought up to see things this way.

It is all a question of which brain gets bigger - the male one or the female one - and which one is the 'more persuasive', both inside and outside cyberspace.

And, in my view, the male point of view will end up prevailing most strongly on both counts - for many reasons.

This is not an outcome that I am particularly aiming for, but I think that it is an outcome that the collective psychology of men will eventually arrive at, and impose.

In the past, such a development would not have occurred very easily because there would always have been enough other men who would have stepped in to 'side' with the women in order to get access to them. ("I will betray my gender if you sleep with me.")

And powerful men have always arranged matters so that their access to more women is guaranteed - by, basically, oppressing and depriving those men who are lower down the food chain.

But, in the future, men will not need to compete with each other over women, if more than enough women are made available through genetic manipulation.

And they will recognise this!

And therein lies the BIG change in the future balance of power.

Could women stop such a thing?

In the long run, I doubt it.

How come?

Well, in general, if men begin to see women as their adversaries rather than as their comrades, and a battle ensues, then the men will win hands down. The women will have no chance of succeeding.

NONE. AT. ALL.

The only question of real interest is, therefore, will there be such a battle?

And the answer to this is that it is probably already taking place!

The men's movement is NOT a major power player in this battle, as yet, but it will be.

For the moment, the battle is mostly taking place at the level of the individual (divorce, violence, avoidance of marriage, promiscuity, homosexuality) and it has been going on for some time.

But when enough men begin to realise that much of the world's problems arise because of the dissatisfaction of men, and they consider ways in which this might be best alleviated, the subjugation of women while increasing their number would seem to have a lot going for it - particularly given that most men on the planet would quite readily take to such an idea.


Supporting feminism will probably turn out to be the biggest mistake that western women have ever made. They have betrayed the very men who sacrificed much of their being and who worked and fought so hard in order to protect and care for them and themselves, and who have managed to provide the west with all the luxuries and benefits to which its peoples have grown so accustomed.

Compared to western men, western women have contributed very little to the stunning progress achieved in their societies and, currently, by supporting feminism they seem to be doing their damnedest to destroy what their men have achieved.

We seem to have reached a situation where a vicious cycle of hatred has been set up by women's groups whereby men are responding to their alienation in a manner which guarantees even more alienation. And this spiraling upwards of hatred toward men now seems unstoppable.

And this is why I believe that western women might have already missed the boat.

Some kind of crisis seems likely to take place throughout the western world in the very near future because more and more men will begin to act destructively toward it in various ways. And men will have far more destructive power than ever they have had in the past - compared to their rulers - because of the new technology.

But this, I suspect, would just represent the first phase in the process of men re-shaping their societies.

Western men will recognise that their women are a threat to them (and, hence, even to themselves) and so they will disempower them.

And then, having done so, more than enough men might well decide, consciously or not, to give women a taste of their own medicine, and begin to demonise them, just as they have for so long been demonised themselves.

And, in this, they might well be more than just successful.

Matters could easily reach a stage where, for example, people actually laughed when women were genuinely raped (in much the same way that cutting off a man's penis is currently considered to be funny) or where people couldn't give a damn that a man was violent toward his female partner (like it is today when the reverse is true) or where women could quickly be hauled off by the police for merely shouting at their menfolk (like it is today when the reverse is true).

And so on.

Well, western women certainly wouldn't like to live in a world like that!

Would they?

But they seem most content for their men to have to live under such unhappy circumstances.

And my guess is that, in the near future, more than enough men will remember this state of affairs, and the lack of concern that it shows for them, and they will be affected by it.

Deeply.

And long term.

Putting this another way: If western men in the future decided to heap upon women as much hatred as has been heaped by women upon them, one quite shudders at what they might do!

The appropriate male psychology is already in place (and being further alienated from women all the time by vindictive women's groups) the appropriate technology is getting there, and the appropriate biology is not that far away.

And if western women do not quickly wake up to what the government, the justice system and the media are doing to their men, then the backlash will be far worse.

Of course, the disempowerment of western women would not necessarily give rise to the 'abuse' of women. For example, children are mostly disempowered compared to their parents, but most parents do not use their greater power to abuse their children. Indeed, they do their best for their children.

And the same might happen with regard to western women in the future.

And, on balance, they might well be in an ugly mood.

And so if western women do not very quickly start supporting their men by helping them to destroy the outrageous discrimination and demonisation that they have continually to face but, instead, actually continue to collude with those very groups that promote such things, I cannot see any type of outcome that will, let's just say, allow western women to retain the high status to which they have grown so accustomed.

And when I look at the 'powerful forces' that already exist out there - throughout the whole world - together with those that seem to be on the horizon, those that could set western women back easily by a thousand years or more seem positively HUGE!

And I can see virtually nothing to stand in their way.

And even though many men might well continue to love women, this does not mean that they need to give them much in the way of power.

As such, as I have already mentioned above, Supporting feminism will probably turn out to be the biggest mistake that western women have ever made.

And the longer that they continue to do this, the worse for them is the outcome likely to be.

Putting it simply; creating a society that exhibits a deep hatred of its men, the extent of which is evidenced, for example, by the fact that its people will actually laugh at jokes about men whose penises have been cut off, was not, in my opinion, a very wise thing for feminists to do.


By Angry Harry'



SN'

 

[seanchai]

I despise radical feminism more than I despise racism; nobody wants to be labeled as a racist but its somehow okay to bash men.

Interesting comparison, considering racism is usually considered a oppressor-to-oppressed phenomenon and feminism is usually considered to be the opposite. Not that I agree with radical feminism at all.

 

[spider_007]

Just watching 60 minutes and they have a story on the "CHINA PROBLEM". they quoted a statistic of someting like 150 boys per 100 gurls.

two of the bigest points they made was:

-with the decline of girls ther COULD BE AN INCREASE IN VIOLENCE
-there is also an increase in "baby traficing".....black market for female babys.

 

[Ralston]

**** feminism, Ima man. Ill **** a feminist too...then skeet on that *****es back.

 

[Visceral]

Truly, feminists and women have gone mad now.

Just now? It seems to me that they went mad a long time ago. No, they were born mad - both "mad" as in "insane" and "mad" as in "I'm not getting everything I want for nothing RIGHT NOW!"

Seriously, though, sh!t like this has turned me into a misogynist. If women hate me then I hate them right back. Between their constant manipulation, their endless money-grubbing, status-climbing scheming, their selfish pick-and-choose attitude towards both feminism and the traditional patriarchal system, and their baseless sense of entitlement, I am convinced that women are utterly worthless. They're not even just holes to be filled with cvm then discarded along with the condom, but not worth any amount of effort.

Maybe that can be my motivation to self-improve: become everything women want in order to lure them in, then dump their greedy, manipulating asses so hard that it leaves them broken in a pile on my doorstep ... give them a taste of their own medicine

Maybe I will make it my life's goal to personally b!tch-slap every woman on Earth ... God knows that's what I feel like doing whenever I even think about this kind of self-serving, man-hating, lesbo-feminazi bullsh!t.

All women are wh0res and that's all they are.

 

[djbr]

Maybe that can be my motivation to self-improve: become everything women want in order to lure them in, then dump their greedy, manipulating asses so hard that it leaves them broken in a pile on my doorstep ... give them a taste of their own medicine

I don't know if you mentioned this as a joke or something, but let me add that this thing works TOO WELL.

It's a war they win only if men get touch-feely. Get hard on this thing and you'll break some bones. Sad, but too true.

 

[Visceral]

I don't know if you mentioned this as a joke or something, but let me add that this thing works TOO WELL.

It's a war they win only if men get touch-feely. Get hard on this thing and you'll break some bones. Sad, but too true.

So you're warning me that I really will leave a trail of shattered souls in my wake if I try this?

Why do I feel that women win no matter what we do? Masculinity and womens' appetites match so perfectly that it seems like the only difference between giving women everything they want like an AFC and indulging your masculine nature like a real man is the phrasing.

You can build muscles for yourself or you can build them for women, but in either case, the woman gets the muscular man she wants, while the pvssy you want is still not guaranteed, since she'll dump you and spread her legs for a more muscular guy in a heartbeat. The same is true for money, sexual prowess, and everything else a man is measured by in this society.

I feel like women are in greater demand than any man could ever be, such that the advantage is always theirs no matter how much I might have going for me. We could live in a world with 10 women for every man, and they'd still be calling the shots like it was 1 woman for every 10 men instead. I can self-improve and self-improve and she'll laugh and take my wallet and go off to get reamed by another guy then tell me all about it the next day and get me thrown in jail on false rape charges when I don't love her for being an evil b!tch.

Women are users of men and I will not be used. The only thing more disturbing to me than being the means to someone else's ends is the fact that I must willingly submit to this arrangement in order to get what I want ... which is never guaranteed, not even after I've given the other person what they want - especially after I've gone first, and especially with women. Relationships - like all of life - are like a game of chicken; whoever goes first, loses, because the second person can just make more demands. This kind of "serve or be deprived" exploitation - wherever and however it manifests itself - just makes me sick to my stomach.