Take a Stand for Internet Neutrality.

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Here's the link, in the event you're skeptical or haven't heard...

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060828/internet_bill

As it stands, providers would like to do to the internet what has been done to cable, cut it up, layer it, and charge more for a variety of customizable services. There's MORE to this ever-changing plan, but it's dumbfounding, yet capitalistic in its base, that companies want to go this route, while blinding the American public.

If such laws passed, using Verizon for instance, you might gain access to a certain level, based on what you pay, and businesses would have a different level. It would not only be differentiated at the SPEED level, but ACCESS, and CONTENT. It would also enable government agencies greater oversight into the information flow, tracking far better what you view and where you go. The long-term ramifications of such laws are similar to that of the Patriot Act, passed after 9-11. The Patriot Act has been also referred to as the Patriot act because it seeks to drive out all Patriots and put them under the spotlight for all to view. No longer does privacy remain. Perhaps neighbor to neighbor, but all purchases, all balances, all possessions, and now all information you ever access, purchase, or view is been cataloged. Only, this "profiling" war is being done behind your back.

Consider that, UPC labels on food in conjunction with your plastic CREDIT/DEBIT card build a massive database of what you buy and where you buy it. You didn't think the UPC labels were unique because the company tracked them? Sure, they help # the product, but the bigger picture, which marketers AND the government LOVE about it, is that it PROFILES you, so marketing can be customized, and so like a caged animal, you're tagged with a marker that knows in ADVANCE what you likely do. When you likely shop. What products you buy that indicate your level of wealth, spending, and how the economy effects your purchases over time.

A-Unit
 

SAYNO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
520
Reaction score
25
Age
57
Location
Dallas
Wow! :(
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
I clicked on your link, and went to the website. The first thing that popped out was a propaganda poster saying "Is Bush spying on you?". So I closed the window.

I don't even need to read the article to know it is most likely emotional, with little hint of logical analysis and journalistic ethics.
 

GirlCrazy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
658
Reaction score
1
Age
58
Location
Spokane, WA
In a nutshell, the big backbone providers such as Verizon are worried about being marginalized. They don't wanna just be the "pipe", because there's not much money in that.

What they're really after is making the big content providers like Google pay up the wazoo for guaranteed QOS (quality of service) to their content. It's pretty much blackmail, where they tell a company "pay us extra, or access to your site will be really slow".

Of course, they'll still want the end user to pay extra, with the same threat against their VoIP service, because they don't make much money off of POTS (plain old telephone service). So unless you want your VoIP service de-prioritized, then you'll pay the ransom too.
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
Considering the size of Google, and the lack of incentive the IPs are providing...I doubt this will go beyond step 1. Ironic how the Big Boys are protecting us.
 
Top