The law allows slayers to fuk girls in porn, calling it "freedom of expression", but if an incel wants to get a prostitute, he goes to jail. Maybe he even gets publicly shamed and humiliated by the police
Escorts and pua clash. Pua is all about getting validation from girls, their acceptance (in a sexual format). Everything about pua is to validate a beta pretending to be alpha. Getting lots of sex makes him seem like an alpha, but they don't tell you they actually are simply after acceptance and validation, but masquerade as slayers to defend their masculine self image and fragile ego. They don't want to appear as the coddling beta males they are, they want to appear masculine as possible
If men cared so much about getting laid just for the sake of getting laid, banging escorts would be way more common. Much easier, less time consuming, and assuming the puas are spending all night at various clubs buying lots of expensive drinks and clothes and whatever else, probably cheaper. So escorts only make sense. This shows that the pua is either trying to avoid the shame of escorts, or actually wants a girls validation and acceptance.
This is a very uncomfortable principle for Game-aware men to confront. That’s a tough pill to swallow for guys who invested in the tenets of Game – because it essentially invalidates Game in a practical sense. I’d argue that it doesn’t invalidate Game from a theoretical perspective, but in practice, if you can buy the means to your sexual satisfaction what’s the point of practicing Game?
The thing about guy’s calling us some hapless losers for paying for sex is that they CAN see our logic, but still choose to play by a set of rules they think is morally or socially correct. They still believe in a social contract between men and women that dictates that if they’re not directly paying a hooker for services rendered, they’re not technically paying for sex.
Needless to say, the feminine imperative will always default to demonizing prostitution. The sad fact remains though; you will always pay for sex in some form. Game, in practice, becomes irrelevant (for purposes of becoming sexual with women at least). Men who see escort at least, have if not more, sexual experience with a larger variety of women than most betas or even some self-evincing PUAs do based on numbers alone.
Prostitution and social interdependence with men has been what has historically kept that hypergamy in check. Post sexual revolution, Game has evolved as a countermeasure to hypergamy, but it’s hard to ignore the utility of a classic like prostitution.
Even for the guys who are well versed in the nuts and bolts of gender dynamics from a social and biological standpoint, it’s too terrible a thought to think that all the results of their efforts really just hinge upon how well he’s able to satisfy her base hypergamic list of prerequisites instead of some more esoteric value they both share together as a couple
Naturally, women will reinforce the opposite perception. It’s in the feminine’s interest to shame and deride any man pointing out the Achilles heel in their equation. It’s equally important to shame and deride her sisters who’d make a living from practicing the same truth they need to repress. Gold Diggers, Attention whorress, they’re both threats of overtly exposing the mechanics behind the feminine imperative – which is essentially an exchange of provisioning for sexual service – so they must be marginalized and shamed to keep the social convention operating as discreetly as possible.
Sexuality defines our relations with women. Sex is the deal breaker. Sex is the glue that holds relationships together. Sex is the deal breaker, without it a woman becomes your mother or sister.
Escorts and pua clash. Pua is all about getting validation from girls, their acceptance (in a sexual format). Everything about pua is to validate a beta pretending to be alpha. Getting lots of sex makes him seem like an alpha, but they don't tell you they actually are simply after acceptance and validation, but masquerade as slayers to defend their masculine self image and fragile ego. They don't want to appear as the coddling beta males they are, they want to appear masculine as possible
If men cared so much about getting laid just for the sake of getting laid, banging escorts would be way more common. Much easier, less time consuming, and assuming the puas are spending all night at various clubs buying lots of expensive drinks and clothes and whatever else, probably cheaper. So escorts only make sense. This shows that the pua is either trying to avoid the shame of escorts, or actually wants a girls validation and acceptance.
This is a very uncomfortable principle for Game-aware men to confront. That’s a tough pill to swallow for guys who invested in the tenets of Game – because it essentially invalidates Game in a practical sense. I’d argue that it doesn’t invalidate Game from a theoretical perspective, but in practice, if you can buy the means to your sexual satisfaction what’s the point of practicing Game?
The thing about guy’s calling us some hapless losers for paying for sex is that they CAN see our logic, but still choose to play by a set of rules they think is morally or socially correct. They still believe in a social contract between men and women that dictates that if they’re not directly paying a hooker for services rendered, they’re not technically paying for sex.
Needless to say, the feminine imperative will always default to demonizing prostitution. The sad fact remains though; you will always pay for sex in some form. Game, in practice, becomes irrelevant (for purposes of becoming sexual with women at least). Men who see escort at least, have if not more, sexual experience with a larger variety of women than most betas or even some self-evincing PUAs do based on numbers alone.
Prostitution and social interdependence with men has been what has historically kept that hypergamy in check. Post sexual revolution, Game has evolved as a countermeasure to hypergamy, but it’s hard to ignore the utility of a classic like prostitution.
Even for the guys who are well versed in the nuts and bolts of gender dynamics from a social and biological standpoint, it’s too terrible a thought to think that all the results of their efforts really just hinge upon how well he’s able to satisfy her base hypergamic list of prerequisites instead of some more esoteric value they both share together as a couple
Naturally, women will reinforce the opposite perception. It’s in the feminine’s interest to shame and deride any man pointing out the Achilles heel in their equation. It’s equally important to shame and deride her sisters who’d make a living from practicing the same truth they need to repress. Gold Diggers, Attention whorress, they’re both threats of overtly exposing the mechanics behind the feminine imperative – which is essentially an exchange of provisioning for sexual service – so they must be marginalized and shamed to keep the social convention operating as discreetly as possible.
Sexuality defines our relations with women. Sex is the deal breaker. Sex is the glue that holds relationships together. Sex is the deal breaker, without it a woman becomes your mother or sister.
