Note: I originally posted this in the Anything Else forum (in response to stuartSan's rant about the success forum) but then I realized I probably should have posted it here...
I think having a separate "successes" section is counter productive.
a) it vaguely suggests that the other sections are about failure
b) it takes some of the fun out of the other sections. It is good to unexpectedly come across an occasional success story now and then in the other sections. That makes the sections feel like a healthy balance of success and failure. Segregating the successes into a separate section is like taking all the chips out of a chocolate chip cookie. Neither the cookie, nor the pile of chips ends up as satisfying as they were to begin with.
It was a well intentioned idea though, and it has helped to demonstrate how good the sosuave forum arrangement was to begin with.
DeepBlue
I think having a separate "successes" section is counter productive.
a) it vaguely suggests that the other sections are about failure
b) it takes some of the fun out of the other sections. It is good to unexpectedly come across an occasional success story now and then in the other sections. That makes the sections feel like a healthy balance of success and failure. Segregating the successes into a separate section is like taking all the chips out of a chocolate chip cookie. Neither the cookie, nor the pile of chips ends up as satisfying as they were to begin with.
It was a well intentioned idea though, and it has helped to demonstrate how good the sosuave forum arrangement was to begin with.
DeepBlue