Mental anguish due to cognitive dissonance

[meldiamond]

Still waiting on that single black accomplishment. In the entirety of their history. Yeah, you draw a total blank. Like everyone else.

Make another post about how good looking you are, fake.

 

[KarmaSutra]

Well someone's feeling a bit defensive, huh?

To infer I'm defensive would imply I actually gave a flying fvck about you or your opinion.

I do not. You're nothing and no one. When you've made an indelible, a CHANGEABLE, difference in another Man's life; then, and only then, would you have the requisite wherewithall to speak conversationally with me.

 

[meldiamond]

True, but they are also part white genetically, about 25%. This, in addition to the superior environment they grow up in (white societies) gives them an IQ bump, about 85 rather than 70.

Before, black slaves loved their white masters. Their masters provided food, clothing, shelter, some meaningful work, structure to their day, a religion which didn't involve cutting off chicken's heads, medicine, and the safety of plantation life.

Far preferable to the savagery of cannibalism, voodoo, witch doctors, and the endless slaughter violence and chaos of african tribal jungle warfare.

I don't think blacks ever suffered from discrimination. Everyone who ever encountered them saw them for what they are and what are now afraid to admit: soulless savages.

Every gift they've ever received in the colonial era they've destroyed or left to neglect. All of the technology, infrastructure, hospitals, schools are now in ruins.

They're now driving out the chinese even though they invited them in. The chinese treat blacks the same way whites once did. They whip them because they refuse to work, and must double, triple, quadruple overtime to make anything work in that godforsaken land.

What's telling is that blacks are afraid of other blacks and will abandon any black nation, city or community as soon as the opportunity presents itself.

Well to be fair the blacks on this site grew up in a primarily white western society and white culture. Africans have existed much longer than white people and just look how little progress they've made and the progress they have made came from white people. Africa is still a mess and a horrible place to live. If it wasn't for European colonization they would just have no technology and probably less people. To be fair not all cultures are equal. Even primarily black areas in the US are self destructive. Sure they got a late start in terms of equality and its a cycle that started because of poverty which at first was a result of discrimination, but our society has gone above and beyond to make it easier for them to catch up. But (((they))) want them to hate whites and it's working.

 

[Soflobro#3]

To infer I'm defensive would imply I actually gave a flying fvck about you or your opinion.

I do not. You're nothing and no one. When you've made an indelible, a CHANGEABLE, difference in another Man's life; then, and only then, would you have the requisite wherewithall to speak conversationally with me.

Stay mad bruh

 

[Soflobro#3]

It's a moronic question only a truly little man could come up with.

a black man invented peanut butter

 

[meldiamond]

LMAO, more name calling and zero facts. What are you afraid of, bro?

It's a moronic question only a truly little man could come up with.

 

[meldiamond]

Actually a white canadian man invented peanut butter in 1884, Marcellus Edson.

George Carver was an advocate of crop rotation among blacks who were too stupid to know any better, but that's hardly his invention.

George Washington Carver invented absolutely nothing as far as I can tell.

 

[meldiamond]

To infer I'm defensive would imply I actually gave a flying fvck about you or your opinion.

I do not. You're nothing and no one. When you've made an indelible, a CHANGEABLE, difference in another Man's life; then, and only then, would you have the requisite wherewithall to speak conversationally with me.

Dat's a huge b#tch!

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

Name a single accomplishment of note by a woman. Just one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem

First page of Emmy Noether's article "Invariante Variationsprobleme" (1918), where she proved her theorem.
Noether's (first)[1] theorem states that every differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The theorem was proven by mathematician Emmy Noether in 1915 and published in 1918,[2] although a special case was proven by E. Cosserat & F. Cosserat in 1909.[3] The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function (which may or may not be an integral over space of a Lagrangian density function), from which the system's behavior can be determined by the principle of least action.
Noether's theorem is used in theoretical physics and the calculus of variations. A generalization of the formulations on constants of motion in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics (developed in 1788 and 1833, respectively), it does not apply to systems that cannot be modeled with a Lagrangian alone (e.g. systems with a Rayleigh dissipation function). In particular, dissipative systems with continuous symmetries need not have a corresponding conservation law.

 

[meldiamond]

https://fabpedigree.com/james/mathmen.htm

Above is a list of the top 100 mathematicians of all time. How many are female? Keep in mind, half of the human population is female. Do you think half of the list is female? I will grant white and asian women aren't as dumb as blacks. But that's not saying much.

I welcome any female mathematical genius, btw. As long as she is hot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem

First page of Emmy Noether's article "Invariante Variationsprobleme" (1918), where she proved her theorem.
Noether's (first)[1] theorem states that every differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The theorem was proven by mathematician Emmy Noether in 1915 and published in 1918,[2] although a special case was proven by E. Cosserat & F. Cosserat in 1909.[3] The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function (which may or may not be an integral over space of a Lagrangian density function), from which the system's behavior can be determined by the principle of least action.
Noether's theorem is used in theoretical physics and the calculus of variations. A generalization of the formulations on constants of motion in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics (developed in 1788 and 1833, respectively), it does not apply to systems that cannot be modeled with a Lagrangian alone (e.g. systems with a Rayleigh dissipation function). In particular, dissipative systems with continuous symmetries need not have a corresponding conservation law.

 

[Alvafe]

Your grammatical prowess aside, I cannot take anything you say with any ounce of respect or importance. If anything, it's the sh!t the rest of the rabble have already chewed then spit-out.

Keep following dear boy, keep following.

that I agree with you, you sure can't harness any respect, and from the look of it from no one here.

 

[KarmaSutra]

that I agree with you, you sure can't harness any respect, and from the look of it from no one here.

You gauge your self-worth on "likes" and "you go girl!" petty bullsh!t. How pathetic an existence. Once, when I started my journey here, this was a place where men could share different perspectives, learn a new point-of-view, and grow. Now, it's dwindled to a sorority where you girls bleed from your gaping holes with the sole intention of gaining more likes than the other girls.

 

[Soflobro#3]

You gauge your self-worth on "likes" and "you go girl!" petty bullsh!t. How pathetic an existence. Once, when I started my journey here, this was a place where men could share different perspectives, learn a new point-of-view, and grow. Now, it's dwindled to a sorority where you girls bleed from your gaping holes with the sole intention of gaining more likes than the other girls.

Your girlfriends bicep is as thick as your neck. In all honesty I just think your jealous of my hat.

 

[Alvafe]

You gauge your self-worth on "likes" and "you go girl!" petty bullsh!t. How pathetic an existence. Once, when I started my journey here, this was a place where men could share different perspectives, learn a new point-of-view, and grow. Now, it's dwindled to a sorority where you girls bleed from your gaping holes with the sole intention of gaining more likes than the other girls.

awww, good for you buddy

 

[KarmaSutra]

Your skypiece is the only redeemable part of you. Somewhere a Chinaman is so very jealous.

Tell me, how far down will you need to dig to make above minimum wage? Does your parole officer know you're (notice the proper spelling youngin') in a men's-only room?

 

[Soflobro#3]

Your skypiece is the only redeemable part of you. Somewhere a Chinaman is so very jealous.

Tell me, how far down will you need to dig to make above minimum wage? Does your parole officer know you're (notice the proper spelling youngin') in a men's-only room?

Lol

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Women are not our equal at all. They are meant to be submissive and to complement us males. They are a step above children. I am more convinced than ever about this. It is abuse to let them run their own dating lives. They are just not built to be autonomous. Western society is INSANE for letting them be independent of a man. Their very thought process is not objective enough to make rational decisions. They are just not built like that.

They're not independent. They're pawns of the state.

Women are very influenced by the societal environment. They are not designed to be iconoclasts. In the Bible myth of Adam and Eve it was Eve that the serpent targeted. This story is the very first story of the Bible. This metaphor is all a man needs to know about women. Adam gave away his control over Eve and bad things happened.

It's the first documented case of hypergamy whereby Eve aims up pushing the fruit to "be like God." As in, Adam wasn't to her standards and her aim was to be like God. Man ****ed up then by following a woman and leading. Man is again following women. And failing.

Women are not evil creatures. They are not unintelligent or selfish. They are what we make them. Much like children, they conform to the environment. Would you say that a spoiled selfish child was evil? No. Women are children. Point blank, period.

There's a certain level of acceptance required with respect to female nature and yet, more than ever, boundaries must be set.

As in, any contact to ex equates to next her or downgrade to booty call.


99% of men are cucks and upgrade *****s to wife.

Much of the pain I have felt about women is due to cognitive dissonance of not wanting to accept this fact. The idea of women being children was competing with the idea that they were the more moral and compassionate sex. We were raised to believe that women were good, moral and fairer. Harboring these competing views led to mental anguish due to cognitive dissonance. Now that I am starting to accept that they are basically children, I hope that I will not have so much anguish when they misbehave in my personal life. I don't have mental anguish when my little cousins throw a temper tantrum. It is just a minor annoyance because I understand the nature of children. If we don't complain about how children act then we should be complaining about how women act. I hope I can find more peace with this realization.

And how's that working out for you?

I enjoy the RMG group but prefer Shawn T. Smith and Donovan Sharp who has a feminine as ****kkk gf, saw some ****, and stepped up. I like rollo and rich but both seem butt hurt. Rollo keeps his pain close to his vest. Rich got divorced, divorce raped, and pawned by a single mom. I bet heavily he didn't have a date nor pulled at 21. Again, I like the dude. But the red pill rage is there. I'll buy rollos next book but the dude is hell bent likely from his past and loves talking **** at anything alternative to his path. He was a bit of a goof and disrespectful to Elliot Hulse. Not shocking, he turned down the 21 invite.

Huge fan of rsd Tyler. Yes, he's a sociopath. Likely insane. Guess what? He might be genius. I take what works. I lose the hippie nonsense and mumbo jumbo. Meditation is clutch. He beats this to death. James Marshall is great too. I think Blanc is Goat status since MM fell off. Marshall meditation method was awesome. What guys like rollo don't get is how dense ego is with life, the pursuit of women, **** tests, feminism, the war on men/boys, the online dating fiasco, and trauma.

A lot of men have been through some ****. I've buried family, friends. I have responded to life threatening situations. I grew up around projects, poor, gangs, and drive by shootings. I am not hood. But much if my friends didn't get out. Meditation is key. It's a reset.


Listen to Shawn T Smith's book. Maybe consider therapy. I cannot imagine marriage or monogamy. I am married to the game. It won't stop until the end of my day's. I'm never playing house nor allocating resources and sexual access. This is not to say, I won't ever let things ride. I will but there's no forever, no holding go. Not in the mood means #next!

Cognitive dissonance is what Stardusk describes in red pill malaise. A search for meaning outside women and children, beta provider male, etc.

You're free son. You can do whatever. Just know that you can switch off at any point. Follow the cucks and be a atm for women once her best days are over.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Entropy baby. Put of chaos comes order.

Watching it burn.


Checked out. Switched off. Pursue but for sport. Lulz @ monogamy, marriage, old baeees want to settle down.

Yeah OK bud.

 

[marvinlfloresq]

Shrill and inexpensive. This is why you're still jerking your little chicken into a crusty sock.

And you're not even supposed to be in this room where the men are.

Yo, this forum is here to help. I agree with OP, women can be childish like & make terrible decisions. (Emotional beings) perphaps he did not articulate well.

* Either way, how is you trying to bully him going to help or guide him in the right direction? I am assuming that's *you in the pict. Right?

Perphaps doing some "cardio/jumping jaxs" when someone's post bothers you would help tremendously.

 

[Soflobro#3]

Yo, this forum is here to help. I agree with OP, women can be childish like & make terrible decisions. (Emotional beings) perphaps he did not articulate well.

* Either way, how is you trying to bully him going to help or guide him in the right direction? I am assuming that's *you in the pict. Right?

Perphaps doing some "cardio/jumping jaxs" when someone's post bothers you would help tremendously.

That guy couldn't bully his own child even if he wanted