I am 19 and in college. I have hooked up with five or six girls. None of the times in which I hooked up was I employing any of the sort of tactics that can be read up in the bible or on the boards. They were pretty much accidental. However, I have read the forums for a long time and try to integrate many of the overriding themes such as confidence and humor. I do not use openers or any of those things, I try to keep any game I have natural.
I just have a few questions, on which I myself feel conflicted about. Does anyone here acknowledge a less rational form of attraction when you meet certain people? This could be true for any relationship, friendly or intimate. Should we really want to be controlled by reason and logic when confronting one of the must fundamental drives of mankind, love or companionship? It also shoots directly for the average, and I don't mean in terms of looks. It's a numbers game really. I worry that information like the sort produced and perpetuated by this board does objectify women, as well as other people in general (AMOG is domination over males). Relating to other people as if they had some sort of quantifiable property is regarded as a "bad thing" by most moral philosophers, save Nietzsche (and more that I haven't read).
If you think it does then how do you justify it ethically? Again, this is not a condemnation, merely a question I ask out of interest--I am not really sure myself.
I just have a few questions, on which I myself feel conflicted about. Does anyone here acknowledge a less rational form of attraction when you meet certain people? This could be true for any relationship, friendly or intimate. Should we really want to be controlled by reason and logic when confronting one of the must fundamental drives of mankind, love or companionship? It also shoots directly for the average, and I don't mean in terms of looks. It's a numbers game really. I worry that information like the sort produced and perpetuated by this board does objectify women, as well as other people in general (AMOG is domination over males). Relating to other people as if they had some sort of quantifiable property is regarded as a "bad thing" by most moral philosophers, save Nietzsche (and more that I haven't read).
If you think it does then how do you justify it ethically? Again, this is not a condemnation, merely a question I ask out of interest--I am not really sure myself.