Trump said:
Bro I've been to court with a girl because it wasn't in writing.
That's freaky. I can't even begin to relate, sorry.
dasein said:
You will find that many of us "old ass guys,"
...ones who trained women to put a beeper up their panties so we could vibrate them at work,
...We don't want younger men making the same mistakes WE MADE and our friends made, often over and over...UNTIL WE LEARNED.
---
texting and phone chatting is effeminate, as in -womanly-. It's a sugar tit. It's a crutch that breaks. It's a miscommunicator. It's a time-waster. It's a pvssy drier upper. It's an unnecessary drama machine. It's mental drool. It tells a woman more swiftly and surely than any other method that you are... just like the rest, just another boy not doing things that men do, but stroking your inner vagina and cooing with her instead.
It's a video game for women.
Repped. Remember pager codes? -69, -911, -411, etc? Wanna talk about "status symbols"? That was back when digital beeping wasn't heard commonly. Now, you can't leave the house without hearing beeps, ringtones, people yelling into their phone like it's a tin can on a string... cellphones are less novel then pagers were in their day, simply because the digital technology was "new". "What's that crazy beeping noise? You hear that? What IS that? Sssh! It's buzzing! Listen! What the hell is that!?"
Boxer00 said:
Last girl I called on the phone said " Why are you calling? I only text."
Whenever I get a first text from a chick that requires a response, I call, and give the response. I've gotten the "why are you calling? I only text" test, too. My response has ALWAYS been: "I don't text. I get them just fine, but I don't send them. So, if you send a text requiring a response, expect my phone call." ...you pass the sh¡t test by staying congruent, not by apologizing and supplicating (agreeing to her texting conditions).
You'd be surprised how well that simple interaction works to reveal a woman's qualities. How? Well, when I offer that I don't text, I get two types of responses. The first being critical of me: shaming, mocking, and disrespectful. Much like the response from group-think broads on here: "Who doesn't text? That's weird."
The second type of answer is: "Ok."
The first "fighting me" answer gets a woman disqualified (or at least a strike against them) as it reveals an adversarial nature and/or a low interest. The second "Ok" answer reveals a cooperative nature and/or interest. This filtering is important to me as I don't care to find out weeks or months down the road that I hooked up with an enemy, not a partner. Moreover, there are far too many Barbie clones to be sifting through to give them more than 3 strikes. Anti-Dump really got my head right in terms of wasting time on garbage women, I can't recommend his posts highly enough. Further, Señor Fingers, in his post Weapons of Mass Seduction, has a chapter called: Empowering your Voice. He does well to illustrate the dynamics involved with a woman hearing your voice. I suggest the folks who are adamant about texting give those posts some reading. There is no sense in trying to explain the attraction dynamics when it's been done so eloquently in so many other "Five Star" threads.
___________
Last night, my frau got home from work and started complaining about her day...
Frau: "(subordinate dude) had an order that was messed up and sent 3 e-mails to the other department to try to fix it. I went over and asked him what was going on with (the order) and he told me that he was waiting for a response from (female) in (department). I sort of messed up and called him out in front of everyone basically yelling that he needs to pick up the phone and call RIGHT NOW!"
V: "As if (female) was going to be in a big hurry to reply to those nasty e-mails, eh? She was probably far too busy on Facebook to be bothered with work stuff."
Frau: "Chicks don't return messages, he should know that. You have to call sometimes, especially when something is important or time sensitive."
V: "Well, remember when I called you the first time?"
Frau: "Yeah. I remember looking at the number that I didn't recognize come up."
V: "And...?"
Frau: "I think I answered on the third ring. I'm glad I answered. I couldn't believe you called the next day!"
V: "I remember being on my way home, fully expecting your voicemail."
Frau: "Yah, I couldn't believe it was YOU. I remember the first time I texted you, too."
V: "You remember what happened?"
Frau: "You called me right back and told me you didn't text."
V: "What did you think about that?"
Frau: "Well, it's like (subordinate dude from above story) hiding behind his e-mail to take care of business, I was sort of shocked by how straight-forward you were."
V: "So, you're basically telling me that, because I didn't act scared of you on the phone, or hide behind the text screen, you saw me as different?"
Frau: "That's it, exactly. Because you didn't play phone games, it was different than all the other guys who were constantly texting How R U and stuff. I really couldn't figure you out."
^^that was just yesterday^^
I put it up here to demonstrate how frustrated a woman can be at douchebags for not using the phone
when it's time to use the phone.
Vulpines Frau said:
You have to call sometimes, especially when something is important or time sensitive.
According to this woman, phone calls are for important matters. Would it stand to reason, then, that texts are for trivial matters? Wouldn't texting a chick trivialize her?
Anyway, I called her
the day after I got her number. Believe it or not, all that "wait 3 days" and whatnot is usually counter-productive, just as texting can be. Often, instead of appearing that you are "not desperate", it comes across to women as "Player", and works against you. No, in this case, I was on the way out of town to spend a long weekend cutting wood at home and didn't care to be plagued with the thoughts of "is the hot chick I just met interested" So, I called and got it off the "to do" list sooner-than-later. Oops, she answered, and I spun the car around for a date later that evening. I called the next day, went on a date the night I called, spent that night in her bed: no texts.
She's 9 years my junior. So, while guys her age were busy trying to text her an older, non-texting guy is the one she is attracted to? What is there to be "bitter" about? She still remembers how I stood apart after 5 years: that's a lasting impression.
Remember sitting in school and handing notes across the aisle? Texting is just like that note-passing in school, except there is no paper now, and no getting caught passing the notes. Texting is like a guy slipping a note into the locker of a girl, hoping nobody sees you, instead of just talking to her. It's high school crap for those still stuck in that high school social mindset. Some people leave their school years behind and evolve into having adult social skills. Others don't evolve, and they stay stuck passing notes to girls they like, wondering why those girls are interested in the college guys, or *gasp* even
older men!
A woman insisting on texting is shady, anyhow. "I only text" says to me: "I don't want my BF/Husband/orbiters to hear me on the phone with you." It just screams cºck carousel branch-swinger. I'm not going to chase that, or pander to it via text, supplicate because she "only texts", or give much of a damn at all because "I only text" is surely wºmanese for "I only text guys I don't want to ƒuck". Call them and have a clear answer of interest sooner than later; don't get stuck feeding them attention from the friend zone like so many orbiting tweeters thinking they can "connect".
___________________
Harry came here to drop some free science for guys because, despite the obligations of his website, he stays in tune with the manosphere, just like RT and others who volunteer the gold nuggets to you for free. Yes, a little plug at the bottom is "against website rules". But, I would say he knows far more than most considering he's versed enough to have his own site, right? Just because information is contrary to what you THINK, doesn't mean it's invalid.
Guys come to SS to undo misconceptions about women. This texting business is simply another misconception. Unless you have tried your own experiments with not texting versus texting, I think guys should keep an open mind. Or, at least use the topic as an excuse to read up on the underlying dynamics. Judging by the "for texting" and "against texting" posts in this thread, can you see how fewer "non-texters" there are? It illustrates the "stand apart" dynamic. There's a reason Harry came to make the "no phone games" post: to share insights based on attraction dynamics. It's the understanding of those attraction dynamics which have lead the "anti-text" guys to that conclusion.
If you must argue "for text", at least use generally accepted attraction principles to back up the points. Otherwise there is no point, because there is no support for your claims. "It's modern" and "Everyone is doing it" are not truisms, much less have anything to do with what attracts women.
If you should encounter women that "only text", think of them as addicted to drugs. Attention being their drug of choice, text messaging is the delivery system, just like a crack pipe or heroin syringe. Do you want to feed their addiction? Or, disqualify them? And it is really like this, despite sounding like an exaggeration. If women abuse the text function of their phone to such an extent that it messes up their personal relationships, guess what, it's a problem, whether "everyone has the same problem" or not.