Time for a new HB ranking system

[ezily]

OK so after being here for a couple months and seeing the types of ways people describe girls, I've noticed some inherent problems:

1.) our current system (1-10) is too subjective
2.) it doesn't really describe the purpose of us liking the girl
3.) it doesn't get to the point

So my suggestion is to use a new system.

Let's just make the girl either a 1 or 0.

HB1 = I would have sex with this girl
UG0 = I would not have sex with this girl

See this just lets everyone reading know that the guy posting would have sex with the girl. It leaves out ambiguity and gets to the point. Because let's face it... the only reason us guys rate girls is based on whether or not we'd do them.

Anyone agree?

 

[Warrior74]

amen. I use this system....

definately fukable.
fukable.
not fukable.

 

[MacAvoy]

FYI its been suggested on here probably a thousand times but will never take off. Although the current system has its downfalls, its easy, has stood the test of time and tells alot more than a binary system. Even though we may disagree on who is a 8 or a 9, in generally it gives alot better of a picture.

What may be bangable for you certainly probably isn't bangable for someone like me.

 

[Rex Man]

How about we use the scholastic grading system? C = Average; A+ = top notch; F = FAIL

That way, there would be no confusion what a 5 or a 7 is eh? And yes I completely stole this idea from 1up.com

 

[Warrior74]

FYI its been suggested on here probably a thousand times but will never take off. Although the current system has its downfalls, its easy, has stood the test of time and tells alot more than a binary system. Even though we may disagree on who is a 8 or a 9, in generally it gives alot better of a picture.

What may be bangable for you certainly probably isn't bangable for someone like me.

true. nerds will always have the need to rate a girl on 'system'.

 

[MotownMack]

FYI its been suggested on here probably a thousand times but will never take off. Although the current system has its downfalls, its easy, has stood the test of time and tells alot more than a binary system. Even though we may disagree on who is a 8 or a 9, in generally it gives alot better of a picture.

Agreed, this seems to come up every couple off weeks. It's completely silly and rather unimportant whether or not it's 100% accurate, as it never will be.

It's useful for understanding a girls frame, how she is used to being treated by men, etc. Beyond that, it's a waste time. Nothing you can say or do will make it any less subjective, and in fact, I'd argue it's strength lies in it's simplicity.

 

[stuka1939]

While your intentions are well, I would have to say I disagree with you.

Looks for the most part are OBJECTIVE, and only partially subjective.

Unless you have a fetish for fat chicks or women with oversized noses, buck teeth or other unattractive features, WE ALL WILL AGREE on what is attractive or not. My 8, might be your 6 or 7 since you don't like blondes. However, My 8 would NEVER be your 4 or 5.

Tell me, what man on this world would say that Catherine Zeta Jones, Natalie Portman or Monica Belucci were not beautiful women?

NO MAN WOULD, unless he falls into the category above.


Face it guys, if you think a chick is attractive, so do 95% of all other males.

 

[ArtVandelay]

I'd give Zeta Jones a 6 and Portman and Belucci kind 5s. None of them are ugly, but not what I'd want to do/date.

I'd give Winona Ryder, Gillian Anderson, and Catherine Bell 10s, and while most guys in here wouldn't rate any of them below a 5, you'd get a lot of 6/7s, especially for Ryder and Anderson.

True, fat women or women with really ugly faces will be most guys 0-4, but I'd give Beyonce a 0 for the fact that she's black while other guys in here would cut off a finger for a chance to f*ck her. She doesn't get any more credit to me than Oprah or Rosie O Donnell just because she isn't fat.

 

[ARrocket]

True, fat women or women with really ugly faces will be most guys 0-4, but I'd give Beyonce a 0 for the fact that she's black while other guys in here would cut off a finger for a chance to f*ck her.

Dude....wtf??

 

[HandyAndy]

amen. I use this system....

definately fukable.
fukable.
not fukable.

Yeah, I think fukable and not fukable is better than 1-10

 

[AlanB]

In my mind, I have four possible ratings:

1) Any six ways from Sunday.

e.g. "Man, that bird is a six"
"A six? Are you kidding!?!? ...more like a nine..."
"Nah, I'd fvck her any six ways from Sunday"

2) Wouldn't say no.

e.g. "She's not bad"
"Meh, I guess she is ok"
"Yeah, but you wouldn't say no"

3) Any port in a storm.

e.g. "Hmmm... I might go and speak to that bird."
"She's nothing special, in fact she's a bit ropey"
"Yeah but I've had ten pints and haven't been laid in two months,
she'll do - any port in a storm"

4) I wouldn't touch her with yours.

e.g. "Oh my god, close your eyes before you turn to stone, there's a
hippopotamus looking at us."
"Jesus H. Christ.... that is an ugly beast"
"Yeah, I haven't been laid in 3 years but I wouldn't touch that
with yours"